<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic announced their Micro Four Thirds lens roadmap for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/02/panasonic-announced-their-micro-four-thirds-lens-roadmap-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/02/panasonic-announced-their-micro-four-thirds-lens-roadmap-for-2010/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before they happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Innerzen</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/02/panasonic-announced-their-micro-four-thirds-lens-roadmap-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Innerzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1571#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>It is amusing to see that many people like PeterPan are so ignorant about 4/3 system and yet so eager to speak and show their ignorance or stupidity. A 4/3 7-14 f4 is in 35mm 14 -28 f4 still. If you don&#039;t understand this you will not understand any further about 4/3.

Ever wonder why the 4/3 user have the inner confidence that you don&#039;t have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amusing to see that many people like PeterPan are so ignorant about 4/3 system and yet so eager to speak and show their ignorance or stupidity. A 4/3 7-14 f4 is in 35mm 14 -28 f4 still. If you don&#8217;t understand this you will not understand any further about 4/3.</p>
<p>Ever wonder why the 4/3 user have the inner confidence that you don&#8217;t have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Pan</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/02/panasonic-announced-their-micro-four-thirds-lens-roadmap-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2944</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Pan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1571#comment-2944</guid>
		<description>Not very impressive at all...
14-28 F8
200-600 F8-11
90 F5.6 Macro
40 F3.5
16 F7
28 F5.6
28-280 F8-11
Sure, digital gives impressive hi-ISO performance, but it still feels like a step back in time to find F11 equivalent lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not very impressive at all&#8230;<br />
14-28 F8<br />
200-600 F8-11<br />
90 F5.6 Macro<br />
40 F3.5<br />
16 F7<br />
28 F5.6<br />
28-280 F8-11<br />
Sure, digital gives impressive hi-ISO performance, but it still feels like a step back in time to find F11 equivalent lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/02/panasonic-announced-their-micro-four-thirds-lens-roadmap-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1571#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>Why doesnt Nikon show us these kind of goodies :-P on the other hand, 100-300 lens with the same aperture as a 70-300 lens...., not so exciting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesnt Nikon show us these kind of goodies <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  on the other hand, 100-300 lens with the same aperture as a 70-300 lens&#8230;., not so exciting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/02/panasonic-announced-their-micro-four-thirds-lens-roadmap-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2885</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1571#comment-2885</guid>
		<description>nice lens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice lens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
