<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Pentax 645D details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S.</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4764</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4764</guid>
		<description>What HD video?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What HD video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGo</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>LGo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>A higher resolution sensor will not make any difference in HD video.  a 1080p video will be a 1080p video.  The camera&#039;s low-light performance will have a bigger impact on video than its sensor resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A higher resolution sensor will not make any difference in HD video.  a 1080p video will be a 1080p video.  The camera&#8217;s low-light performance will have a bigger impact on video than its sensor resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>Well, the Arsat 30mm can be found with Pentax 645 mount, AFAIK, and it is supposed to be an excellent + lens (manual focus) for not much more than 300 dollars...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Arsat 30mm can be found with Pentax 645 mount, AFAIK, and it is supposed to be an excellent + lens (manual focus) for not much more than 300 dollars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill D.</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>The multiplication factor is 0.6, so the equivalent focal length in the 35mm format would be 18mm. However, there is no 30mm lens for the Pentax 645 system to date; the widest was a 35mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The multiplication factor is 0.6, so the equivalent focal length in the 35mm format would be 18mm. However, there is no 30mm lens for the Pentax 645 system to date; the widest was a 35mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBL</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>JBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>What is the focal length equivalent to 35mm full frame sensor with a 30mm lens on a 645?

How wide is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the focal length equivalent to 35mm full frame sensor with a 30mm lens on a 645?</p>
<p>How wide is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff-C</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff-C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>The pixel configuration looks very similar to Kodak&#039;s KAF-39000:

http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/business/ISS/productsummary/FullFrame/KAF-39000ProductSummary.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pixel configuration looks very similar to Kodak&#8217;s KAF-39000:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/business/ISS/productsummary/FullFrame/KAF-39000ProductSummary.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/business/ISS/productsummary/FullFrame/KAF-39000ProductSummary.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4719</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing this.  Medium format news/gossip is should be of great interest to us also.  It will be very interesting to see the price. 

