<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Panasonic cameras to be announced for PMA</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Fred</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5521</link> <dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:26:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5521</guid> <description>As a LX3 user, I can tell you a really pocketable 24mm is something very different from a GF1+40mm.
Actually, the LX3 even gives the angle of a 22mm on the GF1, thanks to its true multi-format : at 16/9 it is 2mm wider than on 4/3 position. (The GH1 has the same multi-format, but not the GF1.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a LX3 user, I can tell you a really pocketable 24mm is something very different from a GF1+40mm.<br
/> Actually, the LX3 even gives the angle of a 22mm on the GF1, thanks to its true multi-format : at 16/9 it is 2mm wider than on 4/3 position. (The GH1 has the same multi-format, but not the GF1.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5516</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:02:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5516</guid> <description>+1Plus, the GF1 has a sucky 1/160s flash sync, while LX3 has 1/2000s.
With a faster flash sync, I&#039;d have bought the GF1+pancake in a heartbeat.
I sure hope Panasonic doesn&#039;t stop its LXx line.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p><p>Plus, the GF1 has a sucky 1/160s flash sync, while LX3 has 1/2000s.<br
/> With a faster flash sync, I&#8217;d have bought the GF1+pancake in a heartbeat.<br
/> I sure hope Panasonic doesn&#8217;t stop its LXx line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5512</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:09:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5512</guid> <description>Not sure that the GF1 is a true replacement for LX3. Although small for a camera with interchangeable lenses, the GF1 is, with a 14-45 lens (the nearest currently available equivalent to the LX3 lens), noticeably larger than the LX3, as well as costing 70% more (£550 vs £320). This lens is also f3.5-5.6 whereas the LX3 lens is f2.0-2.8. If it was to be my only camera, then maybe I would go for the GF1, but as a supplement to an SLR, I would rather go for the LX3 (particularly for its smaller size and brighter lens).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that the GF1 is a true replacement for LX3. Although small for a camera with interchangeable lenses, the GF1 is, with a 14-45 lens (the nearest currently available equivalent to the LX3 lens), noticeably larger than the LX3, as well as costing 70% more (£550 vs £320). This lens is also f3.5-5.6 whereas the LX3 lens is f2.0-2.8. If it was to be my only camera, then maybe I would go for the GF1, but as a supplement to an SLR, I would rather go for the LX3 (particularly for its smaller size and brighter lens).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5505</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:28:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5505</guid> <description>Niko, I will have to agree with you again:)
That&#039;s why I think they will remove the RAW mode and just make it their top p&amp;s camera, the GF1 is the actual replacement of the LX3 in my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niko, I will have to agree with you again:)<br
/> That&#8217;s why I think they will remove the RAW mode and just make it their top p&amp;s camera, the GF1 is the actual replacement of the LX3 in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5504</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:07:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5504</guid> <description>How relevent is a LX3 replacement now that the GF1 and similar EVIL cameras are available? Not to mention that true DSLRs are at the same price range now. I don&#039;t think the LX4 will be as popular as the LX3 unless it brings something new to the table.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How relevent is a LX3 replacement now that the GF1 and similar EVIL cameras are available? Not to mention that true DSLRs are at the same price range now. I don&#8217;t think the LX4 will be as popular as the LX3 unless it brings something new to the table.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5501</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5501</guid> <description>Sounds more like a replacement for the DMC-TZ7 (aka DMC-ZS3) given the lack of RAW mode. Addition of full manual control to this model would seem like a natural step as does GPS. Would 720p HD video be AVCHD Lite that is already present on the DMC-TZ7. Note it is almost exactly 12 months since launch of DMC-TZ7 and two years since launch of DMC-TZ5.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds more like a replacement for the DMC-TZ7 (aka DMC-ZS3) given the lack of RAW mode. Addition of full manual control to this model would seem like a natural step as does GPS. Would 720p HD video be AVCHD Lite that is already present on the DMC-TZ7. Note it is almost exactly 12 months since launch of DMC-TZ7 and two years since launch of DMC-TZ5.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5499</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:30:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5499</guid> <description>..and what about a new 4/3, all lenses from Panasonic 4/3 are back at Amazon .fr they were unavailable for a while and the 4/3 rumors posted a rumors about a new DSLR ,with mirror ,from Panasonic and Olympus!!!!! With a new sensor!!!!!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and what about a new 4/3, all lenses from Panasonic 4/3 are back at Amazon .fr they were unavailable for a while and the 4/3 rumors posted a rumors about a new DSLR ,with mirror ,from Panasonic and Olympus!!!!! With a new sensor!!!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 331/355 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 08:19:04 -->
