<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sigma telephoto zoom lens 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS now official</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tomas</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/comment-page-1/#comment-2943</link> <dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1584#comment-2943</guid> <description>If they had brains we would now have 70-200mm OS HSM for half the price of OEM ones. Same goes for 24-70mm. If they want to look disposable that their choice.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they had brains we would now have 70-200mm OS HSM for half the price of OEM ones. Same goes for 24-70mm. If they want to look disposable that their choice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/comment-page-1/#comment-2928</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:16:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1584#comment-2928</guid> <description>Nah... 3 times as much as the old one :/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah&#8230; 3 times as much as the old one :/</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/comment-page-1/#comment-2923</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1584#comment-2923</guid> <description>but for that price, I can get myself (another :-P) Nikkor 70-300VR Af-s!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but for that price, I can get myself (another <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> ) Nikkor 70-300VR Af-s!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bison</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/comment-page-1/#comment-2921</link> <dc:creator>bison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:52:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1584#comment-2921</guid> <description>The optical formula is different from the old 70-300, so we&#039;ll have to wait and see how the optical quality is.  My guess is that it will be better, since they&#039;re wouldn&#039;t be much point in redesigning a lens to make it worse.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The optical formula is different from the old 70-300, so we&#8217;ll have to wait and see how the optical quality is.  My guess is that it will be better, since they&#8217;re wouldn&#8217;t be much point in redesigning a lens to make it worse.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/comment-page-1/#comment-2920</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1584#comment-2920</guid> <description>And they are even behind in focus motor, so the only thing added is the letters O and S :-P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they are even behind in focus motor, so the only thing added is the letters O and S <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jaafar</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/04/sigma-telephoto-zoom-lens-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-now-official/comment-page-1/#comment-2919</link> <dc:creator>jaafar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:26:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1584#comment-2919</guid> <description>I&#039;m disappointed that this version doesn&#039;t have the 1:2 macro capability, neither the same number of SLD glasses as in the old 70-300 APO Macro version. I&#039;m guessing that the optical quality will be closer to the previous non-APO version of this lens.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disappointed that this version doesn&#8217;t have the 1:2 macro capability, neither the same number of SLD glasses as in the old 70-300 APO Macro version. I&#8217;m guessing that the optical quality will be closer to the previous non-APO version of this lens.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 320/342 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 09:21:52 -->
