<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Pentax Optio cameras fully leaked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5643</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5643</guid>
		<description>OK, it appears it &lt;i&gt;doesn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; have the electronic viewfinder, as I had hoped.  (If it did, the press releases would be mentioning it.)

Well, that just about kills my interest in this model, but I suppose the retro look will be enough for most. And seriously, I don&#039;t begrudge Pentax (OK, Hoya) any $$ they make with it.  It&#039;s just not for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it appears it <i>doesn&#8217;t</i> have the electronic viewfinder, as I had hoped.  (If it did, the press releases would be mentioning it.)</p>
<p>Well, that just about kills my interest in this model, but I suppose the retro look will be enough for most. And seriously, I don&#8217;t begrudge Pentax (OK, Hoya) any $$ they make with it.  It&#8217;s just not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5642</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5642</guid>
		<description>But the 110 Pentax is &quot;retro&quot; by now!  (So says this Spotmatic user.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the 110 Pentax is &#8220;retro&#8221; by now!  (So says this Spotmatic user.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5639</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5639</guid>
		<description>horrible cameras.look like toys. why not using an APS sensor by the way ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>horrible cameras.look like toys. why not using an APS sensor by the way ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kokoro</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5638</link>
		<dc:creator>Kokoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5638</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right marketing is the primary concern.  I apologize for my stupid and dumb comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right marketing is the primary concern.  I apologize for my stupid and dumb comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat Whilk</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5637</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat Whilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5637</guid>
		<description>&quot;it must use a sensor with similar size of the Canon G11.&quot;

Nope, 1/2.3&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it must use a sensor with similar size of the Canon G11.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope, 1/2.3&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mistral75</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5634</link>
		<dc:creator>Mistral75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5634</guid>
		<description>Sure... If this compact camera looks like the Auto 110 and is called I-10, it has nothing to do with marketing and all with stabilizing system design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure&#8230; If this compact camera looks like the Auto 110 and is called I-10, it has nothing to do with marketing and all with stabilizing system design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PY</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5630</link>
		<dc:creator>PY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5630</guid>
		<description>Well... they do just like american car makers do... Why wouldnt they ? It sells more ! (and surely costs less to design !!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; they do just like american car makers do&#8230; Why wouldnt they ? It sells more ! (and surely costs less to design !!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toocool4school</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5629</link>
		<dc:creator>toocool4school</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5629</guid>
		<description>looks like that sony camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like that sony camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legsvan</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5627</link>
		<dc:creator>Legsvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5627</guid>
		<description>Apparently with this 5.1-25mm lens it must use a sensor with similar size of the Canon G11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently with this 5.1-25mm lens it must use a sensor with similar size of the Canon G11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kokoro</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator>Kokoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5626</guid>
		<description>I/L-10 looks good in my opinion, at least the front does.  It&#039;s the slow lens that it looks like it has that is going to let it down.  SR,... maybe the reason for the body design is only to house a proper stabilizing system rather than actually doing anything too out of the ordinary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I/L-10 looks good in my opinion, at least the front does.  It&#8217;s the slow lens that it looks like it has that is going to let it down.  SR,&#8230; maybe the reason for the body design is only to house a proper stabilizing system rather than actually doing anything too out of the ordinary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5625</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5625</guid>
		<description>its not &quot;retro styling&quot; its just a direct copy of the old pentax 110 camera.  This is also something in general camera firm need to stop doing, &quot;retro&quot; styling new cameras, it just plain sucks, if they cant find a new idea they probably shouldnt bloody well make the camera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its not &#8220;retro styling&#8221; its just a direct copy of the old pentax 110 camera.  This is also something in general camera firm need to stop doing, &#8220;retro&#8221; styling new cameras, it just plain sucks, if they cant find a new idea they probably shouldnt bloody well make the camera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/25/new-pentax-optio-cameras-fully-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-5623</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3094#comment-5623</guid>
		<description>Nice retro styling on the I-10.  So does it have an electronic viewfinder, or are you stuck with the tiresome old &quot;hold it out at arm&#039;s length&quot; rain dance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice retro styling on the I-10.  So does it have an electronic viewfinder, or are you stuck with the tiresome old &#8220;hold it out at arm&#8217;s length&#8221; rain dance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

