<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Pentax lenses and K-m2?</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: alex</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6076</link> <dc:creator>alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6076</guid> <description>No veo ninguna diferencia en la imagen de la A700 y A900, es el mismo cuerpo.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No veo ninguna diferencia en la imagen de la A700 y A900, es el mismo cuerpo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6043</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:30:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6043</guid> <description>The DM22 is a leaf aptus back (probably old surplus stock) and half the megapixels that has been rebranded.The Phase One back equivalent in terms of megapixels (P45+) if the Pentax is 39Mps, will cost in Australian dollars around ~$20,000 to $23,000 (refurbished) or ~$35K AUD (with camera body &amp; 80mm lens). This is why I am so excited about the Pentax 645.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DM22 is a leaf aptus back (probably old surplus stock) and half the megapixels that has been rebranded.</p><p>The Phase One back equivalent in terms of megapixels (P45+) if the Pentax is 39Mps, will cost in Australian dollars around ~$20,000 to $23,000 (refurbished) or ~$35K AUD (with camera body &amp; 80mm lens). This is why I am so excited about the Pentax 645.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Din</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6041</link> <dc:creator>Din</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:17:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6041</guid> <description>The K-m2 body is like K20D body.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The K-m2 body is like K20D body.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric Pepin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6039</link> <dc:creator>Eric Pepin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:14:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6039</guid> <description>check out the mamiya website, the DM22 back is supposed to retail for right under 10 grandit should appear as a front page add.  Having pentax enter the market would definitly lower prices though and increase competition.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out the mamiya website, the DM22 back is supposed to retail for right under 10 grand</p><p>it should appear as a front page add.  Having pentax enter the market would definitly lower prices though and increase competition.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6036</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:09:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6036</guid> <description>The Mamiya back I think you are referring to is the ZD2. That back I don&#039;t think is produced anymore and for good reason. You won&#039;t get any Phase One back particularly around 40Mps for anything near that, even refurbished.That being said as an amateur I am salivating at the prospect of this camera and agree totally with you that it potentially will mark a turning point in the camera industry particularly for amateurs wanting to be released from the AA filter blurring and seeking the meduim format IQ. I just hope a few digital 645 lenses are released at teh same time as the camera.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mamiya back I think you are referring to is the ZD2. That back I don&#8217;t think is produced anymore and for good reason. You won&#8217;t get any Phase One back particularly around 40Mps for anything near that, even refurbished.</p><p>That being said as an amateur I am salivating at the prospect of this camera and agree totally with you that it potentially will mark a turning point in the camera industry particularly for amateurs wanting to be released from the AA filter blurring and seeking the meduim format IQ. I just hope a few digital 645 lenses are released at teh same time as the camera.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric Pepin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6031</link> <dc:creator>Eric Pepin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6031</guid> <description>If pentax released a digital mf for around the price of the d3x then they would have my love.  Currently mamiya is the only company that produces sub 10k digital backs, and its barely under the 10.  Pentax could destroy huge market shares of mamiya, nikon and canon with one camera release.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If pentax released a digital mf for around the price of the d3x then they would have my love.  Currently mamiya is the only company that produces sub 10k digital backs, and its barely under the 10.  Pentax could destroy huge market shares of mamiya, nikon and canon with one camera release.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fredmutter</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6026</link> <dc:creator>fredmutter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:54:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6026</guid> <description>about the 645D there is a good info here http://www.focus-numerique.com/news_id-1404.html dated from 06/08/09</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about the 645D there is a good info here <a
href="http://www.focus-numerique.com/news_id-1404.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.focus-numerique.com/news_id-1404.html</a> dated from 06/08/09</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: erich</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6025</link> <dc:creator>erich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6025</guid> <description>the name is &quot;CAPA&quot; magzine, just some photographer&#039;s predictions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the name is &#8220;CAPA&#8221; magzine, just some photographer&#8217;s predictions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff-C</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6024</link> <dc:creator>Jeff-C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:01:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6024</guid> <description>It&#039;s a Japanese magazine&#039;s speculation. We can see the percentage of possibility in the pages.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a Japanese magazine&#8217;s speculation. We can see the percentage of possibility in the pages.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WoutK89</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6021</link> <dc:creator>WoutK89</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:07:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6021</guid> <description>Is this just the same as the one with the Nikon &quot;predictions&quot;?
I don&#039;t think this one is real as well ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this just the same as the one with the Nikon &#8220;predictions&#8221;?<br
/> I don&#8217;t think this one is real as well <img
src='http://photorumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: traveller</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6020</link> <dc:creator>traveller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:11:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6020</guid> <description>Don&#039;t forget that Pentax DA lenses only have to cover an APS-C image circle, so really its a 30mm equivalent.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that Pentax DA lenses only have to cover an APS-C image circle, so really its a 30mm equivalent.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: J</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-6019</link> <dc:creator>J</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3384#comment-6019</guid> <description>A 20mm/f2 that small? Never.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 20mm/f2 that small? Never.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 423/433 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-08 20:50:25 -->
