<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Canon EOS 2000D and EOS 6000D?</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/18/canon-eos-2000d-and-eos-6000d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/18/canon-eos-2000d-and-eos-6000d/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: niels</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/18/canon-eos-2000d-and-eos-6000d/comment-page-1/#comment-5473</link> <dc:creator>niels</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:38:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2949#comment-5473</guid> <description>The 2000D and the 6000D must be the D2000 and the D6000. Some old dSLR bodies. I have seen this already on some forums.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2000D and the 6000D must be the D2000 and the D6000. Some old dSLR bodies. I have seen this already on some forums.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Micha</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/18/canon-eos-2000d-and-eos-6000d/comment-page-1/#comment-5470</link> <dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2949#comment-5470</guid> <description>I bet those are the very old, already discontinued models that are listed as D2000 and D6000 in the camera museum:From time to time, someone stumples upon these and thinks those are new, unannounced models...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet those are the very old, already discontinued models that are listed as D2000 and D6000 in the camera museum:</p><p>From time to time, someone stumples upon these and thinks those are new, unannounced models&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/18/canon-eos-2000d-and-eos-6000d/comment-page-1/#comment-5472</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:43:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2949#comment-5472</guid> <description>And then people complain about the Nikon name giving :-P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then people complain about the Nikon name giving <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/18/canon-eos-2000d-and-eos-6000d/comment-page-1/#comment-5469</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:57:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2949#comment-5469</guid> <description>also 5D2 500D 1000D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also 5D2 500D 1000D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/18/canon-eos-2000d-and-eos-6000d/comment-page-1/#comment-5468</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:56:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2949#comment-5468</guid> <description>50D 7D 1D4 not on the list?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>50D 7D 1D4 not on the list?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 302/308 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 23:56:49 -->
