<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sigma SD15 DSLR camera soon to be released</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Sam</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2691</link> <dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:45:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2691</guid> <description>14 isn&#039;t a 3x lie. Its about a 1.7x lie.In other words the linear resolution of of co-sited sensor is about 1.4x that of a bayer sensor.But yes, still using the same 4.7 MPx foveon (6.6 Mpx Bayer equivalent) sensor means that Foveon sensor development has halted. SD15 is an incremental improvement, but much more would be needed at this stage to rescue the format.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14 isn&#8217;t a 3x lie. Its about a 1.7x lie.</p><p>In other words the linear resolution of of co-sited sensor is about 1.4x that of a bayer sensor.</p><p>But yes, still using the same 4.7 MPx foveon (6.6 Mpx Bayer equivalent) sensor means that Foveon sensor development has halted. SD15 is an incremental improvement, but much more would be needed at this stage to rescue the format.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: I'm fat and stupid</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2535</link> <dc:creator>I'm fat and stupid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2535</guid> <description>http://www.ddisoftware.com/sd14-5d/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.ddisoftware.com/sd14-5d/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ddisoftware.com/sd14-5d/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2502</link> <dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:01:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2502</guid> <description>the camera is relatively good on paper, but handling and real world use is terrible. and to be honest, whatever cool camera it would be, the fact you are stuck with sigma lenses is a deal killer</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the camera is relatively good on paper, but handling and real world use is terrible. and to be honest, whatever cool camera it would be, the fact you are stuck with sigma lenses is a deal killer</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Davo</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link> <dc:creator>Davo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:01:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2498</guid> <description>Agree that the SD15 is a *yawn* product but at least Sigma is willing to do things diferently. Fovean sensors for one, and the DP1/2 line. Wats a shame is their poor implementation.
No change in sensor, like when fuji went from S3 to the S5 does not bode well in this fast paced digital market.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that the SD15 is a *yawn* product but at least Sigma is willing to do things diferently. Fovean sensors for one, and the DP1/2 line. Wats a shame is their poor implementation.<br
/> No change in sensor, like when fuji went from S3 to the S5 does not bode well in this fast paced digital market.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bibbles</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2493</link> <dc:creator>bibbles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:33:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2493</guid> <description>how on earth does sigma stay afloat, with some lenses that have to be sent en masse back for focus issues, and a camera body lineup that nobody buys? i almost feel bad for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how on earth does sigma stay afloat, with some lenses that have to be sent en masse back for focus issues, and a camera body lineup that nobody buys? i almost feel bad for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rokkor on!</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2468</link> <dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:11:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2468</guid> <description>It does seem like Sigma is pouring good money after bad.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem like Sigma is pouring good money after bad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2462</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:38:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2462</guid> <description>Foveon was a wrong technology in wrong times... perhaps 10 years ago it would be cool but not now...
I wonder why are they going to make SD15 - is there any REASONABLE excuse? Do they earn anything on these cameras? Tons of R&amp;D yet barely anything sold... duh... I don&#039;t get it</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foveon was a wrong technology in wrong times&#8230; perhaps 10 years ago it would be cool but not now&#8230;<br
/> I wonder why are they going to make SD15 &#8211; is there any REASONABLE excuse? Do they earn anything on these cameras? Tons of R&amp;D yet barely anything sold&#8230; duh&#8230; I don&#8217;t get it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bubba Satori</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2461</link> <dc:creator>Bubba Satori</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2461</guid> <description>It would make a nice IR camera for $700.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would make a nice IR camera for $700.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fmertz</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2460</link> <dc:creator>fmertz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:31:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2460</guid> <description>No doubt about it. That is absolutely the final nail in Sigma&#039;s camera making coffin.
If they still haven&#039;t been able to up this miserable pixel count (14 is a 3X lie) that means only one thing; they can&#039;t figure out how to do it!
Stick a fork in them, they&#039;re done.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt about it. That is absolutely the final nail in Sigma&#8217;s camera making coffin.<br
/> If they still haven&#8217;t been able to up this miserable pixel count (14 is a 3X lie) that means only one thing; they can&#8217;t figure out how to do it!<br
/> Stick a fork in them, they&#8217;re done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrej</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/25/sigma-sd15-dslr-camera-soon-to-be-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2459</link> <dc:creator>Andrej</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:27:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1399#comment-2459</guid> <description>&quot;Anybody interested?&quot;
Nope.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anybody interested?&#8221;<br
/> Nope.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 385/391 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 08:05:25 -->
