<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New redesigend Zeiss Distagon ZF 1.4/35 with floating element</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Nj</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3758</link> <dc:creator>Nj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:25:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1853#comment-3758</guid> <description>What for? AF is for sports stuff. I&#039;ve used it just once on my 5D2 (for a snapshot of a cat *g*). It&#039;s far too unreliable and causes lack of control. Get an Eg-S screen for the 5D2.. and contact lenses if this is isn&#039;t more accurate than AF at least 90% of the time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What for? AF is for sports stuff. I&#8217;ve used it just once on my 5D2 (for a snapshot of a cat *g*). It&#8217;s far too unreliable and causes lack of control. Get an Eg-S screen for the 5D2.. and contact lenses if this is isn&#8217;t more accurate than AF at least 90% of the time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3744</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:55:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1853#comment-3744</guid> <description>Yep, that&#039;s true.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that&#8217;s true.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dyna</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3742</link> <dc:creator>dyna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:00:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1853#comment-3742</guid> <description>This is, for all intents and purposes, correct. Sony essentially has exclusivity on AF designs for DSLR or other large sensor still cameras. For now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is, for all intents and purposes, correct. Sony essentially has exclusivity on AF designs for DSLR or other large sensor still cameras. For now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zeeGerman</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3734</link> <dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1853#comment-3734</guid> <description>Not sure, but maybe their deal with Sony denies them to produce AF lenses for any other system. They are a long time lens supplier for Sonys cameras, and have a good range of AF lenses, prime and zoom, for the Sony SLR line.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure, but maybe their deal with Sony denies them to produce AF lenses for any other system. They are a long time lens supplier for Sonys cameras, and have a good range of AF lenses, prime and zoom, for the Sony SLR line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3731</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:50:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1853#comment-3731</guid> <description>yeah, I agree, but why are they not adding AF? It will surely bring more buyer if they do =.=</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I agree, but why are they not adding AF? It will surely bring more buyer if they do =.=</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zeeGerman</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/09/30/new-redesigend-zeiss-distagon-1-435-with-floating-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3729</link> <dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1853#comment-3729</guid> <description>I wish they would add AF to their ZF series. Otherwise they are fantastic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish they would add AF to their ZF series. Otherwise they are fantastic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 317/343 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 09:15:09 -->
