<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2,8 XR Di II VC</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: RMPossible</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link> <dc:creator>RMPossible</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:47:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2880</guid> <description>This is all fine and good, but they really needed to put their VC on their 70-200 f/2.8 and the their 200-500 long zoom!  What is taking them on this?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all fine and good, but they really needed to put their VC on their 70-200 f/2.8 and the their 200-500 long zoom!  What is taking them on this?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2820</guid> <description>As it was quite sharp before, I doubt that one can expect much improvement there. In my opinion the biggest problem with this lens is the quality of the bokeh, which often seemed &quot;turbulent&quot;. I doubt that we see improvements here, as adding VC is a rather big improvement itself. But we&#039;ll see...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it was quite sharp before, I doubt that one can expect much improvement there. In my opinion the biggest problem with this lens is the quality of the bokeh, which often seemed &#8220;turbulent&#8221;. I doubt that we see improvements here, as adding VC is a rather big improvement itself. But we&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tabitha Green</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2813</link> <dc:creator>Tabitha Green</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:24:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2813</guid> <description>I wonder if the optics have been improved or if they&#039;ve just added VC?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the optics have been improved or if they&#8217;ve just added VC?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rokkor on!</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2812</link> <dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2812</guid> <description>Press release is posted now on the U.S. site:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Press release is posted now on the U.S. site:</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rokkor on!</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2811</link> <dc:creator>Rokkor on!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2811</guid> <description>Yes. APS-C size sensors only. The &quot;DI-II&quot; indicates that the lens is designed for the smaller sensors.From Tamron&#039;s Web site: &quot;When pictures are taken with a Di-II lens on a full-size format, image corners become dark (ie., vignetting becomes noticeable).&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. APS-C size sensors only. The &#8220;DI-II&#8221; indicates that the lens is designed for the smaller sensors.</p><p>From Tamron&#8217;s Web site: &#8220;When pictures are taken with a Di-II lens on a full-size format, image corners become dark (ie., vignetting becomes noticeable).&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trevor</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2806</link> <dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:22:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2806</guid> <description>Finally, it has taken the genius from Tanrom to do it. Is it technically that hard for Nikon or Canon to design such a lense. I have been waiting for something llike this... i hope it will as good as there pervious model. Thank you Tamron!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, it has taken the genius from Tanrom to do it. Is it technically that hard for Nikon or Canon to design such a lense. I have been waiting for something llike this&#8230; i hope it will as good as there pervious model. Thank you Tamron!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2802</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:03:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2802</guid> <description>Finally, also someone who likes the tele-character of 2x-7x mm on DX!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, also someone who likes the tele-character of 2x-7x mm on DX!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: taurui</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2801</link> <dc:creator>taurui</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:19:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2801</guid> <description>Interesting news, I hope they&#039;ll make a 28-75 VC too. Would be a much more interesting lens for me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting news, I hope they&#8217;ll make a 28-75 VC too. Would be a much more interesting lens for me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: brotsalami</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link> <dc:creator>brotsalami</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:04:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2799</guid> <description>So far, only a news on the German website</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, only a news on the German website</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:55:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2798</guid> <description>that&#039;s the whole idea, we get the good stuff before everybody else...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s the whole idea, we get the good stuff before everybody else&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WT</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2797</link> <dc:creator>WT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:29:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2797</guid> <description>This is nowhere to be found outside this site. Not even the Tammy web site has this lens</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nowhere to be found outside this site. Not even the Tammy web site has this lens</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2792</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:48:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2792</guid> <description>well, I had my share... But, I thought he was replying to the first comment...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, I had my share&#8230; But, I thought he was replying to the first comment&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2791</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2791</guid> <description>What have you been smoking? A lens with ISO performance?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What have you been smoking? A lens with ISO performance?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2790</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:38:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2790</guid> <description>it is. And I can&#039;t wait to see its high ISO performance ;)But I am really grateful for the camera, as it most probably will have an impact on Nikons D300(S). Finally...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is. And I can&#8217;t wait to see its high ISO performance <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>But I am really grateful for the camera, as it most probably will have an impact on Nikons D300(S). Finally&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Webmonkey</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2789</link> <dc:creator>Webmonkey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:32:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2789</guid> <description>This is for crop sensors, right???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is for crop sensors, right???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hey</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/08/31/tamron-sp-17-50mm-f28-xr-di-ii-vc/comment-page-1/#comment-2788</link> <dc:creator>Hey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:54:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1523#comment-2788</guid> <description>Canon just released the new 7D PhotoRumors !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon just released the new 7D PhotoRumors !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 489/519 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 00:28:14 -->
