<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polaroid plans for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4675</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4675</guid>
		<description>Also, there&#039;s no shortage of Polaroid cameras in the world. There must be a billion One Step-like cheap cameras in the world, that have had a maximum of ten exposures put though them. The shortage is in film. If they&#039;d come out with a new SX-70 or SLR680, that would actually mean something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, there&#8217;s no shortage of Polaroid cameras in the world. There must be a billion One Step-like cheap cameras in the world, that have had a maximum of ten exposures put though them. The shortage is in film. If they&#8217;d come out with a new SX-70 or SLR680, that would actually mean something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4674</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4674</guid>
		<description>Too bad 55 &amp; 665 are gone forever. A black &amp; white integral film will be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad 55 &amp; 665 are gone forever. A black &amp; white integral film will be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4670</guid>
		<description>I think this will fly.... Digital capture with an ability to make small exposure/white balance/fish eye effect etc and then print right from thr camera. Makes sense to me in the digital age.  If they are cheeky, they could copy Canon&#039;s dedicated print button. That would be funny. A dedicated print button that actually has some usefulness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will fly&#8230;. Digital capture with an ability to make small exposure/white balance/fish eye effect etc and then print right from thr camera. Makes sense to me in the digital age.  If they are cheeky, they could copy Canon&#8217;s dedicated print button. That would be funny. A dedicated print button that actually has some usefulness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/24/polaroid-plans-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2379#comment-4669</guid>
		<description>Well, at least we will be able to make a believable remake of &quot;Memento&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least we will be able to make a believable remake of &#8220;Memento&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

