<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Just another (small) Olympus E-P1 picture</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/06/11/just-another-small-olympus-e-p1-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/11/just-another-small-olympus-e-p1-picture/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Carlos Echenique</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/11/just-another-small-olympus-e-p1-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link> <dc:creator>Carlos Echenique</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:53:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=831#comment-1389</guid> <description>Shouldn&#039;t that be 12.30 megapixels? 1,230 Mpx = 1.2 Gigapixels which seems highly unlikely unless Wilbur Robinson brought that camera with him from the future.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t that be 12.30 megapixels? 1,230 Mpx = 1.2 Gigapixels which seems highly unlikely unless Wilbur Robinson brought that camera with him from the future.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 231/235 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 07:50:01 -->
