Comments on: SONY 80-200F1.4 G SSM Lens? http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/ Photography news, before it happens Thu, 17 May 2012 01:45:13 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mike http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1003 Mike Wed, 27 May 2009 08:03:44 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-1003 I highly doubt any SLR could focus a f1.4 telephoto lens at 200mm accurately. The depth of field would be paper thin. As well, if you have ever held a Canon 200mm F1.8 you will know how bloody huge and heavy it is. This lens is way too light. I highly doubt any SLR could focus a f1.4 telephoto lens at 200mm accurately. The depth of field would be paper thin. As well, if you have ever held a Canon 200mm F1.8 you will know how bloody huge and heavy it is. This lens is way too light.

]]> By: Marc W. http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-322 Marc W. Mon, 11 May 2009 16:30:19 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-322 This would be awesome, but probably fake. This would be awesome, but probably fake.

]]> By: JMCS http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-16 JMCS Sat, 02 May 2009 23:24:08 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-16 It would be great... but one problem.... It would cost about as much as my car!!! It would be great… but one problem….
It would cost about as much as my car!!!

]]> By: Taschmahal http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-15 Taschmahal Sat, 02 May 2009 19:41:55 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-15 Aa 80-200 1.4 would be so sick! Aa 80-200 1.4 would be so sick!

]]> By: Hugndubl http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Hugndubl Sat, 02 May 2009 07:02:50 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-13 It looks like a dummy of a real project, not like a fake. That means it could come - or die before its birth due to economical crisis... Greetz It looks like a dummy of a real project, not like a fake. That means it could come – or die before its birth due to economical crisis…

Greetz

]]> By: WoutK89 http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-11 WoutK89 Fri, 01 May 2009 23:28:44 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-11 I bet it will be around the same weight the Sigma 200-500 f2.8 does. But hey, one can dream! ;-) I bet it will be around the same weight the Sigma 200-500 f2.8 does. But hey, one can dream! ;-)

]]> By: Niloy http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Niloy Fri, 01 May 2009 17:59:23 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-10 Although it's very likely to be fake, I do see how it could be real. Knowing Sony, they could actually produce a monster like this just to convince the regular people that unbelievably incredible photos are possible on the Sony SLRs. Marketting thing. We made it 'cuz we CAN! Although it’s very likely to be fake, I do see how it could be real.

Knowing Sony, they could actually produce a monster like this just to convince the regular people that unbelievably incredible photos are possible on the Sony SLRs.

Marketting thing.

We made it ‘cuz we CAN!

]]> By: Anonymous http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Anonymous Fri, 01 May 2009 12:57:45 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-9 At only 1080g of weight, it's less than Canon and Nikon's 70-200 2.8's! At only 1080g of weight, it’s less than Canon and Nikon’s 70-200 2.8′s!

]]> By: sonyman http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-8 sonyman Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:09:39 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-8 yes, but it is a good fake :) yes, but it is a good fake :)

]]> By: Zach Stern http://photorumors.com/2009/04/30/sony-80-200f14-g-ssm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Zach Stern Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:18:06 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=113#comment-6 fake fake

]]>