<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Panasonic G2 &amp; Panasonic G10 full specs are out</title> <atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/</link> <description>Photography news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tequila</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6740</link> <dc:creator>Tequila</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6740</guid> <description>Le G10 n&#039;a pas d&#039;écran sur rotule, le G2 l&#039;a, comme les G1, GH1
Le G10 n&#039;a pas de détecteur de viseur pour couper l&#039;écran quand on regarde dans le viseur.
Le G10 n&#039;est pas aussi performant en vidéo.
En bref, Le G10 est plus économique pour être placé à un prix agressif... Mais quand on a gouté à l&#039;écran sur rotule, on peut plus s&#039;en passer...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Le G10 n&#8217;a pas d&#8217;écran sur rotule, le G2 l&#8217;a, comme les G1, GH1<br
/> Le G10 n&#8217;a pas de détecteur de viseur pour couper l&#8217;écran quand on regarde dans le viseur.<br
/> Le G10 n&#8217;est pas aussi performant en vidéo.<br
/> En bref, Le G10 est plus économique pour être placé à un prix agressif&#8230; Mais quand on a gouté à l&#8217;écran sur rotule, on peut plus s&#8217;en passer&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mm</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6560</link> <dc:creator>mm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:26:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6560</guid> <description>Or just select the text on screen and copy and paste it into a word editing program, this was it will be tidier and takes only two seconds.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just select the text on screen and copy and paste it into a word editing program, this was it will be tidier and takes only two seconds.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BillBingham2</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6546</link> <dc:creator>BillBingham2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:40:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6546</guid> <description>Do a down load of the source and look there.  Messy but it will workB2 (;-&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a down load of the source and look there.  Messy but it will work</p><p>B2 (;-&gt;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: K. Artur</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6541</link> <dc:creator>K. Artur</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6541</guid> <description>Can&#039;t see all the specs.... the margin is cutting some of them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t see all the specs&#8230;. the margin is cutting some of them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fuujin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6533</link> <dc:creator>fuujin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6533</guid> <description>With the 550D video features and price, it&#039;ll be a shameful</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the 550D video features and price, it&#8217;ll be a shameful</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fuujin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6532</link> <dc:creator>fuujin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6532</guid> <description>100% agree</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Camp</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6531</link> <dc:creator>Camp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6531</guid> <description>4/3rumors is reporting the released specs are false.  That sounds likely as I cannot see Panasonic releasing a premium camera with only 720p video support.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4/3rumors is reporting the released specs are false.  That sounds likely as I cannot see Panasonic releasing a premium camera with only 720p video support.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: henrik</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6530</link> <dc:creator>henrik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:16:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6530</guid> <description>Please check if &quot;G2&quot; isn&#039;t actually &quot;GH2&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please check if &#8220;G2&#8243; isn&#8217;t actually &#8220;GH2&#8243;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: roger767</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6529</link> <dc:creator>roger767</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6529</guid> <description>nah, a canon g11 is 500 dollars. So a m4/3 camera with  better IQ and the ability to change lenses is pretty cheap compared to the g11.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nah, a canon g11 is 500 dollars. So a m4/3 camera with  better IQ and the ability to change lenses is pretty cheap compared to the g11.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6528</link> <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:58:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6528</guid> <description>But how much will they cost? Personally on a price/performance level, EVIL cams don&#039;t make sense until they are priced around 400-500USD</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how much will they cost? Personally on a price/performance level, EVIL cams don&#8217;t make sense until they are priced around 400-500USD</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6525</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:56:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6525</guid> <description>so both are 4/3 cameras? ican&#039;t really even tell the difference in specs</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so both are 4/3 cameras? ican&#8217;t really even tell the difference in specs</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeremy</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6524</link> <dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:40:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6524</guid> <description>+1</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tibor</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6523</link> <dc:creator>tibor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:27:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6523</guid> <description>no 24P ? dont buy....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no 24P ? dont buy&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Enche Tjin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6522</link> <dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:53:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6522</guid> <description>It looks like Sony strategy, throwing many models and see which one stick.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Sony strategy, throwing many models and see which one stick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: roger767</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6521</link> <dc:creator>roger767</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:41:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6521</guid> <description>how ridiculous</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how ridiculous</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6520</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6520</guid> <description>Re: What are the differences between G2 and G10?The differences seem to be in the movie modes</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: What are the differences between G2 and G10?</p><p>The differences seem to be in the movie modes</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Din</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6519</link> <dc:creator>Din</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:29:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6519</guid> <description>What are the differences between G2 and G10?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the differences between G2 and G10?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vladi</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6518</link> <dc:creator>Vladi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:31:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6518</guid> <description>Maybe same sensor as g10 cause it got same ISO range.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe same sensor as g10 cause it got same ISO range.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carlos</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6517</link> <dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6517</guid> <description>It gives us hope that maybe it has a better sensor than the previous model...that one was awful regarding DR and noise.........</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gives us hope that maybe it has a better sensor than the previous model&#8230;that one was awful regarding DR and noise&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PR admin</title><link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/04/panasonic-g2-panasonic-g10-full-specs-are-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6516</link> <dc:creator>PR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:07:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3696#comment-6516</guid> <description>not sure why</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure why</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 549/581 objects using memcached

Served from: photorumors.com @ 2012-02-09 08:17:15 -->
