<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Pentax lenses leaked?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about the cost of these lenses in particular but pentax has been making some seriously cheap equipment for the value. I think they&#039;re really going to unsurp canon, or try to, on their pricing of their L lenses.

Hell if they make that 400f4 black then people will buy it just for that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the cost of these lenses in particular but pentax has been making some seriously cheap equipment for the value. I think they&#8217;re really going to unsurp canon, or try to, on their pricing of their L lenses.</p>
<p>Hell if they make that 400f4 black then people will buy it just for that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>@Jeff 

probably loads of money. I&#039;m guessing 1200 euro ( probably more )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff </p>
<p>probably loads of money. I&#8217;m guessing 1200 euro ( probably more )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-992</guid>
		<description>@rwpl

Yes better Pentax than Sony.

I wonder what the charge on the 50 f/1.0 would be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rwpl</p>
<p>Yes better Pentax than Sony.</p>
<p>I wonder what the charge on the 50 f/1.0 would be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-987</guid>
		<description>I would be great to see pentax getting a bigger part of the market cake. K7 + fast primes would defenetly convince me that this system has a future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be great to see pentax getting a bigger part of the market cake. K7 + fast primes would defenetly convince me that this system has a future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-979</guid>
		<description>I just updated it - thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just updated it &#8211; thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-977</guid>
		<description>Missing photo
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/9332/snc00021.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missing photo<br />
<a href="http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/9332/snc00021.png" rel="nofollow">http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/9332/snc00021.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-976</guid>
		<description>oops - also I posted one of the pictures twice :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops &#8211; also I posted one of the pictures twice <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: errorka</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/25/new-pentax-lenses-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>errorka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=658#comment-975</guid>
		<description>Mistyped the 20/2.8 pic url. (...21.png :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mistyped the 20/2.8 pic url. (&#8230;21.png <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

