<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 60D rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ola Forsslund</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ola Forsslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>There is no sense at all in this rumor. They have no trouble moving 16MP at 6 fps, thus there is NO benefit in lower resolution. Less MP will give worse IQ in every way, including high iso performance. That alone makes this rumor busted by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no sense at all in this rumor. They have no trouble moving 16MP at 6 fps, thus there is NO benefit in lower resolution. Less MP will give worse IQ in every way, including high iso performance. That alone makes this rumor busted by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>this is what happened when sites don&#039;t quote their source - I corrected the post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is what happened when sites don&#8217;t quote their source &#8211; I corrected the post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regular</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>The Examiner&#039;s article was posted half a day later. I guess Examiner has the same source as you and me : Canonrumors ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Examiner&#8217;s article was posted half a day later. I guess Examiner has the same source as you and me : Canonrumors &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nj</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Nj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>No way.. it would never be sold with smaller total resolution than the 50D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way.. it would never be sold with smaller total resolution than the 50D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>Yeah, APS-H wouldn&#039;t make any sense, because I doubt many of the EF-S lenses have an image circle that large, and the 50D isn&#039;t aimed directly at those planning to buy full frame glass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, APS-H wouldn&#8217;t make any sense, because I doubt many of the EF-S lenses have an image circle that large, and the 50D isn&#8217;t aimed directly at those planning to buy full frame glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yitzy</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Yitzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Very not likely IMO that the 60D will be APS-H...maybe a 7D (a new line) but not the 50D&#039;s replacement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very not likely IMO that the 60D will be APS-H&#8230;maybe a 7D (a new line) but not the 50D&#8217;s replacement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

