<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Samyang 8 mm f/3.5 Aspherical IF MC fish eye for Nikon</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: ptys</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link> <dc:creator>ptys</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:44:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-1289</guid> <description>now they&#039;ve tested it too
http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&amp;test_ob=160</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now they&#8217;ve tested it too<br
/> <a
href="http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&#038;test_ob=160" rel="nofollow">http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&#038;test_ob=160</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oogabooga</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link> <dc:creator>oogabooga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:08:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-46</guid> <description>Judging by the photos of the lens mount, it appears that this lens also has no CPU contacts, so it&#039;s only truly useful on a D200 or higher.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the photos of the lens mount, it appears that this lens also has no CPU contacts, so it&#8217;s only truly useful on a D200 or higher.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:06:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-34</guid> <description>thanks - I will add it to the post</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks &#8211; I will add it to the post</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:10:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-31</guid> <description>There are sample shots from this lens on LensTip:
http://lenstip.com/1702-news-Samyang_8_mm_f_3.5_Asph._IF_MC_Fish-eye_-_sample_shots.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are sample shots from this lens on LensTip:<br
/> <a
href="http://lenstip.com/1702-news-Samyang_8_mm_f_3.5_Asph._IF_MC_Fish-eye_-_sample_shots.html" rel="nofollow">http://lenstip.com/1702-news-Samyang_8_mm_f_3.5_Asph._IF_MC_Fish-eye_-_sample_shots.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Edgar</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link> <dc:creator>Edgar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:32:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-30</guid> <description>8 mm is a weird focal distance for a DX fisheye. This looks like a full frame (in the original sense: it fills the frame) fisheye. Circular fisheyes do not have a hood. Theoretically, the focal distance of a full frame DX fisheye should be, depending on the fisheye projection:
7.1 mm (for a stereographic projection)
9.0 mm (equidistant projection)
10.0 mm (equisolid angle projection)
14.2 mm (orthographic projection).The Nikon DX fisheye in 10.5 mm and claims to provide an equisolid angle projection (close enough to the theoretical 10.0 mm). This one seems to have an odd projection somewhere between stereographic and equidistant. This may be a good thing, since the stereographic projection is arguably the most pleasing for photography.It would be interesting to compare pictures of the same scene taken with both the Nikkor and this one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8 mm is a weird focal distance for a DX fisheye. This looks like a full frame (in the original sense: it fills the frame) fisheye. Circular fisheyes do not have a hood. Theoretically, the focal distance of a full frame DX fisheye should be, depending on the fisheye projection:<br
/> 7.1 mm (for a stereographic projection)<br
/> 9.0 mm (equidistant projection)<br
/> 10.0 mm (equisolid angle projection)<br
/> 14.2 mm (orthographic projection).</p><p>The Nikon DX fisheye in 10.5 mm and claims to provide an equisolid angle projection (close enough to the theoretical 10.0 mm). This one seems to have an odd projection somewhere between stereographic and equidistant. This may be a good thing, since the stereographic projection is arguably the most pleasing for photography.</p><p>It would be interesting to compare pictures of the same scene taken with both the Nikkor and this one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JSV</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link> <dc:creator>JSV</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:46:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-29</guid> <description>Found these images while perusing SLRclub.comOn a D700
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=nikon_d1_forum&amp;no=1725607On a DX camera
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=nikon_d1_forum&amp;no=1728235http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=study_gallery&amp;no=624854Here it is on sale for 450,000W (about 350US)
http://www.ch20.co.kr/shop/shopdetail.html?branduid=4969If any of those links don&#039;t work, it&#039;s because it&#039;s on a private part of the site (i.e. you have to be a member to access those parts).It is a DX fisheye. Strange that they would go this way. Rumor was they were working on a 50mm f1.4, or that the 17mm would be coming...I guess they&#039;re a company that likes to surprise people on many fronts...I do hope they eventually make a 17mm lens...would be a nice angle to play with on DX format.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found these images while perusing SLRclub.com</p><p>On a D700<br
/> <a
href="http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=nikon_d1_forum&#038;no=1725607" rel="nofollow">http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=nikon_d1_forum&#038;no=1725607</a></p><p>On a DX camera<br
/> <a
href="http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=nikon_d1_forum&#038;no=1728235" rel="nofollow">http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=nikon_d1_forum&#038;no=1728235</a></p><p><a
href="http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=study_gallery&#038;no=624854" rel="nofollow">http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=study_gallery&#038;no=624854</a></p><p>Here it is on sale for 450,000W (about 350US)<br
/> <a
href="http://www.ch20.co.kr/shop/shopdetail.html?branduid=4969" rel="nofollow">http://www.ch20.co.kr/shop/shopdetail.html?branduid=4969</a></p><p>If any of those links don&#8217;t work, it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s on a private part of the site (i.e. you have to be a member to access those parts).</p><p>It is a DX fisheye. Strange that they would go this way. Rumor was they were working on a 50mm f1.4, or that the 17mm would be coming&#8230;I guess they&#8217;re a company that likes to surprise people on many fronts&#8230;</p><p>I do hope they eventually make a 17mm lens&#8230;would be a nice angle to play with on DX format.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: woble</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link> <dc:creator>woble</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:43:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-28</guid> <description>Just cut off the hood petals and it will look semi good on FX.http://blog.panedia.com/2009/01/19/shaving-the-nikon-105mm-fisheye/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just cut off the hood petals and it will look semi good on FX.</p><p><a
href="http://blog.panedia.com/2009/01/19/shaving-the-nikon-105mm-fisheye/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.panedia.com/2009/01/19/shaving-the-nikon-105mm-fisheye/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:34:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-27</guid> <description>APS-C apparently.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APS-C apparently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ola</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link> <dc:creator>Ola</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:41:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-26</guid> <description>just to make sure is it FX friendly ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just to make sure is it FX friendly ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lblaod</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/04/samyang-8-mm-f35-aspherical-if-mc-fish-eye-for-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link> <dc:creator>lblaod</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:58:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=203#comment-25</guid> <description>cool</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 379/401 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 09:00:14 -->
