<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus is hiding something, literally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Enche Tjin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5684</link>
		<dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5684</guid>
		<description>yes, the only reason might be price. $500 or below will be sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, the only reason might be price. $500 or below will be sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5681</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5681</guid>
		<description>Price + no worries about the dust inside + it&#039;s simpler to use (my grandma: &quot;oh! you have to change lenses in that thing!&quot; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price + no worries about the dust inside + it&#8217;s simpler to use (my grandma: &#8220;oh! you have to change lenses in that thing!&#8221; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5680</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5680</guid>
		<description>well... it is. They added support for new accessories and... that&#039;s basically everything.
EP-2 is not an alternative, it&#039;s just a poor successor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230; it is. They added support for new accessories and&#8230; that&#8217;s basically everything.<br />
EP-2 is not an alternative, it&#8217;s just a poor successor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enche Tjin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5676</link>
		<dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5676</guid>
		<description>It might be advanced compact camera then, possibly with big sensor (judging from the size). Anybody interested?

If that true, It sounds like counterintuitive to me. m43 has interchangeable lens system, why downgrade it to fixed lens camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be advanced compact camera then, possibly with big sensor (judging from the size). Anybody interested?</p>
<p>If that true, It sounds like counterintuitive to me. m43 has interchangeable lens system, why downgrade it to fixed lens camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5671</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5671</guid>
		<description>It may just be that Olympus is trying to see where the market is for these things by offering several with different features and price points and seeing which ones attract buyers...a little bit like gardening. You plant a lot and cultivate the ones that seem to prosper. Right now all the manufacturers are guessing at what features people want and what they are willing to pay for them all the while trying to get something to market while they try to sort out the technology and design. Once they get a better feel for what sells I would expect the turnover rate of models to settle down some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may just be that Olympus is trying to see where the market is for these things by offering several with different features and price points and seeing which ones attract buyers&#8230;a little bit like gardening. You plant a lot and cultivate the ones that seem to prosper. Right now all the manufacturers are guessing at what features people want and what they are willing to pay for them all the while trying to get something to market while they try to sort out the technology and design. Once they get a better feel for what sells I would expect the turnover rate of models to settle down some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5670</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5670</guid>
		<description>Mind you, the add talks about &quot;innovation&quot; so it must be a step up from the E-P1/E-P2 or it wouldn&#039;t be much innovation. (That is, if it is a m4/3 camera.) 

I think there is a market for high end m4/3 bodies. (Irrelevant of whether or not this will prove to be one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mind you, the add talks about &#8220;innovation&#8221; so it must be a step up from the E-P1/E-P2 or it wouldn&#8217;t be much innovation. (That is, if it is a m4/3 camera.) </p>
<p>I think there is a market for high end m4/3 bodies. (Irrelevant of whether or not this will prove to be one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5669</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5669</guid>
		<description>its not in The M4/3rds section of the website - stylus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its not in The M4/3rds section of the website &#8211; stylus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ItsaChris</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5668</link>
		<dc:creator>ItsaChris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5668</guid>
		<description>ok why does any one think it is a fixed non removable lens?  or are you just hoping for a new prime?  anyway the dial will be a mode dial the split color does look like some of the old mockups for the m4/3 cameras and unforgivably, it does not look to have a built in VF.  but who know the &quot;flash&quot; (right side) might just be a EVF instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok why does any one think it is a fixed non removable lens?  or are you just hoping for a new prime?  anyway the dial will be a mode dial the split color does look like some of the old mockups for the m4/3 cameras and unforgivably, it does not look to have a built in VF.  but who know the &#8220;flash&#8221; (right side) might just be a EVF instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enche Tjin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5664</link>
		<dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5664</guid>
		<description>I think E-P2 has most of the features (if not all) E-P1 has, plus it shares similar body design (except the electronic connector), so it is logical for people to think that E-P2 is an E-P1 successor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think E-P2 has most of the features (if not all) E-P1 has, plus it shares similar body design (except the electronic connector), so it is logical for people to think that E-P2 is an E-P1 successor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WT21</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5663</link>
		<dc:creator>WT21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5663</guid>
		<description>Hopefully 43 sensor in a compact with a limited range fixed lens (hopefully starting w/wide ap) and built in flash.

