<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tokina and Ricoh announced plans for new lenses at PMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before they happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: edward nafzger</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6476</link>
		<dc:creator>edward nafzger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6476</guid>
		<description>I have the tokina 16-50 2.8 realy good lens but let´s wait for fx tokina 16- lens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the tokina 16-50 2.8 realy good lens but let´s wait for fx tokina 16- lens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6401</link>
		<dc:creator>dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6401</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait for this. 12-24mm f/4 works really well at 18-24mm wide open on full frame already. It must be a killer lens if the price is right. There are many 24/28-70mm zooms to cover the longer F, and 16mm is wide enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for this. 12-24mm f/4 works really well at 18-24mm wide open on full frame already. It must be a killer lens if the price is right. There are many 24/28-70mm zooms to cover the longer F, and 16mm is wide enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6390</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6390</guid>
		<description>yes weird - I noticed they used the word &quot;rumor&quot; few times in their PMA feed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes weird &#8211; I noticed they used the word &#8220;rumor&#8221; few times in their PMA feed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j0elc</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6387</link>
		<dc:creator>j0elc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6387</guid>
		<description>Pretty strange angle of view.... 16-40 or 14-28 would be much better imho..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty strange angle of view&#8230;. 16-40 or 14-28 would be much better imho..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henrik2000</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6385</link>
		<dc:creator>henrik2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6385</guid>
		<description>Photorumors.com reprints news first seen on dpreview? Is that what Photorumors is all about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photorumors.com reprints news first seen on dpreview? Is that what Photorumors is all about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samlee</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6384</link>
		<dc:creator>samlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6384</guid>
		<description>16-28 from Tokina   hmmm  seems we would have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16-28 from Tokina   hmmm  seems we would have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Y</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6382</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6382</guid>
		<description>ooh a tokina 16-28 2.8 sounds fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooh a tokina 16-28 2.8 sounds fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Pepin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/02/22/tokina-and-ricoh-announced-plans-for-new-lenses-at-pma/comment-page-1/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pepin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3609#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>Ricoh is starting to get interesting, if only the interesting part wasent what made the cameras expensive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricoh is starting to get interesting, if only the interesting part wasent what made the cameras expensive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
