<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two new lenses coming from Tamron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before they happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Frey</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5460</link>
		<dc:creator>Frey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5460</guid>
		<description>Wish they would release 70-200mm f/2.8 with VC (and with better AF performance)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish they would release 70-200mm f/2.8 with VC (and with better AF performance)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notysarkh</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>Notysarkh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5365</guid>
		<description>Do you owe some to say such things ?
Some lenses are really interesting, like 60 &amp; 90 macro, 17-50/2.8 (VC or not), 28-75, 70-200/2.8, 18-270 VC and 70-300.
Tamron&#039;s lenses are cheap but you really gets bang for your bucks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you owe some to say such things ?<br />
Some lenses are really interesting, like 60 &amp; 90 macro, 17-50/2.8 (VC or not), 28-75, 70-200/2.8, 18-270 VC and 70-300.<br />
Tamron&#8217;s lenses are cheap but you really gets bang for your bucks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Artur</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5363</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Artur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5363</guid>
		<description>Tamron sucks. Their lenses are boring, ugly and cheap-looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamron sucks. Their lenses are boring, ugly and cheap-looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mortuus</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5321</link>
		<dc:creator>mortuus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5321</guid>
		<description>i dont expect much from image quality..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont expect much from image quality..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoutK89</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/08/two-new-lenses-coming-from-tamron/comment-page-1/#comment-5311</link>
		<dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2877#comment-5311</guid>
		<description>Now that they are updating their lenses to VC (like Sigma did last with their 70-300 OS non-HSM as well) they are still lacking in the HSM/SWM/USM department. Whenever that hits the street, Tamron becomes more interesting. Yes I read about the 60/2.0 macro to have a sort of silent motor, but reviews I read said it still squeaks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that they are updating their lenses to VC (like Sigma did last with their 70-300 OS non-HSM as well) they are still lacking in the HSM/SWM/USM department. Whenever that hits the street, Tamron becomes more interesting. Yes I read about the 60/2.0 macro to have a sort of silent motor, but reviews I read said it still squeaks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
