<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Pentax 50-200mm f4/5.6 WR lens</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/05/19/new-pentax-50-200mm-f456-wr-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/19/new-pentax-50-200mm-f456-wr-lens/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: rwpl</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/19/new-pentax-50-200mm-f456-wr-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link> <dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:49:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=506#comment-988</guid> <description>I&#039;d loved to see 24-70 2.8 WR from Pentax :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d loved to see 24-70 2.8 WR from Pentax <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 229/247 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 00:22:59 -->
