<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Olympus EP-2: released before the end of the year, with a viewfinder</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: guido</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link> <dc:creator>guido</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:32:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1971</guid> <description>all these news are interesting and surprising but nothing would HOOTER than a return by SONY  of the contax g2 with zeiss lenses.it was the very best and would still be for sure</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all these news are interesting and surprising but nothing would HOOTER than a return by SONY  of the contax g2 with zeiss lenses.it was the very best and would still be for sure</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas R. Koll</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1926</link> <dc:creator>Thomas R. Koll</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:13:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1926</guid> <description>I&#039;d be happy if they don&#039;t put a flash into it. I love doing strobo photos and always favour a test button on the flash over built-in flash.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be happy if they don&#8217;t put a flash into it. I love doing strobo photos and always favour a test button on the flash over built-in flash.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1925</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:13:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1925</guid> <description>is the sensor big enough to where you wouldn&#039;t have to use a flash very often?Also, I agree that an on-board flash doesn&#039;t look great, but what about indoor shots of family events or like you said shots with strong back light?Isn&#039;t the whole purpose of the camera to be small and portable? I don&#039;t want to have to carry around a big flash along with it, which would obviously make it not small and portable.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the sensor big enough to where you wouldn&#8217;t have to use a flash very often?</p><p>Also, I agree that an on-board flash doesn&#8217;t look great, but what about indoor shots of family events or like you said shots with strong back light?</p><p>Isn&#8217;t the whole purpose of the camera to be small and portable? I don&#8217;t want to have to carry around a big flash along with it, which would obviously make it not small and portable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1913</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:19:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1913</guid> <description>Chances are any situation that requires a tiny direct on board flash (such as a bar) to take a photo means you are taking a photo not worth having. Buy a $100 P&amp;S for that kind of crap so you don&#039;t ruin an $800 camera when it gets beer spilled on it.The only time I ever need an on board flash is when I want to shoot a pic of a person with strong back light...and even then I still don&#039;t like using on camera flash. I&#039;d much rather put an RF transmitter in the hot shoe and hold a strobe in my left hand.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chances are any situation that requires a tiny direct on board flash (such as a bar) to take a photo means you are taking a photo not worth having. Buy a $100 P&amp;S for that kind of crap so you don&#8217;t ruin an $800 camera when it gets beer spilled on it.</p><p>The only time I ever need an on board flash is when I want to shoot a pic of a person with strong back light&#8230;and even then I still don&#8217;t like using on camera flash. I&#8217;d much rather put an RF transmitter in the hot shoe and hold a strobe in my left hand.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:24:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1909</guid> <description>you can&#039;t even use the a camera without a flash in a lot of situations. why would you want a camera you can&#039;t even use sometimes, but with a little viewfinder?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can&#8217;t even use the a camera without a flash in a lot of situations. why would you want a camera you can&#8217;t even use sometimes, but with a little viewfinder?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mads Randstoft</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1906</link> <dc:creator>Mads Randstoft</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:44:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1906</guid> <description>Signed by Nikon... They are frightened by the marketshare that this little cam have taken and try to stem the market with these rumors so people will not buy the E-P1 but sit and wait for the E-P2 so Nikon have a chance of developing a competitor to the E-P1...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signed by Nikon&#8230; They are frightened by the marketshare that this little cam have taken and try to stem the market with these rumors so people will not buy the E-P1 but sit and wait for the E-P2 so Nikon have a chance of developing a competitor to the E-P1&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: james</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link> <dc:creator>james</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:09:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1904</guid> <description>E-P2 with a built in viewfinder would tip the balance for me, I&#039;ve recently been weighing up the Lumix G1 against the E-P1 but the latter&#039;s lack of built in VF (and EXTORTIONATE cost of the external one) has been tipping me towards the Lumix. but the E-P1 is just so SHINY. EVF I would also assume, RF would make it as bulky (relatively speaking) as the G1. I rather like EVFs actually, they are much better now than a couple of years back. Still don&#039;t exactly work at the speed of light though ... if you know what I mean...+1 on the flash, can live without that</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-P2 with a built in viewfinder would tip the balance for me, I&#8217;ve recently been weighing up the Lumix G1 against the E-P1 but the latter&#8217;s lack of built in VF (and EXTORTIONATE cost of the external one) has been tipping me towards the Lumix. but the E-P1 is just so SHINY. EVF I would also assume, RF would make it as bulky (relatively speaking) as the G1. I rather like EVFs actually, they are much better now than a couple of years back. Still don&#8217;t exactly work at the speed of light though &#8230; if you know what I mean&#8230;</p><p>+1 on the flash, can live without that</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1901</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:17:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1901</guid> <description>Would much MORE rather see a viewfinder than an on camera flash any day</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would much MORE rather see a viewfinder than an on camera flash any day</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1894</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:33:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1894</guid> <description>So still no flash? Would much rather see a flash than a viewfinder.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So still no flash? Would much rather see a flash than a viewfinder.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ivan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link> <dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:57:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1891</guid> <description>Hm. An EVF, I&#039;m assuming. I would&#039;ve preferred a rangefinder.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. An EVF, I&#8217;m assuming. I would&#8217;ve preferred a rangefinder.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zygh</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link> <dc:creator>zygh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:09:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1889</guid> <description>how is that a replacement, dooby? i thinks it&#039;ll be something similar to g(h)1. hopefully, oly will have enough sense to upgrade functionality via firmware on the e-p1.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how is that a replacement, dooby? i thinks it&#8217;ll be something similar to g(h)1. hopefully, oly will have enough sense to upgrade functionality via firmware on the e-p1.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/03/olympus-ep-2-released-before-the-end-of-the-year-with-a-viewfinder/comment-page-1/#comment-1888</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:32:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1169#comment-1888</guid> <description>A replacement already. That was fast!
Maybe an &quot;up market&quot; version with higher resolution OLED screen too?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A replacement already. That was fast!<br
/> Maybe an &#8220;up market&#8221; version with higher resolution OLED screen too?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 418/444 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 09:35:02 -->
