<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Canon 60D rumor</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Ola Forsslund</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1725</link> <dc:creator>Ola Forsslund</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:41:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1725</guid> <description>There is no sense at all in this rumor. They have no trouble moving 16MP at 6 fps, thus there is NO benefit in lower resolution. Less MP will give worse IQ in every way, including high iso performance. That alone makes this rumor busted by default.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no sense at all in this rumor. They have no trouble moving 16MP at 6 fps, thus there is NO benefit in lower resolution. Less MP will give worse IQ in every way, including high iso performance. That alone makes this rumor busted by default.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:59:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1716</guid> <description>this is what happened when sites don&#039;t quote their source - I corrected the post</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is what happened when sites don&#8217;t quote their source &#8211; I corrected the post</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: regular</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link> <dc:creator>regular</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1704</guid> <description>The Examiner&#039;s article was posted half a day later. I guess Examiner has the same source as you and me : Canonrumors ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Examiner&#8217;s article was posted half a day later. I guess Examiner has the same source as you and me : Canonrumors &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nj</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link> <dc:creator>Nj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:46:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1696</guid> <description>No way.. it would never be sold with smaller total resolution than the 50D.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way.. it would never be sold with smaller total resolution than the 50D.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ivan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link> <dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1695</guid> <description>Yeah, APS-H wouldn&#039;t make any sense, because I doubt many of the EF-S lenses have an image circle that large, and the 50D isn&#039;t aimed directly at those planning to buy full frame glass.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, APS-H wouldn&#8217;t make any sense, because I doubt many of the EF-S lenses have an image circle that large, and the 50D isn&#8217;t aimed directly at those planning to buy full frame glass.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yitzy</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/07/14/canon-60d-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link> <dc:creator>Yitzy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:57:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1058#comment-1694</guid> <description>Very not likely IMO that the 60D will be APS-H...maybe a 7D (a new line) but not the 50D&#039;s replacement...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very not likely IMO that the 60D will be APS-H&#8230;maybe a 7D (a new line) but not the 50D&#8217;s replacement&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 316/323 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 20:38:30 -->
