<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Panasonic cameras to be announced for PMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5521</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5521</guid>
		<description>As a LX3 user, I can tell you a really pocketable 24mm is something very different from a GF1+40mm.
Actually, the LX3 even gives the angle of a 22mm on the GF1, thanks to its true multi-format : at 16/9 it is 2mm wider than on 4/3 position. (The GH1 has the same multi-format, but not the GF1.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a LX3 user, I can tell you a really pocketable 24mm is something very different from a GF1+40mm.<br />
Actually, the LX3 even gives the angle of a 22mm on the GF1, thanks to its true multi-format : at 16/9 it is 2mm wider than on 4/3 position. (The GH1 has the same multi-format, but not the GF1.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5516</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5516</guid>
		<description>+1

Plus, the GF1 has a sucky 1/160s flash sync, while LX3 has 1/2000s.
With a faster flash sync, I&#039;d have bought the GF1+pancake in a heartbeat.
I sure hope Panasonic doesn&#039;t stop its LXx line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
<p>Plus, the GF1 has a sucky 1/160s flash sync, while LX3 has 1/2000s.<br />
With a faster flash sync, I&#8217;d have bought the GF1+pancake in a heartbeat.<br />
I sure hope Panasonic doesn&#8217;t stop its LXx line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5512</guid>
		<description>Not sure that the GF1 is a true replacement for LX3. Although small for a camera with interchangeable lenses, the GF1 is, with a 14-45 lens (the nearest currently available equivalent to the LX3 lens), noticeably larger than the LX3, as well as costing 70% more (£550 vs £320). This lens is also f3.5-5.6 whereas the LX3 lens is f2.0-2.8. If it was to be my only camera, then maybe I would go for the GF1, but as a supplement to an SLR, I would rather go for the LX3 (particularly for its smaller size and brighter lens).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that the GF1 is a true replacement for LX3. Although small for a camera with interchangeable lenses, the GF1 is, with a 14-45 lens (the nearest currently available equivalent to the LX3 lens), noticeably larger than the LX3, as well as costing 70% more (£550 vs £320). This lens is also f3.5-5.6 whereas the LX3 lens is f2.0-2.8. If it was to be my only camera, then maybe I would go for the GF1, but as a supplement to an SLR, I would rather go for the LX3 (particularly for its smaller size and brighter lens).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5505</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5505</guid>
		<description>Niko, I will have to agree with you again:)
That&#039;s why I think they will remove the RAW mode and just make it their top p&amp;s camera, the GF1 is the actual replacement of the LX3 in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niko, I will have to agree with you again:)<br />
That&#8217;s why I think they will remove the RAW mode and just make it their top p&amp;s camera, the GF1 is the actual replacement of the LX3 in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>How relevent is a LX3 replacement now that the GF1 and similar EVIL cameras are available? Not to mention that true DSLRs are at the same price range now. I don&#039;t think the LX4 will be as popular as the LX3 unless it brings something new to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How relevent is a LX3 replacement now that the GF1 and similar EVIL cameras are available? Not to mention that true DSLRs are at the same price range now. I don&#8217;t think the LX4 will be as popular as the LX3 unless it brings something new to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5501</guid>
		<description>Sounds more like a replacement for the DMC-TZ7 (aka DMC-ZS3) given the lack of RAW mode. Addition of full manual control to this model would seem like a natural step as does GPS. Would 720p HD video be AVCHD Lite that is already present on the DMC-TZ7. Note it is almost exactly 12 months since launch of DMC-TZ7 and two years since launch of DMC-TZ5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds more like a replacement for the DMC-TZ7 (aka DMC-ZS3) given the lack of RAW mode. Addition of full manual control to this model would seem like a natural step as does GPS. Would 720p HD video be AVCHD Lite that is already present on the DMC-TZ7. Note it is almost exactly 12 months since launch of DMC-TZ7 and two years since launch of DMC-TZ5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/20/new-panasonic-cameras-to-be-announced-for-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-5499</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=2995#comment-5499</guid>
		<description>..and what about a new 4/3, all lenses from Panasonic 4/3 are back at Amazon .fr they were unavailable for a while and the 4/3 rumors posted a rumors about a new DSLR ,with mirror ,from Panasonic and Olympus!!!!! With a new sensor!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and what about a new 4/3, all lenses from Panasonic 4/3 are back at Amazon .fr they were unavailable for a while and the 4/3 rumors posted a rumors about a new DSLR ,with mirror ,from Panasonic and Olympus!!!!! With a new sensor!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

