<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sigma DP1s?</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: zeeGerman</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2991</link> <dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:34:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2991</guid> <description>You put Computerbild and the c&#039;t on one level? Really?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You put Computerbild and the c&#8217;t on one level? Really?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nj</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2962</link> <dc:creator>Nj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2962</guid> <description>There is a tagline below saying &quot;DP2: the successor to the DP1s&quot;. The article is actually written as if the DP1s was the model currently in the market.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a tagline below saying &#8220;DP2: the successor to the DP1s&#8221;. The article is actually written as if the DP1s was the model currently in the market.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Libby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2961</link> <dc:creator>Libby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:40:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2961</guid> <description>If they want to stay competitive, they&#039;ll have to do something.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they want to stay competitive, they&#8217;ll have to do something.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: You_ll_love_it</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2957</link> <dc:creator>You_ll_love_it</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:13:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2957</guid> <description>Thats no wild rumor. In fact this article is a commerical, launched by Sigma itself. If you look closely, you may see the word &quot;Anzeige&quot; in the upper right corner, which means: commercial.And: For me, computerbild is as reliable as every other photo- or electronic-magazine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats no wild rumor. In fact this article is a commerical, launched by Sigma itself. If you look closely, you may see the word &#8220;Anzeige&#8221; in the upper right corner, which means: commercial.</p><p>And: For me, computerbild is as reliable as every other photo- or electronic-magazine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zeeGerman</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2953</link> <dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2953</guid> <description>Computerbild isn&#039;t a reliable source. At. All.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computerbild isn&#8217;t a reliable source. At. All.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2952</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:14:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2952</guid> <description>It will essentially be a DP2 but with the wider angle lens of the DP1, I believe that will be the only difference.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will essentially be a DP2 but with the wider angle lens of the DP1, I believe that will be the only difference.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 310/330 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 20:18:30 -->
