<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2,8 XR Di II VC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: RMPossible</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>RMPossible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>This is all fine and good, but they really needed to put their VC on their 70-200 f/2.8 and the their 200-500 long zoom!  What is taking them on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all fine and good, but they really needed to put their VC on their 70-200 f/2.8 and the their 200-500 long zoom!  What is taking them on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>As it was quite sharp before, I doubt that one can expect much improvement there. In my opinion the biggest problem with this lens is the quality of the bokeh, which often seemed &quot;turbulent&quot;. I doubt that we see improvements here, as adding VC is a rather big improvement itself. But we&#039;ll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it was quite sharp before, I doubt that one can expect much improvement there. In my opinion the biggest problem with this lens is the quality of the bokeh, which often seemed &#8220;turbulent&#8221;. I doubt that we see improvements here, as adding VC is a rather big improvement itself. But we&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tabitha Green</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>Tabitha Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2813</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the optics have been improved or if they&#039;ve just added VC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the optics have been improved or if they&#8217;ve just added VC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rokkor on!</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2812</link>
		<dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2812</guid>
		<description>Press release is posted now on the U.S. site:

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Press release is posted now on the U.S. site:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rokkor on!</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>Yes. APS-C size sensors only. The &quot;DI-II&quot; indicates that the lens is designed for the smaller sensors.

From Tamron&#039;s Web site: &quot;When pictures are taken with a Di-II lens on a full-size format, image corners become dark (ie., vignetting becomes noticeable).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. APS-C size sensors only. The &#8220;DI-II&#8221; indicates that the lens is designed for the smaller sensors.</p>
<p>From Tamron&#8217;s Web site: &#8220;When pictures are taken with a Di-II lens on a full-size format, image corners become dark (ie., vignetting becomes noticeable).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2806</guid>
		<description>Finally, it has taken the genius from Tanrom to do it. Is it technically that hard for Nikon or Canon to design such a lense. I have been waiting for something llike this... i hope it will as good as there pervious model. Thank you Tamron!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, it has taken the genius from Tanrom to do it. Is it technically that hard for Nikon or Canon to design such a lense. I have been waiting for something llike this&#8230; i hope it will as good as there pervious model. Thank you Tamron!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2802</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2802</guid>
		<description>Finally, also someone who likes the tele-character of 2x-7x mm on DX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, also someone who likes the tele-character of 2x-7x mm on DX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taurui</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>taurui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2801</guid>
		<description>Interesting news, I hope they&#039;ll make a 28-75 VC too. Would be a much more interesting lens for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting news, I hope they&#8217;ll make a 28-75 VC too. Would be a much more interesting lens for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brotsalami</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>brotsalami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>So far, only a news on the German website

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, only a news on the German website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s the whole idea, we get the good stuff before everybody else...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s the whole idea, we get the good stuff before everybody else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WT</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>WT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>This is nowhere to be found outside this site. Not even the Tammy web site has this lens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nowhere to be found outside this site. Not even the Tammy web site has this lens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2792</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2792</guid>
		<description>well, I had my share... But, I thought he was replying to the first comment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, I had my share&#8230; But, I thought he was replying to the first comment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2791</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2791</guid>
		<description>What have you been smoking? A lens with ISO performance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What have you been smoking? A lens with ISO performance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>it is. And I can&#039;t wait to see its high ISO performance ;)

But I am really grateful for the camera, as it most probably will have an impact on Nikons D300(S). Finally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is. And I can&#8217;t wait to see its high ISO performance <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But I am really grateful for the camera, as it most probably will have an impact on Nikons D300(S). Finally&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmonkey</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2789</guid>
		<description>This is for crop sensors, right???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is for crop sensors, right???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2788</guid>
		<description>Canon just released the new 7D PhotoRumors !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon just released the new 7D PhotoRumors !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

