<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Samsung NX 20-50mm f/3.5-5.6 compact zoom lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/</link>
	<description>Photography news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenwood_Geoff</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6899</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenwood_Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6899</guid>
		<description>20-50mm f/3.5-5.6   LOL ..... 3.5 to 5.6 in this short range ?  It better not cost more than a couple hundred and even at that I would not be interested</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20-50mm f/3.5-5.6   LOL &#8230;.. 3.5 to 5.6 in this short range ?  It better not cost more than a couple hundred and even at that I would not be interested</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6895</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6895</guid>
		<description>f5.6 at 50mm?  Wow, that’s some impressive feast of optical engineering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>f5.6 at 50mm?  Wow, that’s some impressive feast of optical engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlong</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6890</link>
		<dc:creator>tlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6890</guid>
		<description>I suspect this lens isn&#039;t the 20-50mm which is supposed to come out later this year but the 18-55mm non-OIS variant, a kit lens for NX5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect this lens isn&#8217;t the 20-50mm which is supposed to come out later this year but the 18-55mm non-OIS variant, a kit lens for NX5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Din</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6889</link>
		<dc:creator>Din</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6889</guid>
		<description>Samsung 20-50mm (30-75mm)
51mm x 59mm (W x H)
164gr

Olympus 14-42 (28-84mm)
62mm x 43mm (W x H)
150gr

Panasonic 14-45 (28-90mm)
60mm x 60mm (W x H)
195gr

Almost the same Panasonic focal and a little bit smaller and lighter for a APS-C zoom lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung 20-50mm (30-75mm)<br />
51mm x 59mm (W x H)<br />
164gr</p>
<p>Olympus 14-42 (28-84mm)<br />
62mm x 43mm (W x H)<br />
150gr</p>
<p>Panasonic 14-45 (28-90mm)<br />
60mm x 60mm (W x H)<br />
195gr</p>
<p>Almost the same Panasonic focal and a little bit smaller and lighter for a APS-C zoom lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6887</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6887</guid>
		<description>It has all the appearances of being a sub-kit lens, rather than a compact/lightweight alternative.  Now, if it collapsed into itself like the Olympus E-P1&#039;s kit lens, that would be worthwhile.  If it afforded a faster aperture than a standard kit lens, say 3.5-4.5, or something more ambitious, than it would have greater attraction still.  As it is, the lens offers token decreases in size and weight, and no OIS.

Yet to be seen are its distortion characteristics, which I suspect will be greatly improved over the more &quot;ambitious&quot; kit offerings.  Perhaps it will be enough to justify its existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has all the appearances of being a sub-kit lens, rather than a compact/lightweight alternative.  Now, if it collapsed into itself like the Olympus E-P1&#8242;s kit lens, that would be worthwhile.  If it afforded a faster aperture than a standard kit lens, say 3.5-4.5, or something more ambitious, than it would have greater attraction still.  As it is, the lens offers token decreases in size and weight, and no OIS.</p>
<p>Yet to be seen are its distortion characteristics, which I suspect will be greatly improved over the more &#8220;ambitious&#8221; kit offerings.  Perhaps it will be enough to justify its existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Din</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6880</link>
		<dc:creator>Din</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6880</guid>
		<description>This lens is 12mm smaller and 6mm thinner than 18-55 ois kit and almost 30gr lighter. For a APS-C camera look good for me and 30-75mm is useful no too much difference to 28mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lens is 12mm smaller and 6mm thinner than 18-55 ois kit and almost 30gr lighter. For a APS-C camera look good for me and 30-75mm is useful no too much difference to 28mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6879</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6879</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t understand zooms like this (or 35-70mm zooms back in the film days). People would be much better off just using the Samsung 30mm pancake and you know, move their feet when they need to zoom. Not only is the 30mm much smaller it also gives DOF control...something no f/3.5-5.6 standard zoom can give you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t understand zooms like this (or 35-70mm zooms back in the film days). People would be much better off just using the Samsung 30mm pancake and you know, move their feet when they need to zoom. Not only is the 30mm much smaller it also gives DOF control&#8230;something no f/3.5-5.6 standard zoom can give you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Din</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6877</link>
		<dc:creator>Din</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6877</guid>
		<description>This could be a nice lens for a small and compact a NX camera.
The actual 18-55mm kit lens is:
-63mm x 65.1mm (W x L)
-198gr (W)

That lens look small and 30-75mm (APS-C) can be nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be a nice lens for a small and compact a NX camera.<br />
The actual 18-55mm kit lens is:<br />
-63mm x 65.1mm (W x L)<br />
-198gr (W)</p>
<p>That lens look small and 30-75mm (APS-C) can be nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henrik</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6875</link>
		<dc:creator>henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6875</guid>
		<description>This one doesn&#039;t exactly tickle my fancy either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one doesn&#8217;t exactly tickle my fancy either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylwiusz</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6873</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylwiusz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6873</guid>
		<description>ROTFL, it is neither small nor light. Here is full frame Pentax lens with wider zoom range, built for FF (yes, full frame - 36x24 mm) DSLR (so it should be much bigger and heavier than lens for mirrorless camera with 2,2 x smaller sensor):
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/zooms/short/FAJ28-80f3.5-5.6.html
No comments :-/ Samsung should learn a lot, right now I can almost no gains of using their mirrorles system :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROTFL, it is neither small nor light. Here is full frame Pentax lens with wider zoom range, built for FF (yes, full frame &#8211; 36&#215;24 mm) DSLR (so it should be much bigger and heavier than lens for mirrorless camera with 2,2 x smaller sensor):<br />
<a href="http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/zooms/short/FAJ28-80f3.5-5.6.html" rel="nofollow">http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/zooms/short/FAJ28-80f3.5-5.6.html</a><br />
No comments :-/ Samsung should learn a lot, right now I can almost no gains of using their mirrorles system :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6871</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6871</guid>
		<description>If it was almost as small as a pancake then yes - but as it is it doesn&#039;t make any sense.

We want a fast f/2.8 zoom Samsung!! Or at least more fast prime pancakes. Take a hint from Pentax!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was almost as small as a pancake then yes &#8211; but as it is it doesn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
<p>We want a fast f/2.8 zoom Samsung!! Or at least more fast prime pancakes. Take a hint from Pentax!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://photorumors.com/2010/03/26/new-samsung-nx-20-50mm-f3-5-5-6-compact-zoom-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-6869</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photorumors.com/?p=3972#comment-6869</guid>
		<description>Who needs this lens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs this lens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

