<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tamron is coming up with something new (Tamron lens rumor)</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: fiatlux</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4489</link> <dc:creator>fiatlux</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:42:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4489</guid> <description>Actually, given that it is &quot;something new for Tamron Europe&quot;, I&#039;d rather bet on an online shop for direct sale of lenses.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, given that it is &#8220;something new for Tamron Europe&#8221;, I&#8217;d rather bet on an online shop for direct sale of lenses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fiatlux</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4488</link> <dc:creator>fiatlux</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:39:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4488</guid> <description>They revive the Bronica brand with a digital RF645?THAT would be worth a banner ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They revive the Bronica brand with a digital RF645?</p><p>THAT would be worth a banner <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4476</link> <dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:06:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4476</guid> <description>rofl</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rofl</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bleah!</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4460</link> <dc:creator>Bleah!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4460</guid> <description>As of now the countdown has a little tagline saying &quot;It&#039;s not a lens!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of now the countdown has a little tagline saying &#8220;It&#8217;s not a lens!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4459</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:57:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4459</guid> <description>Would love to see a 24-70 2.8 VC. Or a 17-50 F/2 with a 82 mm filter thread. I figure they can do 17-50 2.8 in a 67 mm thread they must be able to do a straight f/2!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to see a 24-70 2.8 VC. Or a 17-50 F/2 with a 82 mm filter thread. I figure they can do 17-50 2.8 in a 67 mm thread they must be able to do a straight f/2!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pcraigs</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4451</link> <dc:creator>pcraigs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:43:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4451</guid> <description>It must be their mirror-less camera with interchangeable sensor and lens mount.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be their mirror-less camera with interchangeable sensor and lens mount.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:53:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4448</guid> <description>Like Sigma&#039;s 200-500/2.8? :-P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Sigma&#8217;s 200-500/2.8? <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4446</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:03:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4446</guid> <description>LOL!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mel</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4445</link> <dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:13:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4445</guid> <description>They&#039;re going to be the company to buy Pentax.And the merged company will be renamed Tampax.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re going to be the company to buy Pentax.</p><p>And the merged company will be renamed Tampax.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chriscaflowne</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4440</link> <dc:creator>Chriscaflowne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:06:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4440</guid> <description>10-500mm f/1.2 with a new VC that allows you to handhold up to 1 hour long exposures, and a new AF motor that focus on yr subject before you even pick the camera up.  And it&#039;s the same size and weight as an 18-55 kit lens!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10-500mm f/1.2 with a new VC that allows you to handhold up to 1 hour long exposures, and a new AF motor that focus on yr subject before you even pick the camera up.  And it&#8217;s the same size and weight as an 18-55 kit lens!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4436</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4436</guid> <description>tamron 18-250mm 1.4 vc with nano coating and built like a tank</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tamron 18-250mm 1.4 vc with nano coating and built like a tank</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4429</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4429</guid> <description>impossible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>impossible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4426</link> <dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:46:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4426</guid> <description>now you stretch...i guess 18-325 fsumthin to fdark</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now you stretch&#8230;</p><p>i guess 18-325 fsumthin to fdark</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Din</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4425</link> <dc:creator>Din</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:23:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4425</guid> <description>It could be the substitute to 28-75mm f/2.8...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be the substitute to 28-75mm f/2.8&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4424</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:57:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4424</guid> <description>Or will they launch a quality control that does deliver perfect products?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or will they launch a quality control that does deliver perfect products?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwpl</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4421</link> <dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:59:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4421</guid> <description>24-70 2.8 vc would be nice</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24-70 2.8 vc would be nice</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chow</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4418</link> <dc:creator>Chow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:40:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4418</guid> <description>Tamron doesn&#039;t yet make lenses for 43. So I doubt it will do m43. But you never know. World is full of surprises :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamron doesn&#8217;t yet make lenses for 43. So I doubt it will do m43. But you never know. World is full of surprises <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4417</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:31:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4417</guid> <description>Yep, this would be possible and this would make it reasonable why they made such a loud announcement, with a big clock. Or perhaps they just made a new line of lenses?
Or VC II ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, this would be possible and this would make it reasonable why they made such a loud announcement, with a big clock. Or perhaps they just made a new line of lenses?<br
/> Or VC II ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chow</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4416</link> <dc:creator>Chow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:03:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4416</guid> <description>Ah, the first m43 lens from Tamron..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the first m43 lens from Tamron..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zeeGerman</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4413</link> <dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:46:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4413</guid> <description>maybe an ultra wide with VC?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe an ultra wide with VC?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 569/587 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 09:13:57 -->
