<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Samyang to continue releasing new, fast lenses</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Bob</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3660</link> <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:36:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1736#comment-3660</guid> <description>a 35mm/1.2? This would be a great addition for any Full frame camera that has Video Capability, The low light shooting at that aperture Would make it a contender for some of the top lenses available. Hope that the price would be very affordable (Wishing it wold be around $300).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a 35mm/1.2? This would be a great addition for any Full frame camera that has Video Capability, The low light shooting at that aperture Would make it a contender for some of the top lenses available. Hope that the price would be very affordable (Wishing it wold be around $300).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JSV</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3399</link> <dc:creator>JSV</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:49:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1736#comment-3399</guid> <description>Build quality isn&#039;t Samyang&#039;s strength. They&#039;re a hybrid metal-plastic body, with an interesting take on multi-coatings. The 85 does perform as well if not better than the Nikkor. This has been established by multiple reviews. Like Daikfuku, I have never tried the other lenses, but if the 85mm is any indicator of performance, then their other lenses may do just as well if not better than lenses 3-4 times more expensive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Build quality isn&#8217;t Samyang&#8217;s strength. They&#8217;re a hybrid metal-plastic body, with an interesting take on multi-coatings. The 85 does perform as well if not better than the Nikkor. This has been established by multiple reviews. Like Daikfuku, I have never tried the other lenses, but if the 85mm is any indicator of performance, then their other lenses may do just as well if not better than lenses 3-4 times more expensive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3349</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1736#comment-3349</guid> <description>I pretty much would settle for Holga quality, if it&#039;s cheap enough. Lenses with apertures around f/1.2 are a rare treat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much would settle for Holga quality, if it&#8217;s cheap enough. Lenses with apertures around f/1.2 are a rare treat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daifuku</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3326</link> <dc:creator>daifuku</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1736#comment-3326</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know anything about the other lenses from Samyang, but I can tell you from my experience that their 85mm f1.4 matches that of Nikon&#039;s in terms of optical quality. That tells me it&#039;s a bargain, and far from overpriced. But what do I know, I spend most of my time shooting instead of analyzing the technical aspects of lenses :P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about the other lenses from Samyang, but I can tell you from my experience that their 85mm f1.4 matches that of Nikon&#8217;s in terms of optical quality. That tells me it&#8217;s a bargain, and far from overpriced. But what do I know, I spend most of my time shooting instead of analyzing the technical aspects of lenses <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3300</link> <dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:13:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1736#comment-3300</guid> <description>so excited, exactly what we need! more overpriced, average to underaverage performing lenses.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so excited, exactly what we need! more overpriced, average to underaverage performing lenses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/21/samyang-to-continue-releasing-new-fast-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3291</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:09:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1736#comment-3291</guid> <description>sorry - lost few comments again, will retrieve them shortly</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry &#8211; lost few comments again, will retrieve them shortly</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 314/332 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 08:22:06 -->