I got a Phase One and love it.  It is low end (lowest cost) one they have.  The bigger sensor is great,  I have made some 20x20 inch prints and they look great,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing this.  Medium format news/gossip is should be of great interest to us also.  It will be very interesting to see the price. </p>
<p>I got a Phase One and love it.  It is low end (lowest cost) one they have.  The bigger sensor is great,  I have made some 20&#215;20 inch prints and they look great,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4718</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4718</guid>
		<description>The 39MP (actually 39.5MP, I updated the post) came from the text above the picture on the Chinese forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 39MP (actually 39.5MP, I updated the post) came from the text above the picture on the Chinese forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4717</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4717</guid>
		<description>I was asked the same question on LeicaRumors and here is the same answer: I was getting an average of 20 votes per post. This is less than 1% of the visitors of this site and don&#039;t think this is a good feedback. I also removed it on LeicaRumors where I was getting less than 0.3% feedback, but I left it on NikonRumors because the % of voting readers there is much higher. If you all guys promise to vote, I will bring it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was asked the same question on LeicaRumors and here is the same answer: I was getting an average of 20 votes per post. This is less than 1% of the visitors of this site and don&#8217;t think this is a good feedback. I also removed it on LeicaRumors where I was getting less than 0.3% feedback, but I left it on NikonRumors because the % of voting readers there is much higher. If you all guys promise to vote, I will bring it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon x2</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4716</link>
		<dc:creator>jon x2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4716</guid>
		<description>what happened to the like it/dislike it button?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what happened to the like it/dislike it button?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmertz</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4715</link>
		<dc:creator>fmertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4715</guid>
		<description>Now tell me the one about the three bears!
Pentax has been promising this camera for so long, fairy tale is the only thing to call it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now tell me the one about the three bears!<br />
Pentax has been promising this camera for so long, fairy tale is the only thing to call it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S.</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4714</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4714</guid>
		<description>Even if such adaptation will be possible, you will lose the AF.
But why worry about lenses? At least some from the list below should be OK:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/imaging/filmcamera/lens/index645n2_list.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if such adaptation will be possible, you will lose the AF.<br />
But why worry about lenses? At least some from the list below should be OK:<br />
<a href="http://www.pentax.jp/english/imaging/filmcamera/lens/index645n2_list.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pentax.jp/english/imaging/filmcamera/lens/index645n2_list.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S.</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4713</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4713</guid>
		<description>Of course; but there is a higher possibility it might be genuine.
Btw, I don&#039;t see any &#039;39MP&#039; on that first page, kanji included. Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course; but there is a higher possibility it might be genuine.<br />
Btw, I don&#8217;t see any &#8217;39MP&#8217; on that first page, kanji included. Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4712</guid>
		<description>with an adapter it may take the new Leica S lenses, which are very modern, with AF and intended for a digital. but Leica S format is a bit smaller than 645, 45x30mm vs 56x42mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with an adapter it may take the new Leica S lenses, which are very modern, with AF and intended for a digital. but Leica S format is a bit smaller than 645, 45x30mm vs 56x42mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>yep i know that some pentax official said it&#039;s coming (in spring 2010), but that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that these purported two manual pages are true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep i know that some pentax official said it&#8217;s coming (in spring 2010), but that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that these purported two manual pages are true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4710</guid>
		<description>I will believe it when I see it. However, it would be great, if true. So many old legacy lenses. Not only original Pentax ones, but also Russian / Ucrainian ones adapted by third parties (e.g. the 30mm, which is a bit spoiled with this sensor&#039;s size, however; or the Zeiss Yena usable via adaptor...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will believe it when I see it. However, it would be great, if true. So many old legacy lenses. Not only original Pentax ones, but also Russian / Ucrainian ones adapted by third parties (e.g. the 30mm, which is a bit spoiled with this sensor&#8217;s size, however; or the Zeiss Yena usable via adaptor&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S.</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4709</guid>
		<description>The 645 Digital is expected on the market spring 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 645 Digital is expected on the market spring 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S.</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4708</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4708</guid>
		<description>It will use the Pentax 645 mount, legacy of Pentax medium format 645&#039;s line. This mean there are already quite a few lenses available, including autofocus ones.
Price - it could be in line with top of the range Canon/Nikon cameras - this would be amazing; but let&#039;s wait for some real information.
No movie mode, I bet; probably not even live view. I doubt the KAF39000 sensor supports either ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will use the Pentax 645 mount, legacy of Pentax medium format 645&#8242;s line. This mean there are already quite a few lenses available, including autofocus ones.<br />
Price &#8211; it could be in line with top of the range Canon/Nikon cameras &#8211; this would be amazing; but let&#8217;s wait for some real information.<br />
No movie mode, I bet; probably not even live view. I doubt the KAF39000 sensor supports either <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4707</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4707</guid>
		<description>was thinking about the same question, and if am not wrong there used to be pantax medium format lenses in film days, but even if these exist, they will need updating the same way C &amp; N updated most of their 35mm lenses in the digital era. among many other reasons, digital lenses need special anti-ghosting coating because of the mirror-like reflectivity of sensors as opposed to films. 

given how the rumors have been on &amp; off on this camera, i&#039;m a bit skiptical about this episode with just a purported two pages from the manual, easy to fake, if someone had the manual, he would show the specs page above all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was thinking about the same question, and if am not wrong there used to be pantax medium format lenses in film days, but even if these exist, they will need updating the same way C &amp; N updated most of their 35mm lenses in the digital era. among many other reasons, digital lenses need special anti-ghosting coating because of the mirror-like reflectivity of sensors as opposed to films. </p>
<p>given how the rumors have been on &amp; off on this camera, i&#8217;m a bit skiptical about this episode with just a purported two pages from the manual, easy to fake, if someone had the manual, he would show the specs page above all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBL</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/11/27/more-pentax-645d-details/comment-page-1/#comment-4706</link>
		<dc:creator>JBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2414#comment-4706</guid>
		<description>Hmm this is interesting.

What lens does it support? a new set of lenses I guess.. ?
How much is it going to be?
I&#039;d love a movie mode even if its just 1080p, on this kind of sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm this is interesting.</p>
<p>What lens does it support? a new set of lenses I guess.. ?<br />
How much is it going to be?<br />
I&#8217;d love a movie mode even if its just 1080p, on this kind of sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

