Comments on: Samsung NX camera concept (Micro Four Thirds competition) http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/ Photography news, before it happens Mon, 21 May 2012 12:21:46 +0000 hourly 1 By: JSV http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1353 JSV Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:07:43 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1353 It comes in a variety of colors. http://news.danawa.com/News_List_View.php?nModeC=2&sMode=news&nSeq=1428908&auth=1 There's a neat overlay of the NX vs. a Pentax dslr to show the size differences. http://blog.daum.net/siaeyes/16157048?srchid=IIMRAiww10 And they're supposed to take video...is that touch screen technology on the last image? http://khaiyang.tistory.com/527?srchid=IIMOHJRx10 If they keep the Pentax mount, then these camera will be a joy to use, as they're rumored to be using a CMOS sensor. It comes in a variety of colors.

http://news.danawa.com/News_List_View.php?nModeC=2&sMode=news&nSeq=1428908&auth=1

There’s a neat overlay of the NX vs. a Pentax dslr to show the size differences.
http://blog.daum.net/siaeyes/16157048?srchid=IIMRAiww10

And they’re supposed to take video…is that touch screen technology on the last image?
http://khaiyang.tistory.com/527?srchid=IIMOHJRx10

If they keep the Pentax mount, then these camera will be a joy to use, as they’re rumored to be using a CMOS sensor.

]]> By: William http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1351 William Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:43:04 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1351 Ignore those whiners! This is RUMORS website, anything is a speculation. if they don't like it they can fuck off! Ignore those whiners! This is RUMORS website, anything is a speculation. if they don’t like it they can fuck off!

]]> By: PR admin http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1348 PR admin Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:09:40 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1348 exe: there is a big difference between your post and the one from bye-bye. When I give my opinion, I get feedback that I should only report rumors and let the reader decide. When I don't give my opinion (like in this case), I am being accused of starting rumors - do you understand my point? I am thinking of removing the comments all together on all 3 blogs - this is getting out of control. exe: there is a big difference between your post and the one from bye-bye. When I give my opinion, I get feedback that I should only report rumors and let the reader decide. When I don’t give my opinion (like in this case), I am being accused of starting rumors – do you understand my point? I am thinking of removing the comments all together on all 3 blogs – this is getting out of control.

]]> By: exe http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1346 exe Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:08:53 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1346 Hate to sound like an ass, but to an extend I do agree with "bye bye". "Here is a concept for Samsung NX [b]most likely generated by user[/b] which is similar to Micro Four Thirds but using a larger APS-C sensor:" That would make more accurate description of the source, which is what this site is for right? Keep up the great work with Nikon/Photo rumors, I enjoy reading them on daily basis. I have a positive view on this, but creating a whole new system is another story. Hope they can adapt one of the existing system (ie m4/3 or K mount or canikon mount - very unlikely),creating a new system from ground up from a 3rd party manufacturer sounds ridiculous to me. Hate to sound like an ass, but to an extend I do agree with “bye bye”.

“Here is a concept for Samsung NX [b]most likely generated by user[/b] which is similar to Micro Four Thirds but using a larger APS-C sensor:” That would make more accurate description of the source, which is what this site is for right?

Keep up the great work with Nikon/Photo rumors, I enjoy reading them on daily basis.

I have a positive view on this, but creating a whole new system is another story. Hope they can adapt one of the existing system (ie m4/3 or K mount or canikon mount – very unlikely),creating a new system from ground up from a 3rd party manufacturer sounds ridiculous to me.

]]> By: PR admin http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1344 PR admin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:34:19 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1344 Thanks - when I screw up, I admit it. I don't know why every negative commenter always starts referring to my traffic - I guess the problem is not really with my content, but with my traffic... Thanks – when I screw up, I admit it. I don’t know why every negative commenter always starts referring to my traffic – I guess the problem is not really with my content, but with my traffic…

]]> By: PR admin http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1343 PR admin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:30:38 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1343 you are correct you are correct

]]> By: Xian http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1342 Xian Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:18:05 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1342 The "dot" red is not Leica logo it is a AF heping light... The “dot” red is not Leica logo it is a AF heping light…

]]> By: m4/3 http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1341 m4/3 Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:55:12 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1341 Don't worry abot it PR admin, I enjoy have something new to read on a regular basis. Keep up the good coverage! Don’t worry abot it PR admin, I enjoy have something new to read on a regular basis. Keep up the good coverage!

]]> By: PR admin http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1340 PR admin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:23:15 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1340 Do you understand the concept of the word "concept"? Yes, I described it correctly as a concept for Samsung NX, I did not say BY Samsung... Bye bye! I am really tired of people complaining for no reason. Do you understand the concept of the word “concept”? Yes, I described it correctly as a concept for Samsung NX, I did not say BY Samsung…
Bye bye! I am really tired of people complaining for no reason.

]]> By: bye bye http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1337 bye bye Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:04:19 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1337 What kind of post is this supposed to be now? When k-rumors.com posted this they clearly labelled it "probably [...] only a user generated NX camera concept". 43rumors.com copied it, along with the warning: "Beware this is probably a fake concept render of the first Samsung NX camera". And now you describe it, half a day later, as "a concept for Samsung NX"? Yeah, sure it's a concept, only it is not BY Samsung, right? I don't think at all your wording is accidentally fuzzy. Once more you do your best to START rumors, not REPORT on them, in a pathetic attempt to create traffic and links to your site. I'm sorry, but I'm going to stop reading your sites now. Just carry on like this, pretty soon you'll have 100% approval ratings - because all people who like to be taken seriously will be gone. What kind of post is this supposed to be now? When k-rumors.com posted this they clearly labelled it “probably [...] only a user generated NX camera concept”. 43rumors.com copied it, along with the warning: “Beware this is probably a fake concept render of the first Samsung NX camera”. And now you describe it, half a day later, as “a concept for Samsung NX”? Yeah, sure it’s a concept, only it is not BY Samsung, right?

I don’t think at all your wording is accidentally fuzzy. Once more you do your best to START rumors, not REPORT on them, in a pathetic attempt to create traffic and links to your site.

I’m sorry, but I’m going to stop reading your sites now. Just carry on like this, pretty soon you’ll have 100% approval ratings – because all people who like to be taken seriously will be gone.

]]> By: JustMe http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1336 JustMe Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:54:44 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1336 How the heck did you a pic of the super secret new Leica? Note the red badge on the front. How the heck did you a pic of the super secret new Leica?
Note the red badge on the front.

]]> By: BP1 http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1335 BP1 Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:40:37 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1335 Isn't the Panasonic G1 the first m4/3 camera? Isn’t the Panasonic G1 the first m4/3 camera?

]]> By: PR admin http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1334 PR admin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:23:28 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1334 I updated the post - I was referring that the m4/3 will have a competition I updated the post – I was referring that the m4/3 will have a competition

]]> By: RobJ http://photorumors.com/2009/06/08/samsung-nx-camera-concept-micro-four-thirds/comment-page-1/#comment-1333 RobJ Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:51:34 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=775#comment-1333 The Samsung NX system is NOT based on Micro 4/3rds. It's a completely different system that will use an APS-C sized sensor. The Samsung NX system is NOT based on Micro 4/3rds. It’s a completely different system that will use an APS-C sized sensor.

]]>