<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma DP1s released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:06:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>sounds like a fundamental downgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like a fundamental downgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3814</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3814</guid>
		<description>Out of curiosity:
They write: &quot;The maximum shutter speed is varied depending on F value.&quot; - why? The shutter and aperture are completely different components in different parts of camera. Anyone have an idea where this odd relation comes from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity:<br />
They write: &#8220;The maximum shutter speed is varied depending on F value.&#8221; &#8211; why? The shutter and aperture are completely different components in different parts of camera. Anyone have an idea where this odd relation comes from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>did you mean superfacial upgrade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did you mean superfacial upgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>it may simply mean &quot;super&quot; (better than the old one) - nothing Japanese-related.
Generally all the major producers have english-related shortcuts more than japanese-related ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may simply mean &#8220;super&#8221; (better than the old one) &#8211; nothing Japanese-related.<br />
Generally all the major producers have english-related shortcuts more than japanese-related <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3797</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3797</guid>
		<description>OK cata we get it you don&#039;t like it. But seriously what does the S mean in Japanese? Anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK cata we get it you don&#8217;t like it. But seriously what does the S mean in Japanese? Anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3782</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3782</guid>
		<description>it may stand for one the following:

Similar (to the old model)
Silly (upgrade)
Slightly (different form the old model)  
Simple (job for the manufacturer)
Sister (to the old model)

it certainly doesn&#039;t stand for:
Substantial (upgrade)
Sophisticated (redesign)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may stand for one the following:</p>
<p>Similar (to the old model)<br />
Silly (upgrade)<br />
Slightly (different form the old model)<br />
Simple (job for the manufacturer)<br />
Sister (to the old model)</p>
<p>it certainly doesn&#8217;t stand for:<br />
Substantial (upgrade)<br />
Sophisticated (redesign)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>Does the &quot;S&quot; actually stand for something in japanese?  I was thinking it was only a Nikon thing

Nikon D3S
canon 1DS
Sigma DP1S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the &#8220;S&#8221; actually stand for something in japanese?  I was thinking it was only a Nikon thing</p>
<p>Nikon D3S<br />
canon 1DS<br />
Sigma DP1S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3773</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=1863#comment-3773</guid>
		<description>pathetic minor upgrade and stupid 3rd time double-fixed lens (fixed focal length + non interchangeable).  Sigma should join micro 4/3 or build a similar mirrorless system and better take care of their quality control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pathetic minor upgrade and stupid 3rd time double-fixed lens (fixed focal length + non interchangeable).  Sigma should join micro 4/3 or build a similar mirrorless system and better take care of their quality control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

