<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Samyang 14mm f2.8 IF ED MC Aspherical</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3298</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:56:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3298</guid> <description>yea looks like i&#039;ll be waiting for reviews. i really hope it&#039;s everything as good as the 85mm is</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea looks like i&#8217;ll be waiting for reviews. i really hope it&#8217;s everything as good as the 85mm is</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zeeGerman</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link> <dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3142</guid> <description>Well, the Nikon equivalent of theis 85mm isn&#039;t  sharp wide open either. Actually the lens design of those two is pretty similar. As far as I heard, it&#039;s quite good wide open on DX, but fairly soft in the corner of FX. But taking in to account that it runs for about a third or a quarter, I think there&#039;s nothing to complain about.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Nikon equivalent of theis 85mm isn&#8217;t  sharp wide open either. Actually the lens design of those two is pretty similar. As far as I heard, it&#8217;s quite good wide open on DX, but fairly soft in the corner of FX. But taking in to account that it runs for about a third or a quarter, I think there&#8217;s nothing to complain about.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3138</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3138</guid> <description>oh, I got it...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, I got it&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bison</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link> <dc:creator>bison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3136</guid> <description>The product page for the 85mm here:http://www.samyang.pl/product,21,category,5,samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_ifThey are shockingly honest about their own products:&quot;At this price, even if it does lack razor-sharpness, it will seem a very attractive offer to many photography lovers.&quot;I think that summarizes the situation perfectly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The product page for the 85mm here:</p><p><a
href="http://www.samyang.pl/product,21,category,5,samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if" rel="nofollow">http://www.samyang.pl/product,21,category,5,samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if</a></p><p>They are shockingly honest about their own products:</p><p>&#8220;At this price, even if it does lack razor-sharpness, it will seem a very attractive offer to many photography lovers.&#8221;</p><p>I think that summarizes the situation perfectly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3133</guid> <description>He wasnt talking about actual translation I suppose</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He wasnt talking about actual translation I suppose</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:10:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3132</guid> <description>If this lens is half as good as the 85 f/1.4, i expect it to kick the Canon EF 14m f/2.8 L:s pricey little butt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this lens is half as good as the 85 f/1.4, i expect it to kick the Canon EF 14m f/2.8 L:s pricey little butt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3131</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:52:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3131</guid> <description>this is google translation from Polish, that&#039;s why is in quotes</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is google translation from Polish, that&#8217;s why is in quotes</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3129</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:06:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3129</guid> <description>&quot;highest quality imaging&quot; - ROTFL :D :D :D
Although they are cheap lenses, cheapest primes in it&#039;s ranges you&#039;ve ever seen, they are far from anything you would call &quot;highest&quot;....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;highest quality imaging&#8221; &#8211; ROTFL <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br
/> Although they are cheap lenses, cheapest primes in it&#8217;s ranges you&#8217;ve ever seen, they are far from anything you would call &#8220;highest&#8221;&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3127</link> <dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:59:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3127</guid> <description>you miss-spelled &quot;high quality&quot;, it should be &quot;in some conditions acceptable but for price not worthy&quot;. besides, what is 85mm with bokeh worse then 80-200</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you miss-spelled &#8220;high quality&#8221;, it should be &#8220;in some conditions acceptable but for price not worthy&#8221;. besides, what is 85mm with bokeh worse then 80-200</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:58:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3126</guid> <description>It is. The 85mm also states MC in its official name, and this is its package:http://www.samyang.pl/admin/galerie_produktow/samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if/xsize0/Samyang_85_1,4.jpg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is. The 85mm also states MC in its official name, and this is its package:</p><p><a
href="http://www.samyang.pl/admin/galerie_produktow/samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if/xsize0/Samyang_85_1,4.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.samyang.pl/admin/galerie_produktow/samyang_85_mm_f14_aspherical_if/xsize0/Samyang_85_1,4.jpg</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Notysarkh</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3124</link> <dc:creator>Notysarkh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:27:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3124</guid> <description>MC isn&#039;t for Multi Coated ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC isn&#8217;t for Multi Coated ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Davo</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3123</link> <dc:creator>Davo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:06:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3123</guid> <description>It says IF so it&#039;s internal focussing?? Not sure what MC stands for.
Looks promising. Hope the price is kept low.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says IF so it&#8217;s internal focussing?? Not sure what MC stands for.<br
/> Looks promising. Hope the price is kept low.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Notysarkh</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/15/samyang-14mm-f2-8-if-ed-mc-aspherical/comment-page-1/#comment-3122</link> <dc:creator>Notysarkh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:30:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1662#comment-3122</guid> <description>Samyang lenses are all MF isn&#039;t it ? Although that&#039;s not a problem with such a wide angle :)
The 85/1.4 of the same company was of high optical level, let&#039;s wait to have a review ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samyang lenses are all MF isn&#8217;t it ? Although that&#8217;s not a problem with such a wide angle <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br
/> The 85/1.4 of the same company was of high optical level, let&#8217;s wait to have a review <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 467/489 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 00:55:06 -->
