<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Sigma 70-300 OS lens</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: MarkusW</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2901</link> <dc:creator>MarkusW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:01:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2901</guid> <description>Did your hear anything new on this topic so far? I&#039;m a potential customer of that lens if it has OS and HSM :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did your hear anything new on this topic so far? I&#8217;m a potential customer of that lens if it has OS and HSM <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: errorka</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2796</link> <dc:creator>errorka</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:04:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2796</guid> <description>Sigma uses gold and EX for their professional lenses.Btw: &quot;The pictured lens is the current model.&quot; (Which are absolutely not compete with L series :F)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma uses gold and EX for their professional lenses.</p><p>Btw: &#8220;The pictured lens is the current model.&#8221; (Which are absolutely not compete with L series :F)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rokkor on!</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2745</link> <dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:04:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2745</guid> <description>Thanks for the clarification. So HSM is faster, quieter and more expensive, I guess.I&#039;m not that familiar with Sigma-speak.I assume in both cases, you get a lens that will autofocus on Nikon&#039;s lower-end digital SLRs, like the D40, that lack the screw-drive mechanisms of older and more expensive Nikons.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification. So HSM is faster, quieter and more expensive, I guess.</p><p>I&#8217;m not that familiar with Sigma-speak.</p><p>I assume in both cases, you get a lens that will autofocus on Nikon&#8217;s lower-end digital SLRs, like the D40, that lack the screw-drive mechanisms of older and more expensive Nikons.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:55:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2744</guid> <description>just old styling I suppose</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just old styling I suppose</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sproutey</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2743</link> <dc:creator>Sproutey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:40:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2743</guid> <description>The 24/1.8 is compared to the Leica 24/1.4 in this weeks Amateur Photographer and got an excellent review. Compared very well with the Leica and at only 10% of the price !!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 24/1.8 is compared to the Leica 24/1.4 in this weeks Amateur Photographer and got an excellent review. Compared very well with the Leica and at only 10% of the price !!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2740</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:51:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2740</guid> <description>red ring? is it suppose to compete with the canon L series?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>red ring? is it suppose to compete with the canon L series?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:37:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2739</guid> <description>knowing that Sigma has been almost equally updating the 50/1.4 with Nikon and the 30/1.4 before Nikon came with the 35/1.8, they will do the same probably with the 20-24-28/1.8&#039;s. Please Nikon let me be wrong about this one</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>knowing that Sigma has been almost equally updating the 50/1.4 with Nikon and the 30/1.4 before Nikon came with the 35/1.8, they will do the same probably with the 20-24-28/1.8&#8242;s. Please Nikon let me be wrong about this one</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:36:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2737</guid> <description>Wasn&#039;t there a rumor about a 70-200mm OS, a while back? Or even a report from an expo? Don&#039;t really remember.I hope they update their 24 and 28mm primes, they seem to have lot potential, within an emerging FX market. Has anyone tried the 24mm? Wide open? Only had a chance to see the 28mm perform on a 35mm, which unfortunately didn&#039;t convince me, wide open.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there a rumor about a 70-200mm OS, a while back? Or even a report from an expo? Don&#8217;t really remember.</p><p>I hope they update their 24 and 28mm primes, they seem to have lot potential, within an emerging FX market. Has anyone tried the 24mm? Wide open? Only had a chance to see the 28mm perform on a 35mm, which unfortunately didn&#8217;t convince me, wide open.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2723</guid> <description>Now this seems to be very cool :) Looking forward for some more news!
And hoping for current 70-300 price dropdown, hehe ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this seems to be very cool <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Looking forward for some more news!<br
/> And hoping for current 70-300 price dropdown, hehe <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2722</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2722</guid> <description>If not please correct me, I have no experience with other brands than Nikkor :-D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If not please correct me, I have no experience with other brands than Nikkor <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2721</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2721</guid> <description>Built-in is not the same as HSM, see Tamron and Tokina as far as I know. HSM is like AF-s (SWM) lenses of Nikkor. There is a difference in speed for all I know.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Built-in is not the same as HSM, see Tamron and Tokina as far as I know. HSM is like AF-s (SWM) lenses of Nikkor. There is a difference in speed for all I know.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rokkor on!</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2717</link> <dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2717</guid> <description>They list a new non-APO, non-OS version for Nikon with the built-in motor for $220.The APO version wtihout HSM (buiit-in motor) or OS lists for $280.So, it will be interesting to see what the total will be for one with APO, OS and built-in-motor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They list a new non-APO, non-OS version for Nikon with the built-in motor for $220.</p><p>The APO version wtihout HSM (buiit-in motor) or OS lists for $280.</p><p>So, it will be interesting to see what the total will be for one with APO, OS and built-in-motor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2707</guid> <description>getting bigger of course</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>getting bigger of course</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/29/new-sigma-70-300-os-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2706</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1478#comment-2706</guid> <description>OS and HSM I hope for them..., otherwise still nothing for D40(x)/D60/D3000/D5000 users :-P (the list is getting every day)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OS and HSM I hope for them&#8230;, otherwise still nothing for D40(x)/D60/D3000/D5000 users <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> (the list is getting every day)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 477/491 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 23:24:06 -->
