<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Pentax K7 is not a replacement for the Pentax K20D</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/06/03/pentax-k7-is-not-a-replacement-for-the-pentax-k20d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/03/pentax-k7-is-not-a-replacement-for-the-pentax-k20d/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: RBellavance</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/03/pentax-k7-is-not-a-replacement-for-the-pentax-k20d/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link> <dc:creator>RBellavance</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=741#comment-1291</guid> <description>Pentax has said from the start that the K-7 was not a replacement for the K20D.However, it does not mean that a K30D replacement will ever appear.  In fact, Pentax representatives have explicitely stated that there would be no K30D.  Period.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pentax has said from the start that the K-7 was not a replacement for the K20D.</p><p>However, it does not mean that a K30D replacement will ever appear.  In fact, Pentax representatives have explicitely stated that there would be no K30D.  Period.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 230/234 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 08:54:11 -->
