<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe CS5 updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: herd it</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-6088</link>
		<dc:creator>herd it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-6088</guid>
		<description>April 10th is the date I saw posted with this video on another site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April 10th is the date I saw posted with this video on another site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-6005</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-6005</guid>
		<description>What RAW files photoshop support isn&#039;t related to itself but to Adobe Camera Raw - the module responsible for opening RAW files. So unless Adobe publishes new version we gonna have support for all the RAW files we have now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What RAW files photoshop support isn&#8217;t related to itself but to Adobe Camera Raw &#8211; the module responsible for opening RAW files. So unless Adobe publishes new version we gonna have support for all the RAW files we have now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-6004</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-6004</guid>
		<description>Yep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>&quot;# It will have a module system for ad-ons just like Lightroom
# It will be easy for developers to create additional plugins.&quot;
Erm... and.... it&#039;s suppose to be new? Plugins are since one of the first versions of Photoshop, LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;# It will have a module system for ad-ons just like Lightroom<br />
# It will be easy for developers to create additional plugins.&#8221;<br />
Erm&#8230; and&#8230;. it&#8217;s suppose to be new? Plugins are since one of the first versions of Photoshop, LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spam</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>CS4 is 64 bit, except on Mac. PS has &quot;always&quot; had support for third party plugins.
If it&#039;s faster then it shold need less RAM to do the same amount of work in the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CS4 is 64 bit, except on Mac. PS has &#8220;always&#8221; had support for third party plugins.<br />
If it&#8217;s faster then it shold need less RAM to do the same amount of work in the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jehanon</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>jehanon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>64 bits for MAC ?
and when ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>64 bits for MAC ?<br />
and when ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumps</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-5997</link>
		<dc:creator>grumps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-5997</guid>
		<description>PPC = Power PC.... is this correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPC = Power PC&#8230;. is this correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/07/adobe-cs5-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-5994</link>
		<dc:creator>Global</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3354#comment-5994</guid>
		<description>How about a rumor on when it will be available?  Which cameras will its RAW support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a rumor on when it will be available?  Which cameras will its RAW support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

