<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sigma DP1s released</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Catastrophile</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3816</link> <dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3816</guid> <description>sounds like a fundamental downgrade.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like a fundamental downgrade.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3814</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:57:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3814</guid> <description>Out of curiosity:
They write: &quot;The maximum shutter speed is varied depending on F value.&quot; - why? The shutter and aperture are completely different components in different parts of camera. Anyone have an idea where this odd relation comes from?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity:<br
/> They write: &#8220;The maximum shutter speed is varied depending on F value.&#8221; &#8211; why? The shutter and aperture are completely different components in different parts of camera. Anyone have an idea where this odd relation comes from?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Catastrophile</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link> <dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:18:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3808</guid> <description>did you mean superfacial upgrade?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did you mean superfacial upgrade?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:35:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3806</guid> <description>it may simply mean &quot;super&quot; (better than the old one) - nothing Japanese-related.
Generally all the major producers have english-related shortcuts more than japanese-related ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may simply mean &#8220;super&#8221; (better than the old one) &#8211; nothing Japanese-related.<br
/> Generally all the major producers have english-related shortcuts more than japanese-related <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3797</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:27:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3797</guid> <description>OK cata we get it you don&#039;t like it. But seriously what does the S mean in Japanese? Anyone know?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK cata we get it you don&#8217;t like it. But seriously what does the S mean in Japanese? Anyone know?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Catastrophile</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3782</link> <dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3782</guid> <description>it may stand for one the following:Similar (to the old model)
Silly (upgrade)
Slightly (different form the old model)
Simple (job for the manufacturer)
Sister (to the old model)it certainly doesn&#039;t stand for:
Substantial (upgrade)
Sophisticated (redesign)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may stand for one the following:</p><p>Similar (to the old model)<br
/> Silly (upgrade)<br
/> Slightly (different form the old model)<br
/> Simple (job for the manufacturer)<br
/> Sister (to the old model)</p><p>it certainly doesn&#8217;t stand for:<br
/> Substantial (upgrade)<br
/> Sophisticated (redesign)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:38:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3777</guid> <description>Does the &quot;S&quot; actually stand for something in japanese?  I was thinking it was only a Nikon thingNikon D3S
canon 1DS
Sigma DP1S</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the &#8220;S&#8221; actually stand for something in japanese?  I was thinking it was only a Nikon thing</p><p>Nikon D3S<br
/> canon 1DS<br
/> Sigma DP1S</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Catastrophile</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3773</link> <dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3773</guid> <description>pathetic minor upgrade and stupid 3rd time double-fixed lens (fixed focal length + non interchangeable).  Sigma should join micro 4/3 or build a similar mirrorless system and better take care of their quality control.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pathetic minor upgrade and stupid 3rd time double-fixed lens (fixed focal length + non interchangeable).  Sigma should join micro 4/3 or build a similar mirrorless system and better take care of their quality control.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 349/373 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 21:00:20 -->
