<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ricoh CX3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/19/ricoh-cx3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/19/ricoh-cx3/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/19/ricoh-cx3/comment-page-1/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2985#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>Mess up a great little camera by trying to make it a video camera?  Hope the CX3 is a bit more exciting than just HD Video - otherwise a nice cheaper CX2 would be great.

Death of the GX model leaves room for the CX3 to close the gap a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mess up a great little camera by trying to make it a video camera?  Hope the CX3 is a bit more exciting than just HD Video &#8211; otherwise a nice cheaper CX2 would be great.</p>
<p>Death of the GX model leaves room for the CX3 to close the gap a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loickeri</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/19/ricoh-cx3/comment-page-1/#comment-5495</link>
		<dc:creator>loickeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2985#comment-5495</guid>
		<description>bullshit video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bullshit video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

