<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Fuji S6 Pro rumor sparked again</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Gethin Coles</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1054</link> <dc:creator>Gethin Coles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:18:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=691#comment-1054</guid> <description>dont want to be a negative nancy, love the site otherwise! (but for once I checked out the source of the rumour and its just wishful thinking). I mean who wouldn&#039;t want a nikon mount 14MP FF camera with 2 extra stops dynamic range for the same price as a d300!! I&#039;d buy 2).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont want to be a negative nancy, love the site otherwise! (but for once I checked out the source of the rumour and its just wishful thinking). I mean who wouldn&#8217;t want a nikon mount 14MP FF camera with 2 extra stops dynamic range for the same price as a d300!! I&#8217;d buy 2).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=691#comment-1049</guid> <description>I agree - this rumor does not have a backbone, but it has been going around for a while.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; this rumor does not have a backbone, but it has been going around for a while.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gethin Coles</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1048</link> <dc:creator>Gethin Coles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:46:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=691#comment-1048</guid> <description>I don think this has enough weight for a posting here, its really of the &quot;this bloke told me in the pub the other day&quot; variety</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don think this has enough weight for a posting here, its really of the &#8220;this bloke told me in the pub the other day&#8221; variety</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:47:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=691#comment-1046</guid> <description>yumy !! I think its cool , Fuji is one of the historic brand ,specialy for Films and they didn&#039;t choose nikon for nothing.Since the D300 is finishing soon they probably have the right now to use it for their next camera its so cool!!!I guess its goin to film too,I m wondering what willl be the specs of this new surprise??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yumy !! I think its cool , Fuji is one of the historic brand ,specialy for Films and they didn&#8217;t choose nikon for nothing.Since the D300 is finishing soon they probably have the right now to use it for their next camera its so cool!!!I guess its goin to film too,I m wondering what willl be the specs of this new surprise??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwpl</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link> <dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=691#comment-1045</guid> <description>Wasn&#039;t there a rumour some-ware saying that a guy from Fuji said that there might be a replacement but not this year (2009)?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there a rumour some-ware saying that a guy from Fuji said that there might be a replacement but not this year (2009)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: regular!</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/05/29/fuji-s6-pro-rumor-sparked-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link> <dc:creator>regular!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:55:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=691#comment-1043</guid> <description>Wow, that would be great to see a DSLR with a really high dynamic range!
But, hey, Fuji, you still owe us a replacement to the Natura S camera ! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that would be great to see a DSLR with a really high dynamic range!<br
/> But, hey, Fuji, you still owe us a replacement to the Natura S camera ! <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 321/329 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 00:13:49 -->
