<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic GF-1 announcement: September 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/11/panasonic-gf-1-announcement-september-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/11/panasonic-gf-1-announcement-september-1/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/11/panasonic-gf-1-announcement-september-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1256#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>why is the camera back to front?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is the camera back to front?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forester</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/11/panasonic-gf-1-announcement-september-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>Forester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1256#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying the information is wrong, but this flier is such a terrible design that there is no way it is from Panasonic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying the information is wrong, but this flier is such a terrible design that there is no way it is from Panasonic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/11/panasonic-gf-1-announcement-september-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1256#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>Do I hear a busted? :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I hear a busted? <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotomik</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/11/panasonic-gf-1-announcement-september-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>fotomik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1256#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>Heehee, is it covered in cowskin? 
&quot;Unvealing&quot; - &quot;Unveiling&quot;... getit? How embarrassing to have a typo like that.

That looks so small though! I didn&#039;t realize from the leaked pictures that it&#039;s that small. Looks almost LX-3 size to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heehee, is it covered in cowskin?<br />
&#8220;Unvealing&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Unveiling&#8221;&#8230; getit? How embarrassing to have a typo like that.</p>
<p>That looks so small though! I didn&#8217;t realize from the leaked pictures that it&#8217;s that small. Looks almost LX-3 size to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

