<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentax K-7 specs leaked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/04/27/pentax-k-7-specs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/04/27/pentax-k-7-specs/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 01:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: zygh</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/04/27/pentax-k-7-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>zygh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=91#comment-327</guid>
		<description>wow, looks very good. i really hope this can put pentax on the map again and give them more marketshare. this looks to be an exceptional camera. 100% &amp; 1.0X is truly great. i&#039;m curious to see what sensor it will use. suppose it&#039;s a samsung. just hope the pentax guys have managed to get something great looking out of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, looks very good. i really hope this can put pentax on the map again and give them more marketshare. this looks to be an exceptional camera. 100% &amp; 1.0X is truly great. i&#8217;m curious to see what sensor it will use. suppose it&#8217;s a samsung. just hope the pentax guys have managed to get something great looking out of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Alberto</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/04/27/pentax-k-7-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Alberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=91#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Posee modo RAW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posee modo RAW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/04/27/pentax-k-7-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=91#comment-5</guid>
		<description>of course I will have a link to CR - I just did not have time to add it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course I will have a link to CR &#8211; I just did not have time to add it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/04/27/pentax-k-7-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=91#comment-4</guid>
		<description>hey Admin, I realize this is unrelated.  But if you&#039;re trying to make a general photo equip rumors page you should have a link to Canon rumors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Admin, I realize this is unrelated.  But if you&#8217;re trying to make a general photo equip rumors page you should have a link to Canon rumors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

