<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Fuji: no new DSLR in 2009</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:20:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1613</guid> <description>Fuji is part of Fujimot Industries. They could buy Nikon with their pocket change if they were really inerested in producing a camera.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuji is part of Fujimot Industries. They could buy Nikon with their pocket change if they were really inerested in producing a camera.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EdShan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link> <dc:creator>EdShan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:21:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1562</guid> <description>Ok, so the picture is fake. But a new fujifilm camera should be in development.When a new Fujifilm camera comes out, I guess it should have this type of sensor:http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08092210fujifilmEXR.aspSounds pretty promising.and about the “put a super ccd FF sensor in a d700 body but nikon canned it&quot;. I don&#039;t understand why that has to be laughable. Enlighten me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so the picture is fake. But a new fujifilm camera should be in development.</p><p>When a new Fujifilm camera comes out, I guess it should have this type of sensor:</p><p><a
href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08092210fujifilmEXR.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08092210fujifilmEXR.asp</a></p><p>Sounds pretty promising.</p><p>and about the “put a super ccd FF sensor in a d700 body but nikon canned it&#8221;. I don&#8217;t understand why that has to be laughable. Enlighten me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: regular</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link> <dc:creator>regular</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:56:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1561</guid> <description>O course I would be glad to see a new Fuji DSLR.
But Fuji should really release a new Natura S compact camera, maybe a digital version with full-frame sensor... even if I would personally prefer a film camera:)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O course I would be glad to see a new Fuji DSLR.<br
/> But Fuji should really release a new Natura S compact camera, maybe a digital version with full-frame sensor&#8230; even if I would personally prefer a film camera:)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:51:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1556</guid> <description>Thom Hogan doesn&#039;t know - he is just guessing like everybody else (including me) and the above post (and many other) confirms it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thom Hogan doesn&#8217;t know &#8211; he is just guessing like everybody else (including me) and the above post (and many other) confirms it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ed</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link> <dc:creator>ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:36:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1553</guid> <description>its an old picture of an S3 body, that picture has been around for a while-according to thom hogan, a new camera based on the d-400 was to be released at photokina last year, but the &quot;S6&quot; and the D-400 were both never released for whatever reason-there is a big thread about it in the fuji dslr forum at DPR.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its an old picture of an S3 body, that picture has been around for a while-according to thom hogan, a new camera based on the d-400 was to be released at photokina last year, but the &#8220;S6&#8243; and the D-400 were both never released for whatever reason-there is a big thread about it in the fuji dslr forum at DPR.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: THX</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1551</link> <dc:creator>THX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:48:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1551</guid> <description>Looks like a S3 body.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a S3 body.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwpl</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link> <dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:07:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1550</guid> <description>BTW .... It has NOT begun ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8230;. It has NOT begun <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwpl</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1549</link> <dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:06:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1549</guid> <description>You just kind off confirmed my words ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just kind off confirmed my words <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ivan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1547</link> <dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:29:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1547</guid> <description>Not necessarily.Nikon bodies are really sweet though, I love my D80/D300, much nicer to hold than any Canons I&#039;ve used.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily.</p><p>Nikon bodies are really sweet though, I love my D80/D300, much nicer to hold than any Canons I&#8217;ve used.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Max</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1545</link> <dc:creator>Max</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:07:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1545</guid> <description>I was at a fuji product night for my company earlier in the year and I asked the rep whether they had any plans for DSLRs and his response was that they &quot;put a super ccd FF sensor in a d700 body but nikon canned it&quot;. I tried to hold back my laughter as I thought it mean spirited to laugh in his face.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at a fuji product night for my company earlier in the year and I asked the rep whether they had any plans for DSLRs and his response was that they &#8220;put a super ccd FF sensor in a d700 body but nikon canned it&#8221;. I tried to hold back my laughter as I thought it mean spirited to laugh in his face.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1544</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1544</guid> <description>Thats a Nikon D3 body... Sorry :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a Nikon D3 body&#8230; Sorry <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwpl</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link> <dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:04:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1541</guid> <description>its not a good idea. they would end up like like sigma - cool sensor, crap body. Wont work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its not a good idea. they would end up like like sigma &#8211; cool sensor, crap body. Wont work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ivan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/06/24/fuji-no-new-dslr-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link> <dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:21:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=990#comment-1538</guid> <description>It&#039;s pretty bizarre how Fuji uses Nikon bodies.. They should design their own, with their own control interface, otherwise there&#039;s not much selling point between Nikon and Fuji besides different sensor tech.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty bizarre how Fuji uses Nikon bodies.. They should design their own, with their own control interface, otherwise there&#8217;s not much selling point between Nikon and Fuji besides different sensor tech.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 451/463 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 23:19:50 -->
