<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Two new lenses coming from Tamron</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Frey</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5460</link> <dc:creator>Frey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:44:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5460</guid> <description>Wish they would release 70-200mm f/2.8 with VC (and with better AF performance)...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish they would release 70-200mm f/2.8 with VC (and with better AF performance)&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Notysarkh</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link> <dc:creator>Notysarkh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5365</guid> <description>Do you owe some to say such things ?
Some lenses are really interesting, like 60 &amp; 90 macro, 17-50/2.8 (VC or not), 28-75, 70-200/2.8, 18-270 VC and 70-300.
Tamron&#039;s lenses are cheap but you really gets bang for your bucks !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you owe some to say such things ?<br
/> Some lenses are really interesting, like 60 &amp; 90 macro, 17-50/2.8 (VC or not), 28-75, 70-200/2.8, 18-270 VC and 70-300.<br
/> Tamron&#8217;s lenses are cheap but you really gets bang for your bucks !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: K. Artur</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5363</link> <dc:creator>K. Artur</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:46:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5363</guid> <description>Tamron sucks. Their lenses are boring, ugly and cheap-looking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamron sucks. Their lenses are boring, ugly and cheap-looking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mortuus</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5321</link> <dc:creator>mortuus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:26:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5321</guid> <description>i dont expect much from image quality..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont expect much from image quality..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5311</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:33:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5311</guid> <description>Now that they are updating their lenses to VC (like Sigma did last with their 70-300 OS non-HSM as well) they are still lacking in the HSM/SWM/USM department. Whenever that hits the street, Tamron becomes more interesting. Yes I read about the 60/2.0 macro to have a sort of silent motor, but reviews I read said it still squeaks a lot!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that they are updating their lenses to VC (like Sigma did last with their 70-300 OS non-HSM as well) they are still lacking in the HSM/SWM/USM department. Whenever that hits the street, Tamron becomes more interesting. Yes I read about the 60/2.0 macro to have a sort of silent motor, but reviews I read said it still squeaks a lot!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 299/305 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 00:33:24 -->
