<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Some Sigma rumors &#8211; new 17-70mm lens next week</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: alan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-4843</link> <dc:creator>alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:15:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2472#comment-4843</guid> <description>actually it&#039;s already been announced by Sigma., perhaps your posting speeded things up?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually it&#8217;s already been announced by Sigma., perhaps your posting speeded things up?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:46:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2472#comment-4814</guid> <description>it&#039;s a great replacement for kit lens in &quot;other-than-Canikon&quot; systems - those with stabilized sensor. I think that&#039;s why they decided to make an OS version - to better compete with biggest systems lenses.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a great replacement for kit lens in &#8220;other-than-Canikon&#8221; systems &#8211; those with stabilized sensor. I think that&#8217;s why they decided to make an OS version &#8211; to better compete with biggest systems lenses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-4812</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:52:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2472#comment-4812</guid> <description>sorry, I do not have more info - my guess is that the 17-70 will be APS-C</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, I do not have more info &#8211; my guess is that the 17-70 will be APS-C</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-4810</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:00:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2472#comment-4810</guid> <description>This is a fine lens even without the OS. I suspect it is one of Sigma&#039;s bestsellers. There are tens of thousands of photos on photo-sharing sites taken with this lens.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fine lens even without the OS. I suspect it is one of Sigma&#8217;s bestsellers. There are tens of thousands of photos on photo-sharing sites taken with this lens.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dude</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-4809</link> <dc:creator>dude</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:31:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2472#comment-4809</guid> <description>for fullframe? or APS-C?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for fullframe? or APS-C?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-4802</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:47:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2472#comment-4802</guid> <description>Well, the old version is gone from Sigma&#039;s german webpage (www.sigma-foto.de), neither the HSM nor the non-HSM lenses are listed. The HSM is still there on the US-site... Anyone wants to dig out some history on come-true rumors from the german Internet?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the old version is gone from Sigma&#8217;s german webpage (www.sigma-foto.de), neither the HSM nor the non-HSM lenses are listed. The HSM is still there on the US-site&#8230; Anyone wants to dig out some history on come-true rumors from the german Internet?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ossme</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/02/some-sigma-rumors-new-17-70mm-lens-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link> <dc:creator>ossme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:09:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2472#comment-4799</guid> <description>sigma 70-200mm F2.8 OS would be a very good contender</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sigma 70-200mm F2.8 OS would be a very good contender</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 333/341 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 08:12:45 -->
