<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Olympus SP800 emerges in black and white</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5887</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5887</guid> <description>thanks - I posted that online</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks &#8211; I posted that online</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Toto</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5860</link> <dc:creator>Toto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:30:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5860</guid> <description>Hey nice. What was the french site? i need to order one ;)
thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey nice. What was the french site? i need to order one <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br
/> thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TLS</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5832</link> <dc:creator>TLS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:32:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5832</guid> <description>Looks like it&#039;ll be $349.99 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it&#8217;ll be $349.99</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nitesh</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5831</link> <dc:creator>Nitesh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:28:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5831</guid> <description>Oh goodness, why do they keep cramming megapixels on such a small sensor? It already shows problems from it, increasing the count will just make things look worse. Either put in a larger sensor, or cut back the megapixels to 10.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh goodness, why do they keep cramming megapixels on such a small sensor? It already shows problems from it, increasing the count will just make things look worse. Either put in a larger sensor, or cut back the megapixels to 10.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: We are all paparazzi</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5800</link> <dc:creator>We are all paparazzi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:31:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5800</guid> <description>It&#039;s noting but brutal, with that big lens and big flash, which works as a commander as well.I think they share the lens design with Fujifilm once again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s noting but brutal, with that big lens and big flash, which works as a commander as well.</p><p>I think they share the lens design with Fujifilm once again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: saris</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5798</link> <dc:creator>saris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:20:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5798</guid> <description>SP800  what an ugly camera!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SP800  what an ugly camera!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: just nothing</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5793</link> <dc:creator>just nothing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5793</guid> <description>Isn&#039;t it share the same lens with fuji?
Aren&#039;t they in some kind of cooperation?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it share the same lens with fuji?<br
/> Aren&#8217;t they in some kind of cooperation?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5790</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:56:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5790</guid> <description>This makes the Fuji look stunning</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes the Fuji look stunning</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/01/29/olympus-sp800-emerges-in-black-and-white/comment-page-1/#comment-5789</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3214#comment-5789</guid> <description>2010, the year of the 30X superzooms</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010, the year of the 30X superzooms</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 371/377 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 07:54:35 -->
