Comments on: A much better Panasonic LX5 leak (directly from the mothership) http://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/ Photography news, before it happens Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:20:42 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8534 M Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:50:17 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8534 At 320x240 res it could work :) At 320×240 res it could work :)

]]> By: Peterhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8529 Peter Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:20:21 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8529 anything bellow iso 800 in the lx3 is preaty much useless, iso 12800? Yeah...right... anything bellow iso 800 in the lx3 is preaty much useless, iso 12800? Yeah…right…

]]> By: PR adminhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8525 PR admin Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:35:39 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8525 As I said already - the pages were removed, this was a leak! In two days will see the official press release. As I said already – the pages were removed, this was a leak! In two days will see the official press release.

]]> By: coolpuxhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8515 coolpux Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:09:49 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8515 6400* / 12800* (* by pixel mixed readout)could be just some gimmick . iso 3200 and below should be not much diff than LX3. 6400* / 12800* (* by pixel mixed readout)

could be just some gimmick . iso 3200 and below should be not much diff than LX3.

]]> By: Inge-M.http://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8514 Inge-M. Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:38:35 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8514 The big difference is hight ISO 3200 to ISO 12800, so maybe we necessary to wait to we look picture quality on ISO 12800. The big difference is hight ISO 3200 to ISO 12800, so maybe we necessary to wait to we look picture quality on ISO 12800.

]]> By: coolpuxhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8510 coolpux Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:47:26 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8510 lolz @ super evolved ccd sensor. should just use 1/1.63" back illuminated cmos sensor lolz @ super evolved ccd sensor. should just use 1/1.63″ back illuminated cmos sensor

]]> By: Peterhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8509 Peter Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:16:36 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8509 I agree, the zoom range is a bit wider, but that's the only real improvment, and it doesn't look as good as the lx3... I agree, the zoom range is a bit wider, but that’s the only real improvment, and it doesn’t look as good as the lx3…

]]> By: RICOH newshttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8508 RICOH news Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:49:44 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8508 Very disappointing... Very disappointing…

]]> By: Hmmmmmmmmhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8505 Hmmmmmmmm Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:29:56 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8505 The LX5 seems the copycat of similar to Ricoh GRD3 The LX5 seems the copycat of similar to Ricoh GRD3

]]> By: John Hhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8504 John H Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:48:00 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8504 The LX-5 also has:"High CRI (Color Rendering Index) LED backlight"This seems new - an LED back-lit LCD? Sounds good, but what's the good stuff that comes with this? The LX-5 also has:

“High CRI (Color Rendering Index) LED backlight”

This seems new – an LED back-lit LCD? Sounds good, but what’s the good stuff that comes with this?

]]> By: Carlos R Bhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8503 Carlos R B Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:27:04 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8503 YOu forgot to mention the step zoom(like Ricoh) as a difference between the LX3 and LX5.... YOu forgot to mention the step zoom(like Ricoh) as a difference between the LX3 and LX5….

]]> By: PR adminhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8502 PR admin Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:48:46 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8502 this is not the first time products are displayed on their website for a short period of time before announcement this is not the first time products are displayed on their website for a short period of time before announcement

]]> By: PR adminhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8501 PR admin Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:47:38 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8501 It is a leak because the official announcement is few days away. Early Monday morning those entries will be removed. It is a leak because the official announcement is few days away. Early Monday morning those entries will be removed.

]]> By: Lighting Rumourshttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8500 Lighting Rumours Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:40:18 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8500 Not really a "leak" when it's official! Not really a “leak” when it’s official!

]]> By: Legsvanhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8499 Legsvan Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:06:55 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8499 Do you think possible this new sensor improve 1 point of sensitivity comparing currrent sensor? Do you think possible this new sensor improve 1 point of sensitivity comparing currrent sensor?

]]> By: Jason Litkahttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8498 Jason Litka Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:53:50 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8498 What good is 720p60 when the sensor output is 720p30? Skip the interpolation and save the space on the card. Users could frame double after the fact if they like. What good is 720p60 when the sensor output is 720p30? Skip the interpolation and save the space on the card. Users could frame double after the fact if they like.

]]> By: greg44http://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8497 greg44 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:00:15 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8497 does it have 2.8 aperture up to higher than 60mm ? does it have 2.8 aperture up to higher than 60mm ?

]]> By: elliothttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8496 elliot Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:45:58 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8496 MJ, try reading more carefully -- these photos and specs come directly from Panasonic's website. MJ, try reading more carefully — these photos and specs come directly from Panasonic’s website.

]]> By: photonuthttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8495 photonut Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:40:44 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8495 Sign me up! Sign me up!

]]> By: MJhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/17/a-much-better-panasonic-lx5-leak-directly-from-the-mothership/comment-page-1/#comment-8494 MJ Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:24:39 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5042#comment-8494 The descriptions are poorly translated english (big time). Fake. The descriptions are poorly translated english (big time). Fake.

]]>