<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Polaroid plans for 2010</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4675</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:54:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4675</guid> <description>Also, there&#039;s no shortage of Polaroid cameras in the world. There must be a billion One Step-like cheap cameras in the world, that have had a maximum of ten exposures put though them. The shortage is in film. If they&#039;d come out with a new SX-70 or SLR680, that would actually mean something.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, there&#8217;s no shortage of Polaroid cameras in the world. There must be a billion One Step-like cheap cameras in the world, that have had a maximum of ten exposures put though them. The shortage is in film. If they&#8217;d come out with a new SX-70 or SLR680, that would actually mean something.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4674</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:50:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4674</guid> <description>Too bad 55 &amp; 665 are gone forever. A black &amp; white integral film will be interesting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad 55 &amp; 665 are gone forever. A black &amp; white integral film will be interesting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4670</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4670</guid> <description>I think this will fly.... Digital capture with an ability to make small exposure/white balance/fish eye effect etc and then print right from thr camera. Makes sense to me in the digital age.  If they are cheeky, they could copy Canon&#039;s dedicated print button. That would be funny. A dedicated print button that actually has some usefulness!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will fly&#8230;. Digital capture with an ability to make small exposure/white balance/fish eye effect etc and then print right from thr camera. Makes sense to me in the digital age.  If they are cheeky, they could copy Canon&#8217;s dedicated print button. That would be funny. A dedicated print button that actually has some usefulness!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lorenzo</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4669</link> <dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:55:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4669</guid> <description>Well, at least we will be able to make a believable remake of &quot;Memento&quot;...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least we will be able to make a believable remake of &#8220;Memento&#8221;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 276/294 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 23:15:25 -->
