<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: It&#8217;s a Canon night (Canon G11)</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Mikko</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2274</link> <dc:creator>Mikko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:24:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2274</guid> <description>Dpreview just posted official info about G11 and S90. They both look pretty promising :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dpreview just posted official info about G11 and S90. They both look pretty promising <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: regular</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2273</link> <dc:creator>regular</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2273</guid> <description>update: G11 was announced with the leaked specifications.
The 77% viewfinder is *oups* not mentioned in the press release.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update: G11 was announced with the leaked specifications.<br
/> The 77% viewfinder is *oups* not mentioned in the press release.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2270</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:05:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2270</guid> <description>relax man....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>relax man&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nope</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2268</link> <dc:creator>nope</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:37:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2268</guid> <description>mini-HDMI without HD video is nonsense</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mini-HDMI without HD video is nonsense</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: frank</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2267</link> <dc:creator>frank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:34:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2267</guid> <description>Same as G10
WHY?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same as G10<br
/> WHY?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: regular</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2265</link> <dc:creator>regular</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:07:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2265</guid> <description>Maybe HD Quicktime?Anyway, I prefer my Hexar RF. It is full-frame, has a rangefinder, and is made out of titanium. Oh, it does ISO 25-6400 natively.Canon managed to squeeze a 1/1.7″ sensor and a 77% viewfinder in a plastic box? Kudos.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe HD Quicktime?</p><p>Anyway, I prefer my Hexar RF. It is full-frame, has a rangefinder, and is made out of titanium. Oh, it does ISO 25-6400 natively.</p><p>Canon managed to squeeze a 1/1.7″ sensor and a 77% viewfinder in a plastic box? Kudos.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2262</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:10:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2262</guid> <description>I think you should have. You would of won the &quot;no announcement at midnight&quot; bet. Or the &quot;no announcement at 1am&quot; bet too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should have. You would of won the &#8220;no announcement at midnight&#8221; bet. Or the &#8220;no announcement at 1am&#8221; bet too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2260</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:33:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2260</guid> <description>Im waiting right now on the canonrumors site !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im waiting right now on the canonrumors site !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2258</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:11:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2258</guid> <description>lol, no bets tonight....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, no bets tonight&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fmertz</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2257</link> <dc:creator>fmertz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:07:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2257</guid> <description>Yawn! Yet another tiny sensor camera. Who cares?!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn! Yet another tiny sensor camera. Who cares?!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:27:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2256</guid> <description>Oops, meant to post this at canonrumors. Sorry</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, meant to post this at canonrumors. Sorry</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2255</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:25:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2255</guid> <description>Are there any bets going on with the NikonRumor guys tonight?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any bets going on with the NikonRumor guys tonight?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EAJ</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2254</link> <dc:creator>EAJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:49:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2254</guid> <description>Boy, I could deal with the 10 MP but I don&#039;t want the silly swivel.  My fingers are crossed and I&#039;m hoping for FAKE!Your whited-out screen doesn&#039;t seem as askew as the one at cr, but the lower edge is crooked.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, I could deal with the 10 MP but I don&#8217;t want the silly swivel.  My fingers are crossed and I&#8217;m hoping for FAKE!</p><p>Your whited-out screen doesn&#8217;t seem as askew as the one at cr, but the lower edge is crooked.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:57:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2253</guid> <description>ALL COMPACT CAMERAS NOW A DAYS HAVE 720P AND THIS IS LIKE A PROSUMER CAMERA AND IT DOESN&#039;T HAVE HD ?? IT HAS TO BE FAKE ! OTHERWISE WE WILL SEE TONIGHT !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALL COMPACT CAMERAS NOW A DAYS HAVE 720P AND THIS IS LIKE A PROSUMER CAMERA AND IT DOESN&#8217;T HAVE HD ?? IT HAS TO BE FAKE ! OTHERWISE WE WILL SEE TONIGHT !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/18/its-a-canon-night-canon-g11/comment-page-1/#comment-2252</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:56:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1326#comment-2252</guid> <description>NO HD VIDEO !!?/ HOW SUCKY IS THAT ???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO HD VIDEO !!?/ HOW SUCKY IS THAT ???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 471/496 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 23:43:29 -->
