<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new Canons are here!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Cipix</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2308</link>
		<dc:creator>Cipix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>Yes they did...Panasonic on FZ30/FZ50...wheel that controls aperture, wheel that controls shutter speed, zoom ring, focus ring. 
Anyway, that control ring on S90 should be stepped and not stepless-fluid to have good control. I&#039;m not buying it anyway, I&#039;m just throwing my opinion.
It&#039;s good that they work on lowering the mpx, but they should also work on speed of focus and control. 
I&#039;ve played recently in a store with EVERY p&amp;s they had on display...I&#039;d have hard times choosing one that&#039;s not slow or operates like a 5 yrs old camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they did&#8230;Panasonic on FZ30/FZ50&#8230;wheel that controls aperture, wheel that controls shutter speed, zoom ring, focus ring.<br />
Anyway, that control ring on S90 should be stepped and not stepless-fluid to have good control. I&#8217;m not buying it anyway, I&#8217;m just throwing my opinion.<br />
It&#8217;s good that they work on lowering the mpx, but they should also work on speed of focus and control.<br />
I&#8217;ve played recently in a store with EVERY p&amp;s they had on display&#8230;I&#8217;d have hard times choosing one that&#8217;s not slow or operates like a 5 yrs old camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rokkor on!</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>The s90 is the most interesting camera of the lot. 

It&#039;s a little cheaper and more pocketable than the G11 with the same sensor.

The two huge pluses over the G11 -- a faster lens -- f2.0 -- and a customizable control ring that is concentric to the lens. You can set it to control ISO, exposure compensation, manual focus, white balance or zoom settings.

I think -- not sure even after reading a few &quot;hands on&quot; previews -- that it also control aperture in aperture priority mode, and shutter speed in shutter priority mode. 

I can&#039;t believe no manufacturer ever thought of the control ring idea before. On a tiny digital camera where you can only put so many buttons or wheels, it seems like such a no-brainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The s90 is the most interesting camera of the lot. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little cheaper and more pocketable than the G11 with the same sensor.</p>
<p>The two huge pluses over the G11 &#8212; a faster lens &#8212; f2.0 &#8212; and a customizable control ring that is concentric to the lens. You can set it to control ISO, exposure compensation, manual focus, white balance or zoom settings.</p>
<p>I think &#8212; not sure even after reading a few &#8220;hands on&#8221; previews &#8212; that it also control aperture in aperture priority mode, and shutter speed in shutter priority mode. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe no manufacturer ever thought of the control ring idea before. On a tiny digital camera where you can only put so many buttons or wheels, it seems like such a no-brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a Thought</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>Could it be they are making room for something new, like an EOS R model?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be they are making room for something new, like an EOS R model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>This camera is a slap in the face.  It&#039;s just catching up with the competition from last year.  WOW, brutal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera is a slap in the face.  It&#8217;s just catching up with the competition from last year.  WOW, brutal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>sure, 480p...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure, 480p&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>of course  it has look....
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0908/09081908canong11.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course  it has look&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0908/09081908canong11.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0908/09081908canong11.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2276</guid>
		<description>no video on the G11? really?!

also, the amazon pre-order price is 50$ more than MSRP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no video on the G11? really?!</p>
<p>also, the amazon pre-order price is 50$ more than MSRP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/19/the-new-canons-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1330#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>this is a first for canon, lowering the megapixels by that many...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a first for canon, lowering the megapixels by that many&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

