Comments on: Sony CCD SuperHAD II sensor http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/ Photography news, before it happens Tue, 22 May 2012 15:15:39 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3119 Anonymous Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:15:16 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3119 O.k., I withdraw my assertion that it's a P&S sensor. O.k., I withdraw my assertion that it’s a P&S sensor.

]]> By: zeeGerman http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3112 zeeGerman Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:28:41 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3112 I agree. This is a picture of the D40s sensor http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40/images/d40-sensor.jpg It is at least a APS-C sized sensor, and to me it could just as well be a 35mm format sensor. I agree. This is a picture of the D40s

sensor http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40/images/d40-sensor.jpg

It is at least a APS-C sized sensor, and to me it could just as well be a 35mm format sensor.

]]> By: T3 http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3104 T3 Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:13:08 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3104 I don´t know if it is or not a 35mm sensor, but P&S is not, it is so bigger than P&S camera sensor. I don´t know if it is or not a 35mm sensor, but P&S is not, it is so bigger than P&S camera sensor.

]]> By: Anonymous http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3103 Anonymous Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:42:58 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3103 Yes, I have, thank you very much. The camera you linked to has roughly 800 by 500 pixels. Now count the number of pins, and note their size relative to the sensor. Try to compare either of those factors to a sensor that purportedly has 35 Megapixels; 87 times that number of pixels. The photo is not of a 35 MP sensor. Yes, I have, thank you very much.

The camera you linked to has roughly 800 by 500 pixels. Now count the number of pins, and note their size relative to the sensor. Try to compare either of those factors to a sensor that purportedly has 35 Megapixels; 87 times that number of pixels.

The photo is not of a 35 MP sensor.

]]> By: T3 http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3100 T3 Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:27:18 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3100 Anonymous wrote: "That picture is almost certainly not of a full-frame sensor, nor even a 1.5-ish crop sensor. The pins vs. the purported size are totally out of scale. The photo is almost certainly of a small point-and-shoot sensor." Have you seen a P&S CCD camera sensor? http://www.uocctv.com.tw/data/goods/12295994001wct20.jpg Anonymous wrote:
“That picture is almost certainly not of a full-frame sensor, nor even a 1.5-ish crop sensor. The pins vs. the purported size are totally out of scale. The photo is almost certainly of a small point-and-shoot sensor.”

Have you seen a P&S CCD camera sensor?
http://www.uocctv.com.tw/data/goods/12295994001wct20.jpg

]]> By: Anonymous http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3098 Anonymous Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:07:13 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3098 That picture is almost certainly not of a full-frame sensor, nor even a 1.5-ish crop sensor. The pins vs. the purported size are totally out of scale. The photo is almost certainly of a small point-and-shoot sensor. That picture is almost certainly not of a full-frame sensor, nor even a 1.5-ish crop sensor. The pins vs. the purported size are totally out of scale. The photo is almost certainly of a small point-and-shoot sensor.

]]> By: Anonymous http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3083 Anonymous Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:04:13 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3083 T is used to signify the actual light transmission through the aperture, not the aperture size. T in this case is most probably used because that is what is most important when it comes to sensor design - the actual transmission of light through to the individual pixel sensor, rather than the size of the aperture. T is used to signify the actual light transmission through the aperture, not the aperture size. T in this case is most probably used because that is what is most important when it comes to sensor design – the actual transmission of light through to the individual pixel sensor, rather than the size of the aperture.

]]> By: NikoDoby http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3080 NikoDoby Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:52:08 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3080 So a 34mp DSLR with HD video? So a 34mp DSLR with HD video?

]]> By: WoutK89 http://photorumors.com/2009/09/13/sony-ccd-superhad-ii-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-3079 WoutK89 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:10:47 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=1643#comment-3079 T2.7, thats used for video purposes right, kind of like the F-number for aperture on photography lenses T2.7, thats used for video purposes right, kind of like the F-number for aperture on photography lenses

]]>