That&#039;d all be great. But what would be incredible, would be range-finder like controls -- ss, ap even ISO on dials, not in menus. That would be something. (though it doesn&#039;t look like it in the picture)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully 43 sensor in a compact with a limited range fixed lens (hopefully starting w/wide ap) and built in flash.</p>
<p>That&#8217;d all be great. But what would be incredible, would be range-finder like controls &#8212; ss, ap even ISO on dials, not in menus. That would be something. (though it doesn&#8217;t look like it in the picture)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5662</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5662</guid>
		<description>Yep...thats it....i just hope for a new sensor with better Drange....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230;thats it&#8230;.i just hope for a new sensor with better Drange&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5661</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5661</guid>
		<description>Sigma DPx competition....fixed lens...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma DPx competition&#8230;.fixed lens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5660</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5660</guid>
		<description>the above example was with the 14-42 lens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the above example was with the 14-42 lens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5659</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5659</guid>
		<description>Niko, you are right (as always), but this doesn&#039;t make any sense to me - the general perception of maybe 98% of potential camera buyers is that a higher numbering means a newer &amp; better version (the price difference now is over $400!):
http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26x%3D0%26ref_%3Dnb%255Fsb%255Fnoss%26y%3D0%26field-keywords%3Dolympus%2520ep%26url%3Dsearch-alias%253Daps&amp;tag=photorumors-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niko, you are right (as always), but this doesn&#8217;t make any sense to me &#8211; the general perception of maybe 98% of potential camera buyers is that a higher numbering means a newer &amp; better version (the price difference now is over $400!):<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26x%3D0%26ref_%3Dnb%255Fsb%255Fnoss%26y%3D0%26field-keywords%3Dolympus%2520ep%26url%3Dsearch-alias%253Daps&#038;tag=photorumors-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26x%3D0%26ref_%3Dnb%255Fsb%255Fnoss%26y%3D0%26field-keywords%3Dolympus%2520ep%26url%3Dsearch-alias%253Daps&#038;tag=photorumors-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spam</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5658</link>
		<dc:creator>spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5658</guid>
		<description>Fixed lens mFT don&#039;t make sense. mFT is the mount, and you don&#039;t have that on a camera with a fixed lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed lens mFT don&#8217;t make sense. mFT is the mount, and you don&#8217;t have that on a camera with a fixed lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5657</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5657</guid>
		<description>The E-P2 wasn&#039;t really meant as a replacement for the E-P1. They are both still sold side by side. So perhaps the E-P3 is just an additional model with different features, price point, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E-P2 wasn&#8217;t really meant as a replacement for the E-P1. They are both still sold side by side. So perhaps the E-P3 is just an additional model with different features, price point, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5656</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5656</guid>
		<description>Maybe the first fixed lens m43? Even more compact and cheaper than the E-P1 is now? Now, that would be cool ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the first fixed lens m43? Even more compact and cheaper than the E-P1 is now? Now, that would be cool <img src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5655</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5655</guid>
		<description>Rangefinder-look with built-in flash... (Look between index finger and thumb...) Looks dandy to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rangefinder-look with built-in flash&#8230; (Look between index finger and thumb&#8230;) Looks dandy to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enche Tjin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5654</link>
		<dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5654</guid>
		<description>from the size, it looks like another m43 wow.. It is good for consumers tho, because if you wait a bit more, other model&#039;s price will go down. just like E-P1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the size, it looks like another m43 wow.. It is good for consumers tho, because if you wait a bit more, other model&#8217;s price will go down. just like E-P1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spam</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/26/olympus-is-hiding-something-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-5653</link>
		<dc:creator>spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3127#comment-5653</guid>
		<description>Olympus has promised both cheaper and more advanced mFT models, maybe this is a cheaper one. Can&#039;t see that there are much they could remove though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympus has promised both cheaper and more advanced mFT models, maybe this is a cheaper one. Can&#8217;t see that there are much they could remove though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

