<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 60D specs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: yitzy</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>yitzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>Thats actually not a bad idea
one wheel to control aperture, one for ISO and another one in the back for shutter....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats actually not a bad idea<br />
one wheel to control aperture, one for ISO and another one in the back for shutter&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canuser</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>canuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>the admin wrote &quot;MOCKUP&quot;  under the image, why are we even discussing that - the image is  for  ilustrative purposes  only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the admin wrote &#8220;MOCKUP&#8221;  under the image, why are we even discussing that &#8211; the image is  for  ilustrative purposes  only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivienne</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>Check here



a new pic of EOS 60D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check here</p>
<p>a new pic of EOS 60D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>lol good that you spoted that ;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol good that you spoted that ;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vahid</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Vahid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>this is Canon-D60 (March 2002)
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneosd60/
hahaha!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is Canon-D60 (March 2002)<br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneosd60/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneosd60/</a><br />
hahaha!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBellavance</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>RBellavance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Never mind the blur of the hotshoe, look at the twin control wheel :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind the blur of the hotshoe, look at the twin control wheel <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djonah</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Djonah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>The question is not if the 60D will come, but when. And I seriously doubt that this is a real image of the new 60D (look at the blur on the hotshoe...common...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is not if the 60D will come, but when. And I seriously doubt that this is a real image of the new 60D (look at the blur on the hotshoe&#8230;common&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>IMVHO rumor is fakish - as removing CF slot would mean that Canon is moving his line of XXD cameras to non-pro photographers. As you just can&#039;t get the same speeds from sdhc as you do from cf.

Unless it is true for the reasons above ( so Canon is thinking that he will storm the dx market by giving a shiny gps-sd-XXD body to non-pros for a probably good price). The arguments that is : Sony is getting more and more of the market with shiny-cheep-slrs and  pentax hits with full_hd-hdr-K7. And another thing is that mayby Canon will try to out smart nikon ( with its d300 - currently best pro-dx-dslr on the market IMVVHO) by putting shiny-gps-60D for sony-like-consumers ( but below d300 in price ). 
( The question is will it try to give somehing for the pros - fast not so expenssive dslr? like d300 but with better ISO -  Probably not :/)

All above IMVVVVHO ;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMVHO rumor is fakish &#8211; as removing CF slot would mean that Canon is moving his line of XXD cameras to non-pro photographers. As you just can&#8217;t get the same speeds from sdhc as you do from cf.</p>
<p>Unless it is true for the reasons above ( so Canon is thinking that he will storm the dx market by giving a shiny gps-sd-XXD body to non-pros for a probably good price). The arguments that is : Sony is getting more and more of the market with shiny-cheep-slrs and  pentax hits with full_hd-hdr-K7. And another thing is that mayby Canon will try to out smart nikon ( with its d300 &#8211; currently best pro-dx-dslr on the market IMVVHO) by putting shiny-gps-60D for sony-like-consumers ( but below d300 in price ).<br />
( The question is will it try to give somehing for the pros &#8211; fast not so expenssive dslr? like d300 but with better ISO &#8211;  Probably not :/)</p>
<p>All above IMVVVVHO ;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ho Wai Man</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/canon-60d-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ho Wai Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=769#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>Woah!
That is a big specification from the current models.
Geo-tagging and no dam pop-up flash, should be interesting indeed.
Good info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah!<br />
That is a big specification from the current models.<br />
Geo-tagging and no dam pop-up flash, should be interesting indeed.<br />
Good info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

