<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony a10?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Monte</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4588</link>
		<dc:creator>Monte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4588</guid>
		<description>The hot shoe is wrong.  The Alpha adapter release knob is completely off place.  This is such a fake!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hot shoe is wrong.  The Alpha adapter release knob is completely off place.  This is such a fake!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>Well, actually there would be no problem at all - less than 100 means mirrorless, 100 and more means DSLR. It&#039;s nothing like the Nikon mess.

BTW: If beta confuses with test version, than all current DSLRs of Sony are Alpha versions - internal development - blahahaha :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually there would be no problem at all &#8211; less than 100 means mirrorless, 100 and more means DSLR. It&#8217;s nothing like the Nikon mess.</p>
<p>BTW: If beta confuses with test version, than all current DSLRs of Sony are Alpha versions &#8211; internal development &#8211; blahahaha <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: le_petit_prince</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4575</link>
		<dc:creator>le_petit_prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4575</guid>
		<description>If there are making a mirror less I would love a FF body and support older MC/MD lens possible. I mean pls come out with descent adaptor gosh!

Putting bigger image sensor will make the camera bigger but m4/3 is already bigger than canon g11 or pana lx3 or Ricoh.
 
Just make it FF if they can&#039;t make way smaller APC sized boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are making a mirror less I would love a FF body and support older MC/MD lens possible. I mean pls come out with descent adaptor gosh!</p>
<p>Putting bigger image sensor will make the camera bigger but m4/3 is already bigger than canon g11 or pana lx3 or Ricoh.</p>
<p>Just make it FF if they can&#8217;t make way smaller APC sized boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angel-a</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4574</link>
		<dc:creator>angel-a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4574</guid>
		<description>old farts ... pfffffff .... look at the sony website for the REAL one!!!! there it is ... 22 mp full frame, compact body, back-illuminated sensor, 8 new lenses (mostly pancake primes)


:-)))))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>old farts &#8230; pfffffff &#8230;. look at the sony website for the REAL one!!!! there it is &#8230; 22 mp full frame, compact body, back-illuminated sensor, 8 new lenses (mostly pancake primes)</p>
<p> <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4571</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4571</guid>
		<description>Beta would actually be more suitable than Gamma or Alpha since much of what Sony is doing can be described as testing. They are the manufacturer with highest number of discontinued or extinct series (Cybershot series that had 1 or 2 models then never get updated).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beta would actually be more suitable than Gamma or Alpha since much of what Sony is doing can be described as testing. They are the manufacturer with highest number of discontinued or extinct series (Cybershot series that had 1 or 2 models then never get updated).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4570</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4570</guid>
		<description>But they will get in naming problems like Nikon if they do, they need to give it an unigue name, like y10 (gamma ten, yes, not Beta because of the confusion with test version)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they will get in naming problems like Nikon if they do, they need to give it an unigue name, like y10 (gamma ten, yes, not Beta because of the confusion with test version)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4568</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4568</guid>
		<description>Fake - yea, but looks very nice :) Good work to whoever made it.
I also like the concept of names - A10 up to A90 for E.V.I.L. cameras, while A100 all the way up for DSLRs :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake &#8211; yea, but looks very nice <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Good work to whoever made it.<br />
I also like the concept of names &#8211; A10 up to A90 for E.V.I.L. cameras, while A100 all the way up for DSLRs <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huggs</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4567</link>
		<dc:creator>Huggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4567</guid>
		<description>Kinda plain for a Sony. Fake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda plain for a Sony. Fake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>May a brand new full frame CCD (CCD will be better) be in it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May a brand new full frame CCD (CCD will be better) be in it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_M</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>This is faked in ms paint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is faked in ms paint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4563</guid>
		<description>more like the GF1 from panasonic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more like the GF1 from panasonic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RN</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>RN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>Stop posting obvious fakes. That&#039;s a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop posting obvious fakes. That&#8217;s a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MH</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4560</link>
		<dc:creator>MH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4560</guid>
		<description>Thats´s no sony hotshoe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats´s no sony hotshoe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBL</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>JBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>What is this one supposed to be? some G11 camera? that would work... the bigger the sensor the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this one supposed to be? some G11 camera? that would work&#8230; the bigger the sensor the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4558</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4558</guid>
		<description>i hope the new evil sony will look like this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope the new evil sony will look like this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/16/sony-a10/comment-page-1/#comment-4557</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2322#comment-4557</guid>
		<description>It looks like a Panasonic with Sony features cloned in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a Panasonic with Sony features cloned in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

