<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma DP1s?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: zeeGerman</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2991</link>
		<dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2991</guid>
		<description>You put Computerbild and the c&#039;t on one level? Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You put Computerbild and the c&#8217;t on one level? Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nj</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2962</link>
		<dc:creator>Nj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2962</guid>
		<description>There is a tagline below saying &quot;DP2: the successor to the DP1s&quot;. The article is actually written as if the DP1s was the model currently in the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a tagline below saying &#8220;DP2: the successor to the DP1s&#8221;. The article is actually written as if the DP1s was the model currently in the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2961</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2961</guid>
		<description>If they want to stay competitive, they&#039;ll have to do something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they want to stay competitive, they&#8217;ll have to do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You_ll_love_it</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>You_ll_love_it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>Thats no wild rumor. In fact this article is a commerical, launched by Sigma itself. If you look closely, you may see the word &quot;Anzeige&quot; in the upper right corner, which means: commercial.

And: For me, computerbild is as reliable as every other photo- or electronic-magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats no wild rumor. In fact this article is a commerical, launched by Sigma itself. If you look closely, you may see the word &#8220;Anzeige&#8221; in the upper right corner, which means: commercial.</p>
<p>And: For me, computerbild is as reliable as every other photo- or electronic-magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeeGerman</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>Computerbild isn&#039;t a reliable source. At. All.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computerbild isn&#8217;t a reliable source. At. All.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/07/sigma-dp1s/comment-page-1/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1600#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>It will essentially be a DP2 but with the wider angle lens of the DP1, I believe that will be the only difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will essentially be a DP2 but with the wider angle lens of the DP1, I believe that will be the only difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

