<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Pentax lens?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:12:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4992</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4992</guid>
		<description>that a bad photoshop job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that a bad photoshop job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driver8</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4965</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4965</guid>
		<description>Is that Tiger Woods?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that Tiger Woods?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soley</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4964</link>
		<dc:creator>soley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4964</guid>
		<description>It is fun to read this comments. In an Italian Pentax forum some very experienced users stated the pic of the new WR lens was a fake, a digital work etc... 2  days later the lens is official! Of course lights are fake and the lens never so that lake, so to say, it is just a commercial image. But the point is: experts, the lens will look like this, guess length and max aperture, noobs like me will thx you!   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is fun to read this comments. In an Italian Pentax forum some very experienced users stated the pic of the new WR lens was a fake, a digital work etc&#8230; 2  days later the lens is official! Of course lights are fake and the lens never so that lake, so to say, it is just a commercial image. But the point is: experts, the lens will look like this, guess length and max aperture, noobs like me will thx you!   <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4963</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4963</guid>
		<description>oh god that is so fake. look at the bottom of the lens by his hand. the lens has been pasted on top of another one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh god that is so fake. look at the bottom of the lens by his hand. the lens has been pasted on top of another one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4962</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4962</guid>
		<description>Seriously?  The lighting on the guy is coming from behind his shoulders.  The lighting on the lens/camera is coming from front-left.  The front of his body is in shadow, but the lens/camera has highlights.  Total photoshop job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously?  The lighting on the guy is coming from behind his shoulders.  The lighting on the lens/camera is coming from front-left.  The front of his body is in shadow, but the lens/camera has highlights.  Total photoshop job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4961</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4961</guid>
		<description>I named the file based on the &quot;guess&quot; from PentaxForum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I named the file based on the &#8220;guess&#8221; from PentaxForum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4960</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4960</guid>
		<description>If you place your mouse on it. It says it is Da 400 F4 SDA IF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you place your mouse on it. It says it is Da 400 F4 SDA IF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4959</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4959</guid>
		<description>That just looks like the smc  DA  200mm F2.8 lens without a lens hood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just looks like the smc  DA  200mm F2.8 lens without a lens hood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBerardi</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator>JBerardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4958</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &#039;chopped. Badly. The lighting on the lens/camera is completely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8216;chopped. Badly. The lighting on the lens/camera is completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Richter</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2009/12/10/another-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4955</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Richter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2540#comment-4955</guid>
		<description>Pentax D FA 4/300 WR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pentax D FA 4/300 WR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

