<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ricoh’s mirrorless, interchangeable lenses camera &#8211; coming up on November 10th?</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/07/ricoh%e2%80%99s-mirrorless-interchangeable-lenses-camera-coming-up-on-november-10th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/07/ricoh%e2%80%99s-mirrorless-interchangeable-lenses-camera-coming-up-on-november-10th/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Catastrophile</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/07/ricoh%e2%80%99s-mirrorless-interchangeable-lenses-camera-coming-up-on-november-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-4368</link> <dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:45:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2203#comment-4368</guid> <description>it is not clear exactly what is meant by:
&quot;Electronic viewfinder accessory shoe for optional&quot;
does this mean:
1) an optional  accessory EVF that is hotshoe mountable, or
2) an additional hotshoe mount devoted for the EVF, so that it&#039;s possible to use the flash and EVF simultaneously, (unlike EP2) .
number 1 is more conventional and probable but the wording (especially &quot;accessory shoe&quot;) could also be interpreted to mean #2</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is not clear exactly what is meant by:<br
/> &#8220;Electronic viewfinder accessory shoe for optional&#8221;<br
/> does this mean:<br
/> 1) an optional  accessory EVF that is hotshoe mountable, or<br
/> 2) an additional hotshoe mount devoted for the EVF, so that it&#8217;s possible to use the flash and EVF simultaneously, (unlike EP2) .<br
/> number 1 is more conventional and probable but the wording (especially &#8220;accessory shoe&#8221;) could also be interpreted to mean #2</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/07/ricoh%e2%80%99s-mirrorless-interchangeable-lenses-camera-coming-up-on-november-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-4352</link> <dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:32:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2203#comment-4352</guid> <description>No viewfinder, no sale.  Only Panasonic seems to get it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No viewfinder, no sale.  Only Panasonic seems to get it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dyna</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/07/ricoh%e2%80%99s-mirrorless-interchangeable-lenses-camera-coming-up-on-november-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-4347</link> <dc:creator>dyna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:32:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2203#comment-4347</guid> <description>I think that translation should read: &quot;It&#039;s been a long time since Ricoh has been in the forefront of compact cameras of any quantity.&quot; or &quot;Ricoh has been trying for a long time to be in the forefront of quality compact cameras.&quot;Okay. Mean. I know. I had to.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that translation should read: &#8220;It&#8217;s been a long time since Ricoh has been in the forefront of compact cameras of any quantity.&#8221; or &#8220;Ricoh has been trying for a long time to be in the forefront of quality compact cameras.&#8221;</p><p>Okay. Mean. I know. I had to.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 265/269 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 09:47:16 -->
