<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samyang 14mm f2.8 IF ED MC Aspherical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3298</guid>
		<description>yea looks like i&#039;ll be waiting for reviews. i really hope it&#039;s everything as good as the 85mm is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea looks like i&#8217;ll be waiting for reviews. i really hope it&#8217;s everything as good as the 85mm is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeeGerman</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>Well, the Nikon equivalent of theis 85mm isn&#039;t  sharp wide open either. Actually the lens design of those two is pretty similar. As far as I heard, it&#039;s quite good wide open on DX, but fairly soft in the corner of FX. But taking in to account that it runs for about a third or a quarter, I think there&#039;s nothing to complain about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Nikon equivalent of theis 85mm isn&#8217;t  sharp wide open either. Actually the lens design of those two is pretty similar. As far as I heard, it&#8217;s quite good wide open on DX, but fairly soft in the corner of FX. But taking in to account that it runs for about a third or a quarter, I think there&#8217;s nothing to complain about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>oh, I got it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, I got it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bison</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>bison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>The product page for the 85mm here:

http://www.samyang.pl/product,21,category,5,samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if

They are shockingly honest about their own products:

&quot;At this price, even if it does lack razor-sharpness, it will seem a very attractive offer to many photography lovers.&quot;

I think that summarizes the situation perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The product page for the 85mm here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.samyang.pl/product,21,category,5,samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if" rel="nofollow">http://www.samyang.pl/product,21,category,5,samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if</a></p>
<p>They are shockingly honest about their own products:</p>
<p>&#8220;At this price, even if it does lack razor-sharpness, it will seem a very attractive offer to many photography lovers.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that summarizes the situation perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>He wasnt talking about actual translation I suppose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He wasnt talking about actual translation I suppose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>If this lens is half as good as the 85 f/1.4, i expect it to kick the Canon EF 14m f/2.8 L:s pricey little butt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this lens is half as good as the 85 f/1.4, i expect it to kick the Canon EF 14m f/2.8 L:s pricey little butt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3131</guid>
		<description>this is google translation from Polish, that&#039;s why is in quotes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is google translation from Polish, that&#8217;s why is in quotes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>&quot;highest quality imaging&quot; - ROTFL :D :D :D
Although they are cheap lenses, cheapest primes in it&#039;s ranges you&#039;ve ever seen, they are far from anything you would call &quot;highest&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;highest quality imaging&#8221; &#8211; ROTFL <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Although they are cheap lenses, cheapest primes in it&#8217;s ranges you&#8217;ve ever seen, they are far from anything you would call &#8220;highest&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3127</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3127</guid>
		<description>you miss-spelled &quot;high quality&quot;, it should be &quot;in some conditions acceptable but for price not worthy&quot;. besides, what is 85mm with bokeh worse then 80-200</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you miss-spelled &#8220;high quality&#8221;, it should be &#8220;in some conditions acceptable but for price not worthy&#8221;. besides, what is 85mm with bokeh worse then 80-200</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>It is. The 85mm also states MC in its official name, and this is its package:

http://www.samyang.pl/admin/galerie_produktow/samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if/xsize0/Samyang_85_1,4.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is. The 85mm also states MC in its official name, and this is its package:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.samyang.pl/admin/galerie_produktow/samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if/xsize0/Samyang_85_1,4.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.samyang.pl/admin/galerie_produktow/samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if/xsize0/Samyang_85_1,4.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notysarkh</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>Notysarkh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>MC isn&#039;t for Multi Coated ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC isn&#8217;t for Multi Coated ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davo</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3123</link>
		<dc:creator>Davo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3123</guid>
		<description>It says IF so it&#039;s internal focussing?? Not sure what MC stands for.
Looks promising. Hope the price is kept low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says IF so it&#8217;s internal focussing?? Not sure what MC stands for.<br />
Looks promising. Hope the price is kept low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notysarkh</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3122</link>
		<dc:creator>Notysarkh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3122</guid>
		<description>Samyang lenses are all MF isn&#039;t it ? Although that&#039;s not a problem with such a wide angle :)
The 85/1.4 of the same company was of high optical level, let&#039;s wait to have a review ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samyang lenses are all MF isn&#8217;t it ? Although that&#8217;s not a problem with such a wide angle <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The 85/1.4 of the same company was of high optical level, let&#8217;s wait to have a review <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

