<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Olympus EP-1 price drop</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/10/27/olympus-ep-1-price-drop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/27/olympus-ep-1-price-drop/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/27/olympus-ep-1-price-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4127</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:53:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2021#comment-4127</guid> <description>So you&#039;re telling me people still care about the EP-1?  This camera has been exposed.  Not sure why anyone would care.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re telling me people still care about the EP-1?  This camera has been exposed.  Not sure why anyone would care.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dyna</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/10/27/olympus-ep-1-price-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4125</link> <dc:creator>dyna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:33:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2021#comment-4125</guid> <description>Bound to happen. The camera came out with a pretty good sized bang but has since dropped off dramatically.  The GH1 didn&#039;t even have a bang, more like a pop. The GF1 has a lot of curiosity surrounding it but the market seems to be waiting for more. It&#039;s like people are still not sure whether or not they can trust Olympus or Panasonic with their needs. I&#039;ll bet money the second Canon brings something to the table it&#039;ll fly. Just because it&#039;s Canon, not necessarily because it&#039;ll be any good.Got to talk with the Oly guys at PDN/PhotoPlus this past week but they were predictably not forthcoming concerning the propose 10/31 rumored announcement.  The Leica X1 is a pretty little thing, however. Always wanted me a MiniLux but I find myself in the same predicament I was back then: not being able to justify the horrendous cost.  I&#039;m not doubting it&#039;s quality... I&#039;m doubting that it&#039;s $2k worth of quality.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bound to happen. The camera came out with a pretty good sized bang but has since dropped off dramatically.  The GH1 didn&#8217;t even have a bang, more like a pop. The GF1 has a lot of curiosity surrounding it but the market seems to be waiting for more. It&#8217;s like people are still not sure whether or not they can trust Olympus or Panasonic with their needs. I&#8217;ll bet money the second Canon brings something to the table it&#8217;ll fly. Just because it&#8217;s Canon, not necessarily because it&#8217;ll be any good.</p><p>Got to talk with the Oly guys at PDN/PhotoPlus this past week but they were predictably not forthcoming concerning the propose 10/31 rumored announcement.  The Leica X1 is a pretty little thing, however. Always wanted me a MiniLux but I find myself in the same predicament I was back then: not being able to justify the horrendous cost.  I&#8217;m not doubting it&#8217;s quality&#8230; I&#8217;m doubting that it&#8217;s $2k worth of quality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 242/260 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 21:31:41 -->
