<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus E-P2: last words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/05/olympus-e-p2-last-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/05/olympus-e-p2-last-words/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Think about It</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/05/olympus-e-p2-last-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>Think about It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2176#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the typo above - &quot;reduce&quot; should read &quot;produce&quot;.  Beware excessive multi-tasking.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the typo above &#8211; &#8220;reduce&#8221; should read &#8220;produce&#8221;.  Beware excessive multi-tasking.  <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think about It</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/05/olympus-e-p2-last-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Think about It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2176#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Olympus said from the start that they&#039;re aimed at different markets.  The E-P1 is still good for the consumer market.  This is a slightly higher priced model with features that pros and more serious amateurs demand and are willing to pay a higher price for.  They&#039;re not expecting all the E-P1 buyers to rush out and upgrade.  Try to think outside of the normal new model = upgrade model and get your head around different members of the E-P family for different users.  They may well reduce a smaller version as well which would sacrifice some features for a smaller size for those that place a high importance on compact pocketability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympus said from the start that they&#8217;re aimed at different markets.  The E-P1 is still good for the consumer market.  This is a slightly higher priced model with features that pros and more serious amateurs demand and are willing to pay a higher price for.  They&#8217;re not expecting all the E-P1 buyers to rush out and upgrade.  Try to think outside of the normal new model = upgrade model and get your head around different members of the E-P family for different users.  They may well reduce a smaller version as well which would sacrifice some features for a smaller size for those that place a high importance on compact pocketability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torben</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/05/olympus-e-p2-last-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4332</link>
		<dc:creator>Torben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2176#comment-4332</guid>
		<description>Lolz @ E-P1 owners...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lolz @ E-P1 owners&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enche Tjin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/05/olympus-e-p2-last-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4328</link>
		<dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2176#comment-4328</guid>
		<description>only adding 2 optional accessories that probably not for everyone, 2 art filters and  improvement on lcd screen and black color won&#039;t cut it.

people are waiting for faster Auto Focus performance. Let&#039;s wait for the field test. If there is no improvement in this part, then it is just E-P1 in different skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only adding 2 optional accessories that probably not for everyone, 2 art filters and  improvement on lcd screen and black color won&#8217;t cut it.</p>
<p>people are waiting for faster Auto Focus performance. Let&#8217;s wait for the field test. If there is no improvement in this part, then it is just E-P1 in different skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/05/olympus-e-p2-last-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2176#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>For me the EP-2 is a Non-Event. They should have gotten it right in the previous EP-1. I have respect for Olympus, and had some of their early digitals. I still have one of them. I loved the styling of the EP-1, but as a release it was a bust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the EP-2 is a Non-Event. They should have gotten it right in the previous EP-1. I have respect for Olympus, and had some of their early digitals. I still have one of them. I loved the styling of the EP-1, but as a release it was a bust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

