Comments on: A much better Panasonic LX5 leak (directly from the mothership)

By: M

Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:50:17 +0000

At 320×240 res it could work

By: Peter

Peter — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:20:21 +0000

anything bellow iso 800 in the lx3 is preaty much useless, iso 12800? Yeah…right…

By: PR admin

PR admin — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:35:39 +0000

As I said already – the pages were removed, this was a leak! In two days will see the official press release.

By: coolpux

coolpux — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:09:49 +0000

6400* / 12800* (* by pixel mixed readout)

could be just some gimmick . iso 3200 and below should be not much diff than LX3.

By: Inge-M.

Inge-M. — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:38:35 +0000

The big difference is hight ISO 3200 to ISO 12800, so maybe we necessary to wait to we look picture quality on ISO 12800.

By: coolpux

coolpux — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:47:26 +0000

lolz @ super evolved ccd sensor. should just use 1/1.63″ back illuminated cmos sensor

By: Peter

Peter — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:16:36 +0000

I agree, the zoom range is a bit wider, but that’s the only real improvment, and it doesn’t look as good as the lx3…

By: RICOH news

RICOH news — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:49:44 +0000

Very disappointing…

By: Hmmmmmmmm

Hmmmmmmmm — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:29:56 +0000

The LX5 seems the copycat of similar to Ricoh GRD3

By: John H

John H — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:48:00 +0000

The LX-5 also has:

“High CRI (Color Rendering Index) LED backlight”

This seems new – an LED back-lit LCD? Sounds good, but what’s the good stuff that comes with this?

By: Carlos R B

Carlos R B — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:27:04 +0000

YOu forgot to mention the step zoom(like Ricoh) as a difference between the LX3 and LX5….

By: PR admin

PR admin — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:48:46 +0000

this is not the first time products are displayed on their website for a short period of time before announcement

By: PR admin

PR admin — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:47:38 +0000

It is a leak because the official announcement is few days away. Early Monday morning those entries will be removed.

By: Lighting Rumours

Lighting Rumours — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:40:18 +0000

Not really a “leak” when it’s official!

By: Legsvan

Legsvan — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:06:55 +0000

Do you think possible this new sensor improve 1 point of sensitivity comparing currrent sensor?

By: Jason Litka

Jason Litka — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:53:50 +0000

What good is 720p60 when the sensor output is 720p30? Skip the interpolation and save the space on the card. Users could frame double after the fact if they like.

By: greg44

greg44 — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:00:15 +0000

does it have 2.8 aperture up to higher than 60mm ?

By: elliot

elliot — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:45:58 +0000

MJ, try reading more carefully — these photos and specs come directly from Panasonic’s website.

By: photonut

photonut — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:40:44 +0000

Sign me up!

By: MJ

MJ — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:24:39 +0000

The descriptions are poorly translated english (big time). Fake.