<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Another Pentax lens?</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4992</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4992</guid> <description>that a bad photoshop job</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that a bad photoshop job</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Driver8</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4965</link> <dc:creator>Driver8</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4965</guid> <description>Is that Tiger Woods?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that Tiger Woods?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: soley</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4964</link> <dc:creator>soley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:28:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4964</guid> <description>It is fun to read this comments. In an Italian Pentax forum some very experienced users stated the pic of the new WR lens was a fake, a digital work etc... 2  days later the lens is official! Of course lights are fake and the lens never so that lake, so to say, it is just a commercial image. But the point is: experts, the lens will look like this, guess length and max aperture, noobs like me will thx you!   :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is fun to read this comments. In an Italian Pentax forum some very experienced users stated the pic of the new WR lens was a fake, a digital work etc&#8230; 2  days later the lens is official! Of course lights are fake and the lens never so that lake, so to say, it is just a commercial image. But the point is: experts, the lens will look like this, guess length and max aperture, noobs like me will thx you! <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jr</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4963</link> <dc:creator>jr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:20:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4963</guid> <description>oh god that is so fake. look at the bottom of the lens by his hand. the lens has been pasted on top of another one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh god that is so fake. look at the bottom of the lens by his hand. the lens has been pasted on top of another one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous Coward</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4962</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:52:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4962</guid> <description>Seriously?  The lighting on the guy is coming from behind his shoulders.  The lighting on the lens/camera is coming from front-left.  The front of his body is in shadow, but the lens/camera has highlights.  Total photoshop job.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously?  The lighting on the guy is coming from behind his shoulders.  The lighting on the lens/camera is coming from front-left.  The front of his body is in shadow, but the lens/camera has highlights.  Total photoshop job.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4961</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:46:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4961</guid> <description>I named the file based on the &quot;guess&quot; from PentaxForum.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I named the file based on the &#8220;guess&#8221; from PentaxForum.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glen</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4960</link> <dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4960</guid> <description>If you place your mouse on it. It says it is Da 400 F4 SDA IF</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you place your mouse on it. It says it is Da 400 F4 SDA IF</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4959</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4959</guid> <description>That just looks like the smc  DA  200mm F2.8 lens without a lens hood.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just looks like the smc  DA  200mm F2.8 lens without a lens hood.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JBerardi</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4958</link> <dc:creator>JBerardi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:38:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4958</guid> <description>It&#039;s &#039;chopped. Badly. The lighting on the lens/camera is completely wrong.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8216;chopped. Badly. The lighting on the lens/camera is completely wrong.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Oliver Richter</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4955</link> <dc:creator>Oliver Richter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:41:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4955</guid> <description>Pentax D FA 4/300 WR</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pentax D FA 4/300 WR</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 382/402 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 21:03:18 -->
