<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamron is coming up with something new (Tamron lens rumor)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: fiatlux</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>fiatlux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>Actually, given that it is &quot;something new for Tamron Europe&quot;, I&#039;d rather bet on an online shop for direct sale of lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, given that it is &#8220;something new for Tamron Europe&#8221;, I&#8217;d rather bet on an online shop for direct sale of lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiatlux</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4488</link>
		<dc:creator>fiatlux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4488</guid>
		<description>They revive the Bronica brand with a digital RF645?

THAT would be worth a banner ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They revive the Bronica brand with a digital RF645?</p>
<p>THAT would be worth a banner <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4476</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4476</guid>
		<description>rofl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rofl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleah!</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4460</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleah!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4460</guid>
		<description>As of now the countdown has a little tagline saying &quot;It&#039;s not a lens!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of now the countdown has a little tagline saying &#8220;It&#8217;s not a lens!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4459</guid>
		<description>Would love to see a 24-70 2.8 VC. Or a 17-50 F/2 with a 82 mm filter thread. I figure they can do 17-50 2.8 in a 67 mm thread they must be able to do a straight f/2!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to see a 24-70 2.8 VC. Or a 17-50 F/2 with a 82 mm filter thread. I figure they can do 17-50 2.8 in a 67 mm thread they must be able to do a straight f/2!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcraigs</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4451</link>
		<dc:creator>pcraigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4451</guid>
		<description>It must be their mirror-less camera with interchangeable sensor and lens mount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be their mirror-less camera with interchangeable sensor and lens mount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>Like Sigma&#039;s 200-500/2.8? :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Sigma&#8217;s 200-500/2.8? <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4446</guid>
		<description>LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re going to be the company to buy Pentax. 

And the merged company will be renamed Tampax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re going to be the company to buy Pentax. </p>
<p>And the merged company will be renamed Tampax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chriscaflowne</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>Chriscaflowne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>10-500mm f/1.2 with a new VC that allows you to handhold up to 1 hour long exposures, and a new AF motor that focus on yr subject before you even pick the camera up.  And it&#039;s the same size and weight as an 18-55 kit lens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10-500mm f/1.2 with a new VC that allows you to handhold up to 1 hour long exposures, and a new AF motor that focus on yr subject before you even pick the camera up.  And it&#8217;s the same size and weight as an 18-55 kit lens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4436</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4436</guid>
		<description>tamron 18-250mm 1.4 vc with nano coating and built like a tank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tamron 18-250mm 1.4 vc with nano coating and built like a tank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4429</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4429</guid>
		<description>impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotograf Stuttgart</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotograf Stuttgart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4426</guid>
		<description>now you stretch...

i guess 18-325 fsumthin to fdark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now you stretch&#8230;</p>
<p>i guess 18-325 fsumthin to fdark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Din</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4425</link>
		<dc:creator>Din</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4425</guid>
		<description>It could be the substitute to 28-75mm f/2.8...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be the substitute to 28-75mm f/2.8&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>Or will they launch a quality control that does deliver perfect products?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or will they launch a quality control that does deliver perfect products?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4421</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4421</guid>
		<description>24-70 2.8 vc would be nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24-70 2.8 vc would be nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chow</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4418</link>
		<dc:creator>Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4418</guid>
		<description>Tamron doesn&#039;t yet make lenses for 43. So I doubt it will do m43. But you never know. World is full of surprises :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamron doesn&#8217;t yet make lenses for 43. So I doubt it will do m43. But you never know. World is full of surprises <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4417</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4417</guid>
		<description>Yep, this would be possible and this would make it reasonable why they made such a loud announcement, with a big clock. Or perhaps they just made a new line of lenses?
Or VC II ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, this would be possible and this would make it reasonable why they made such a loud announcement, with a big clock. Or perhaps they just made a new line of lenses?<br />
Or VC II ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chow</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4416</link>
		<dc:creator>Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4416</guid>
		<description>Ah, the first m43 lens from Tamron..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the first m43 lens from Tamron..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeeGerman</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/09/tamron-is-coming-up-with-something-new-tamron-lens-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-4413</link>
		<dc:creator>zeeGerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2281#comment-4413</guid>
		<description>maybe an ultra wide with VC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe an ultra wide with VC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

