<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sigma 70-300 OS lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before they happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkusW</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2901</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkusW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2901</guid>
		<description>Did your hear anything new on this topic so far? I&#039;m a potential customer of that lens if it has OS and HSM :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did your hear anything new on this topic so far? I&#8217;m a potential customer of that lens if it has OS and HSM <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: errorka</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2796</link>
		<dc:creator>errorka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2796</guid>
		<description>Sigma uses gold and EX for their professional lenses.

Btw: &quot;The pictured lens is the current model.&quot; (Which are absolutely not compete with L series :F)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma uses gold and EX for their professional lenses.</p>
<p>Btw: &#8220;The pictured lens is the current model.&#8221; (Which are absolutely not compete with L series :F)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rokkor on!</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification. So HSM is faster, quieter and more expensive, I guess.

I&#039;m not that familiar with Sigma-speak.

I assume in both cases, you get a lens that will autofocus on Nikon&#039;s lower-end digital SLRs, like the D40, that lack the screw-drive mechanisms of older and more expensive Nikons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification. So HSM is faster, quieter and more expensive, I guess.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not that familiar with Sigma-speak.</p>
<p>I assume in both cases, you get a lens that will autofocus on Nikon&#8217;s lower-end digital SLRs, like the D40, that lack the screw-drive mechanisms of older and more expensive Nikons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>just old styling I suppose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just old styling I suppose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sproutey</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Sproutey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>The 24/1.8 is compared to the Leica 24/1.4 in this weeks Amateur Photographer and got an excellent review. Compared very well with the Leica and at only 10% of the price !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 24/1.8 is compared to the Leica 24/1.4 in this weeks Amateur Photographer and got an excellent review. Compared very well with the Leica and at only 10% of the price !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2740</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2740</guid>
		<description>red ring? is it suppose to compete with the canon L series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>red ring? is it suppose to compete with the canon L series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>knowing that Sigma has been almost equally updating the 50/1.4 with Nikon and the 30/1.4 before Nikon came with the 35/1.8, they will do the same probably with the 20-24-28/1.8&#039;s. Please Nikon let me be wrong about this one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>knowing that Sigma has been almost equally updating the 50/1.4 with Nikon and the 30/1.4 before Nikon came with the 35/1.8, they will do the same probably with the 20-24-28/1.8&#8242;s. Please Nikon let me be wrong about this one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t there a rumor about a 70-200mm OS, a while back? Or even a report from an expo? Don&#039;t really remember.

I hope they update their 24 and 28mm primes, they seem to have lot potential, within an emerging FX market. Has anyone tried the 24mm? Wide open? Only had a chance to see the 28mm perform on a 35mm, which unfortunately didn&#039;t convince me, wide open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there a rumor about a 70-200mm OS, a while back? Or even a report from an expo? Don&#8217;t really remember.</p>
<p>I hope they update their 24 and 28mm primes, they seem to have lot potential, within an emerging FX market. Has anyone tried the 24mm? Wide open? Only had a chance to see the 28mm perform on a 35mm, which unfortunately didn&#8217;t convince me, wide open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>Now this seems to be very cool :) Looking forward for some more news!
And hoping for current 70-300 price dropdown, hehe ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this seems to be very cool <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Looking forward for some more news!<br />
And hoping for current 70-300 price dropdown, hehe <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>If not please correct me, I have no experience with other brands than Nikkor :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If not please correct me, I have no experience with other brands than Nikkor <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>Built-in is not the same as HSM, see Tamron and Tokina as far as I know. HSM is like AF-s (SWM) lenses of Nikkor. There is a difference in speed for all I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Built-in is not the same as HSM, see Tamron and Tokina as far as I know. HSM is like AF-s (SWM) lenses of Nikkor. There is a difference in speed for all I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rokkor on!</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2717</guid>
		<description>They list a new non-APO, non-OS version for Nikon with the built-in motor for $220.

The APO version wtihout HSM (buiit-in motor) or OS lists for $280.

So, it will be interesting to see what the total will be for one with APO, OS and built-in-motor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They list a new non-APO, non-OS version for Nikon with the built-in motor for $220.</p>
<p>The APO version wtihout HSM (buiit-in motor) or OS lists for $280.</p>
<p>So, it will be interesting to see what the total will be for one with APO, OS and built-in-motor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>getting bigger of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>getting bigger of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>OS and HSM I hope for them..., otherwise still nothing for D40(x)/D60/D3000/D5000 users :-P (the list is getting every day)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OS and HSM I hope for them&#8230;, otherwise still nothing for D40(x)/D60/D3000/D5000 users <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  (the list is getting every day)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
