<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Some Olympus rumors (new EP-3 and E520 replacement)</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: SteveD</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-5217</link> <dc:creator>SteveD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:12:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2793#comment-5217</guid> <description>E-P3 could be an &quot;SLR style&quot; mFT along the lines of a 7/8 scale OM-1 with IBIS, AF assist, built in hi-res EVF and long awaited flip LCD of non-stone ages (i.e., usual Olympus 230MP) resolution.  Only 1 1/2 years behind Panny&#039;s G1, so better be something special.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-P3 could be an &#8220;SLR style&#8221; mFT along the lines of a 7/8 scale OM-1 with IBIS, AF assist, built in hi-res EVF and long awaited flip LCD of non-stone ages (i.e., usual Olympus 230MP) resolution.  Only 1 1/2 years behind Panny&#8217;s G1, so better be something special.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fotograf nunta Iasi</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-5210</link> <dc:creator>fotograf nunta Iasi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:14:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2793#comment-5210</guid> <description>That EP-3 must be really nice if EP-2 will be discontinued so soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That EP-3 must be really nice if EP-2 will be discontinued so soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-5208</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:33:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2793#comment-5208</guid> <description>Seems like it lately!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like it lately!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sky</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-5206</link> <dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:15:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2793#comment-5206</guid> <description>agreed.but still it&#039;s kinda pathetic... I mean... next episodes of never-ending novel produced by EA called &quot;FIFA&quot; are published less often than Olympus cameras!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.</p><p>but still it&#8217;s kinda pathetic&#8230; I mean&#8230; next episodes of never-ending novel produced by EA called &#8220;FIFA&#8221; are published less often than Olympus cameras!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Polis</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-5205</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Polis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:23:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2793#comment-5205</guid> <description>How does that work?  Does the camera they purchased get worse?  Lose anything?  No.  Releasing a subsequent product hardly &#039;screws&#039; anyone.  I suppose those few people who have to have the latest and greatest would then have to get another camera, but that is a choice and not one Olympus made.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does that work?  Does the camera they purchased get worse?  Lose anything?  No.  Releasing a subsequent product hardly &#8216;screws&#8217; anyone.  I suppose those few people who have to have the latest and greatest would then have to get another camera, but that is a choice and not one Olympus made.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NSXType-R</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/03/some-olympus-rumors-new-ep-3-and-e520-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-5203</link> <dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:00:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2793#comment-5203</guid> <description>I thought the EP-2 just came out!Olympus really likes screwing early adopters huh?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the EP-2 just came out!</p><p>Olympus really likes screwing early adopters huh?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 311/335 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 08:49:11 -->
