<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic G2 &amp; Panasonic G10 full specs are out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before they happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tequila</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6740</link>
		<dc:creator>Tequila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6740</guid>
		<description>Le G10 n&#039;a pas d&#039;écran sur rotule, le G2 l&#039;a, comme les G1, GH1
Le G10 n&#039;a pas de détecteur de viseur pour couper l&#039;écran quand on regarde dans le viseur.
Le G10 n&#039;est pas aussi performant en vidéo.
En bref, Le G10 est plus économique pour être placé à un prix agressif... Mais quand on a gouté à l&#039;écran sur rotule, on peut plus s&#039;en passer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Le G10 n&#8217;a pas d&#8217;écran sur rotule, le G2 l&#8217;a, comme les G1, GH1<br />
Le G10 n&#8217;a pas de détecteur de viseur pour couper l&#8217;écran quand on regarde dans le viseur.<br />
Le G10 n&#8217;est pas aussi performant en vidéo.<br />
En bref, Le G10 est plus économique pour être placé à un prix agressif&#8230; Mais quand on a gouté à l&#8217;écran sur rotule, on peut plus s&#8217;en passer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mm</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6560</link>
		<dc:creator>mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6560</guid>
		<description>Or just select the text on screen and copy and paste it into a word editing program, this was it will be tidier and takes only two seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just select the text on screen and copy and paste it into a word editing program, this was it will be tidier and takes only two seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillBingham2</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6546</link>
		<dc:creator>BillBingham2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6546</guid>
		<description>Do a down load of the source and look there.  Messy but it will work

B2 (;-&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a down load of the source and look there.  Messy but it will work</p>
<p>B2 (;-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Artur</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6541</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Artur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6541</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t see all the specs.... the margin is cutting some of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t see all the specs&#8230;. the margin is cutting some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuujin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6533</link>
		<dc:creator>fuujin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6533</guid>
		<description>With the 550D video features and price, it&#039;ll be a shameful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the 550D video features and price, it&#8217;ll be a shameful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuujin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>fuujin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>100% agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camp</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6531</link>
		<dc:creator>Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6531</guid>
		<description>4/3rumors is reporting the released specs are false.  That sounds likely as I cannot see Panasonic releasing a premium camera with only 720p video support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4/3rumors is reporting the released specs are false.  That sounds likely as I cannot see Panasonic releasing a premium camera with only 720p video support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henrik</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>Please check if &quot;G2&quot; isn&#039;t actually &quot;GH2&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please check if &#8220;G2&#8243; isn&#8217;t actually &#8220;GH2&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger767</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6529</link>
		<dc:creator>roger767</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6529</guid>
		<description>nah, a canon g11 is 500 dollars. So a m4/3 camera with  better IQ and the ability to change lenses is pretty cheap compared to the g11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nah, a canon g11 is 500 dollars. So a m4/3 camera with  better IQ and the ability to change lenses is pretty cheap compared to the g11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6528</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6528</guid>
		<description>But how much will they cost? Personally on a price/performance level, EVIL cams don&#039;t make sense until they are priced around 400-500USD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how much will they cost? Personally on a price/performance level, EVIL cams don&#8217;t make sense until they are priced around 400-500USD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6525</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6525</guid>
		<description>so both are 4/3 cameras? ican&#039;t really even tell the difference in specs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so both are 4/3 cameras? ican&#8217;t really even tell the difference in specs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6524</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6524</guid>
		<description>+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tibor</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>tibor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>no 24P ? dont buy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no 24P ? dont buy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enche Tjin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6522</link>
		<dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6522</guid>
		<description>It looks like Sony strategy, throwing many models and see which one stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Sony strategy, throwing many models and see which one stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger767</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6521</link>
		<dc:creator>roger767</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6521</guid>
		<description>how ridiculous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6520</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6520</guid>
		<description>Re: What are the differences between G2 and G10?

The differences seem to be in the movie modes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: What are the differences between G2 and G10?</p>
<p>The differences seem to be in the movie modes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Din</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>Din</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>What are the differences between G2 and G10?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the differences between G2 and G10?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladi</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6518</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6518</guid>
		<description>Maybe same sensor as g10 cause it got same ISO range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe same sensor as g10 cause it got same ISO range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6517</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6517</guid>
		<description>It gives us hope that maybe it has a better sensor than the previous model...that one was awful regarding DR and noise.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gives us hope that maybe it has a better sensor than the previous model&#8230;that one was awful regarding DR and noise&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR admin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6516</link>
		<dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6516</guid>
		<description>not sure why</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure why</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
